careful here, we are all getting into soapbox territory here. (by that I mean everyone including me now) but I still think that she had much better option to try and be "inclusive" that would have not alienated so much of her perspective audience. she is after all supposed to be selling a...
this. not a fan of this type of movie but when you largest demographic is white males and then you tell them they are not needed, sorry but at the least Brie Larson is shit at PR
Don't know if the would have helped him but EVERYONE should have these on every seatbelt in there car
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0030IV8TG/ref=ya_aw_od_pi?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I wonder if they are going to drop the prices much at all on those. They make good compute cards. If they do I might just jump on one. Wish the VII wasn't so damn much. Would love to run 4k textures in Skyrim.
if the 1660 TI wasn't coming out I would agree here. (mostly) The 1080 is still a pretty good card that does outperform the 2060 (If I recall its neck and neck with the 1070ti) but with the 1660ti coming out the 2060 is dead to me as an option unless Nvidia does something stupid with the pricing.
don't go for the 2060. your paying for a lot that you will not be able to use. I would really wait for the 1660 ti to come out. Makes MUCH more sense for what you looking for. If you can't wait then the 1080 used is a good option. followed by the V64 (just barely, depends on who you ask) and...
The freesync issue is far from dead. they are still going to push g-sync as much as they can as the premium product. But I get your point. If all else is equal Nvidia does have more feature sets but at the cost of support in other areas (non gaming mostly). Then again most of that is fluff...
This. I am disappointed. Why pay for 16gb of HBM? not really usable. Then again neither is ray tracing really. not this gen. Both sides have offered us cards with features that we can't use yet.