Recent content by gjvrieze

Last but very much not least, media arguments are VERY relevant, as KK is a technical writer.

Trust me, that was option #1 that we recommended. Option #2, being XP x64, because of Server 2k3 being the closest MS has come to Linux with reliability. (still a ways to catch Linux, but man, 2k3 will run on bad hardware that will BSOD XP 32bit in a good deal of cases)

That is not completely true, as someone who has worked on hundreds, if not thousands of Vista machines with: clean loads, OEM loads, DIY loads, you name; Windows 7 is NOT nearly as slow as Vista out of the box on a 7 OEM load. I only had to play with it a few minutes to see that. It is much...

Here is the ultimate reasoning for hating 7, for me, many may agree. It is really what Vista should of been, let alone a service pack for Vista, instead all of the people that got hosed on Vista are told less then a few years later to upgrade, but pay for a new licence, when what they bought was...

XP x64 has a lot more of server 2k3 in it, then XP 32bit. So using that XP is 8 years old, is not the most valid point either. Honestly guys, I just plain hate new software and MS is not my favorite company by far, so not supporting their every try to make money does not make me dumb.

That is a valid point about the 2k8 server kernel in 7. One last thing to add to weighing of pros and cons, is the fact that he has XP x64 licences, not 7, so unless you are going to push pirating, he would have to buy a new license. I would better see that money spent on hard drives, then the...

Wet hammer here. I do not believe that we have meet, but anyone that is dumb enough to compare a home OS (Windows 7) to that of an OS which runs a server 2k3 kernel and call me dumb, can at least do it to me directly. You should prolly check out my worklogs and see what my goals are always and...

Bump for price reductions!

Bump

TTT

TTT

2 HDs left, TTT

TTT, PMs replied too.

TTT

TTT