Recent content by garbagemule

I'm very interested in these pictures, but it would appear that you've reached the Photobucket traffic limit or something. Could you update the links, please? :)

The TN is a TN, the U2311H is an IPS. You -should- see a difference :p

Fat knees.

But you get more pixels if you buy 2560x1600. Uh oh, that's the highest resolution of modern widescreen monitors. Looks like you STILL don't have a case.

1920x1200 > 1920x1080. I get more pixels buying the 16:10 monitor than I do if I buy the 16:9 monitor. You are making no sense. With 2560x1600 I also get more pixels than 2560x1440. What's more important, I get VALUABLE pixels. Pixels that will increase the amount of lines of code on my screen...

And again, your links turn around and bite you in the ass :) "Although it’s advantageous to having more space to work, it will help some more than others depending on what they are working on. Larger screens could also have positive health benefits for workers such as less eye squinting."...

You're the one with the doubtful claims and something to prove. I have proved everything I have said so far - you've proved nothing but the fact that you're a troll. And by that exact logic, 1920x1200 > 1920x1080. It's funny how you've completely given up on proving that 1920x1080 >...

And as I have said, that's bullshit. It doesn't matter how many 1920x1080 monitors you give me for the price of one 1920x1200, I'll still be missing pixels in the vertical direction. Also, we don't know that two 1920x1080 monitors are more efficient than one 1920x1200 monitor - not at all. There...

Haha! Well, I keep wondering why a member of 4chan suddenly finds an interest in [H]ard|Forum, because I seriously can't think of any other troll cave he could have come from >_>

It doesn't matter if I buy a $150 16:9 or a $300 16:10, I will still have fewer pixels. Even if I buy two 16:9 monitors, I will still not get any more of the vertical space that is so valuable to me and anyone else who uses their computer for work-related purposes. Go get a job in which you...

You didn't read the studies, so you wouldn't know. You've never done any work on your computer, so you wouldn't know. I'm sorry, but I can keep repeating this over and over until you get it. You have no knowledge of how valuable the extra vertical pixels are to people who use their computer for...

What he said. 1080 pixels is just not enough for anything nowadays. Not even web browsing, unless it is strictly forum posts or API documentation. 16:9 is too wide to work well with PDFs in portrait mode. 16:10 is way better for this purpose. Notice how A4 is actually squarer than 16:10, and...

I've asked you before not to bullshit me. Why do you keep doing it? We know from studies that dual-monitor setups can improve efficiency, yes. You are correct. "We" also know (I put "we" in quotation marks, because you don't have any experience with real world usage of PC monitors, whereas I and...

I don't understand how you can possibly believe this drivel yourself. Are you just saying this to stir shit up? It makes no sense. The 120 pixels mean quite a good amount of extra lines of code, documentation or website visible. If my budget is one good 16:10 monitor, I can't get two good 16:9...

@Oled Your argument is so flawed I don't even know where to start... Two 1920x1080 monitors will not give me more vertical space than a 1920x1200 monitor, and like tk-don says, if I chose two 1920x1080 monitors for the same price as a 1920x1200, I'd be getting two bad monitors instead of one...