Recent content by 7im

<!-- Work Unit Control --> <next-unit-percentage v='99.9'/> Probably not the cause, as you may not have copied this verbatim from Mike, but whole numbers only, between 90-100. Would also need to see more of the log... ***System*** section, and the part where fahcore 17 starts up...

Must use the OEM drivers from NV. Open source drivers don't work. Must have client-type = advanced, already done I see.

FF merged duplicate topics. The original is here, plus the new info: https://foldingforum.org/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=25123

http://forums.evga.com/FindPost/1094557 Unfortunately, those 8P numbers from sfield are estimated. Last data on folding forum had bigadv scaling linearly to -smp 64 (i.e. almost 100%) and starts to drop off to to about 90% on a gentle curve up through smp -128 (depending on the WU, bigger...

http://fahwiki.net/index.php/Common_Error_Messages#Server_reports_problem_with_unit

As with the v6 client executable, running the V7 CLI as "fahclient --help" (2 dashes, also noted in the V7 install guide) will display all of the configuration options, even more than the commonly used list linked by Tim_H. For your convenience... Usage: fahclient [[--config] <filename>]...

V7 Linux Install Guide Sections to note in the guide, terminal install option (with support for GUI, but not required), and the command line only install option. Just saying, when you're ready... ;)

Some kind of coincidence... your posting about p7611 getting such low points, then shortly after TJ changes the points for no apparent reason, and on a Sunday. :D Good feedback results in good improvements. Are you going to give the V7 client another try?

Instead of making more silly wild @ss guesses and stirring up more unfounded animosity, why not just ask the PG researcher why that project is using the current settings? :rolleyes: Which is more likely? PG wanted to slap MP users in the face, or those other Projects got pulled back to beta...

Set the available memory in the client to less than 2800 = 69xx.

Oh, is that how the most powerful folding team deals with a losing argument? Resorting to name calling? You guys stay classy! :D Grandpa_01, please PM me if/when you get an answer from kasson. ;)

You will be asking the wrong question, and won't get an answer. Others have tried. He did not "change" what he originally posted. He added to it, reinforcing what he already said. 6903/4s were benched too high (and your charts prove it, nor have you tried to deny what your charts are...

you have pm

Kasson said what he said about 6903s/6904s. Kendrak, am I guessing blindly or not? :cool: On another note, I did not see where PG said they benched on a 4P system as ChasR said, but then I don't have access to private conversations ChasR may or may not have had with kasson. The rest is...

You actually have to visit the folding forum and folding web site once in a while to get information from PG. They don't deliver to other forums. ;) For example, here is where kasson from PG talked about 6903s/6904s thrashing the cache and getting over-benchmarked vs. the p8101 work...