Recent content by powerincarnate

Update: So, I ended buying this display three times; returning it twice; but now have kept it. I will try to update people on some of the key issues that i mentioned back in october. 1. Burn in: It most definitely has image retention; I do not think it is true burn in though. All the...

First. That announced LG 38 inch 144hz, Gsync got me excited and wondering if I made the right choice. I already had stated that 34 inch ultrawide is to short for me. Second: No, this time I have been a lot more careful about keeping stuff on overnight like last time. I made sure the...

There is already 27 inch 5k monitors. Several varieties actually. What doesn't exist is 5k with gysnc, >1090 hz refresh and so forth due to lack of bandwith. There are no 32 inch though. Asus had a prototype a few years ago but never released it.

Replace Michael Jordan with "LG 34wk95u" screen is very slightly less uniform, and maybe very slightly more backlight bleeding compared to the first time, but overall still excellent. I guess I'm a glutton for punishment. So pray no burn in this time.

I don't know how you guys can tolerate that. A bit over a month ago I got the lg34wk95u. I ended up returning it for burn in issues. But black screen pictures didn't come anywhere near what this was when photographed.

Apparently some people over at overclocekrs UK also have been having issues with burn-in. There even referred to this thread. One guy bought this monitor a second time, and it too developed burn in within a week. https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/threads/lg-34wk95u-5120x2160.18809206/page-10

I just came back from Microcenter; almost pulled the trigger again. The options were 1. Samsung PG27UQ. It really has the best picture quality, even above the 5K ultrawide. The FALD, 4K, 120-144hz, GSYNC, DCI P3, 1000 nit brightness, real HDR. It really has everything. It's $1599 p[lus...

I have no idea what you are referring to. I'm guessing you think this is one of those 32x9 monitors like Samsung makes. This is a true 21:9 monitor, not 16:5 as that would be 32:10 and it isn't that wide. Scaling was not an issue on Windows at all. It was literally a non-issue. I don't...

I have a pretty good eye sight, but I had to scale it 150%. At 150% it was great. I wished I had more vertical space, but everything else was great. Essentially it was a 3440 x 1440 inch monitor space, but even with the scale, the image was far sharper than the typical 3440 x1440 inch...

Like the other gentleman said, the picture is phenomenal. So good that I'm actually considering testing my luck on a new one. You can't see pixels. Color is superb and on point. It's bright, as close to real hdr without the 1000 nits required. Nits not a gaming monitor so people should t...

unfortunately we aren't sure. And regarding this monitor. Not a lot of people have owned this monitor, so there won't be answers in a while. There is only 1 review up on this monitor and it's from Linus.

it definitely did not go away in 5-30 minutes. But I also did not give it half a day or a day to test. Seeing it, on an LCD, when I had some 8 years with the Dell and never seeing anything like that, was enough to tell me to take it back. Basically, while it is an absolutely gorgeous screen...

DO NOT BUY THIS MONITOR!!!! It suffers from Burn in. Likely this is due to the Nano IPS layer that LG applied to this. This boost the colors, but seem to suffer from burn in. This Nano IPS layer is also going to be inserted in the 34 inch ultrawides and the 32inch 4K monitor that started to...

Expensive: yes, that is what happen when you are an early adopter. For example: Fine me another 4K ultrawide monitor? one where you have 5K horizontal resolution: It doesn't exist. Phillips will release one in a few months though. What about 5K 5280x2880 monitors what are the price of...

Pics