TFT Central, RTings and Unboxed results often line up, so it's safe to say they're using more reliable and consistent methodologies.
Check the HDR results on the AW2725DF for each of them.
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/dell/alienware-aw2725df...
TIm's review. I hope to see this thing out of stock soon considering how much of a big deal people made out the coating to be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OD1Gml24gI
A Review from Jayz, and it's a shame he barely showed the potential of BFI, which is the biggest reason to buy this monitor. We'll have to wait for more competent reviewers.
https://youtu.be/HGYyV-v9c1E?t=717
It's been out for awhile apparently, but seems like it was a very silent launch.
https://www.amazon.com/ViewSonic-XG272-2K-OLED-Ergonomic-FreeSync-Compatibility/dp/B0CSFB7YRH#customerReviews
Yea, let's compare similar performing LCD and OLED displays, the Samsung Neo G8 and the Dell AW3225QF.
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/samsung/odyssey-neo-g8-s32bg85
https://www.rtings.com/monitor/reviews/dell/alienware-aw3225qf
The LCD has noticeably worse scores in:
Worse Response...
More like: "Golf GTI, the death knell of Honda Civic SI's" :)
Dont get me wrong, LCDs can still exist. But they have to be cheaper because they perform worse.
If a 4k/240hz OLED costs $900, like the MSI model, then an equivalent LCD should cost $600.
New Blue PHOLED will solve burn-in for good apparently. Also, what is that "something"? This "something" will need to be better at what OLED already does, while not costing significantly more.
Can you try making a custom resolution for 2560x1440@360hz, please? The monitor should have enough bandwidth to handle this.
Also, how does the monitor scale 1920x1080 and 1280x720 in 4k/240hz mode? Is it sharp like the 1080p/480hz mode?