If you are looking for a over the top flat headphone, and dead neutral, buy a used DT48e vintage pair on ebay. The 48e. They are also bulletproof, and used for testing, measurements, ENT DRs, field work, ENG, and voice reproduction, and used in hospitals, research labs, and studios. Highly...
You make me want one. I do have a modded & balanced Bel Canto DAC2.. Was 1,200 in 01.. Still is a great DAC.. & I have a upgraded Goldpoint amp pro. Best amp I heard for under a grand. Works wonders with my Ortho's & 7 DT48 headphones.
The more transparent the headphone, the more noticeable the upstreaming of your components will be.. The headphone becomes totally submissive to the components, which can be good or bad.. The 131 is that much better then the DAC in your 663? Not just different? I have the Yamaha 1800. I'm hoping...
Any electronic device that supports digital audio has a DAC.. The DAC 'interprets' how the digital music should sound.. Calculations, etc.. Digital music is easy to minipulate, thats why studio engineers love digital. More flexible then LP and analog. Theres over sampling and non over sampling...
I disagree.. 501 more natural.. The 701 lacks the AKG house mid range.. Sound stage is inflated & exaggerated with a hollow feel to it.. & can sound plastic like with certain instruments. Fitz owned ever AKG headphone, minus the 701, which tells you something.. It might be one mans opinion, but...
Not true at all about closed headphones being musically inferior. You have the DT48/900ST/W5000/D2000/D5000/ D7000/R10 'the king'/Victor 1000/Victor 700/E8/E9/Pro 900/780.. Just to name a few....)