Search results

I am a developer, lots of windows open if you do the server part for web applications. Stepping up to 7770 seems to be need if this should work

Is it possible to use three 30" monitors using a HD 7750 on 2560x1600 ? What type of splitter works if I need to put two or three monitors on one displayport?

Idle power is good and that is most important, With AMD you don't need to buy as many motherboards as with intel I hope GF will improve the power consumption on higher clocks

Who needs good singlethreaded performance?

Those that actually need a fast cpu gets a fast cpu with bulldozer because most processor intensive applications are threaded.

Llano is thuban on 32nm Bulldozer on Photoshop CS5 http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/fx-8150-zambezi-bulldozer-990fx,3043-15.html Photoshop CS4 Bulldozer runs well on newer applications that need a fast cpu

It doesn't perform like shit, what it does is that it doesn't live up to expected performance. They need to focus on L1 cache speed

The lowest FPS values are higher on bulldozer

That is the main problem. I think AMD hoped for clocks about 4.0-4.2 and turbo 4.6-4.8. Maybe it will be there the next or next-next stepping.

Just read: http://www.guru3d.com/article/amd-fx-8150--8120-6100-and-4100-performance-review/

Todays programs don't need quads or more Here is one game that shows the future http://www.pcgames.de/Battlefield-3-PC-221396/News/Battlefield-3-Benchmarks-mit-AMDs-Bulldozer-im-Vergleich-zu-Phenom-2-X6-und-Intels-i7-veroeffentlicht-850268/

Gigabyte 990 FXA-UD7 http://www.kitguru.net/components/cpu/zardon/amd-fx-8150-black-edition-8-core-review-with-gigabyte-990fxa-ud7/ http://forums.extremeoverclocking.com/showthread.php?t=358508&page=3 ASRock 990FX Extreme4...

Llano!

Write speed for L1 cache sucks http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/4348/amd_fx_8150_am3_3_6ghz_bulldozer_cpu_review/index6.html

Not for me. The lowest 5% is the most important average fps on BF3 for bulldozer is ok though, maybe better than intel

http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2011/2011100701_Pre-order_prices_of_AMD_Opteron_3200_4200_and_6200_processors.html Opteron 4256 EE : 8 Cores : 2.5 GHz : TDP 35 Watt : $430.00

There seems to be some strange hiccups in that game, don't think that is a cpu issue

I was planing to get FX-8120 If all games stoped beeing developed today, no more power needed then my X3 @ 2.5 GHz would do just fine except for BF3 FX-8120 will run all games fine too. But lets say one or two years from now edit: I also think we will se some price drops soon

I am playing starcraft II with a Phenom X3 2.5 GHz. Works super. Also, that game don't need high fps

Do you know any other game that need more cpu compared to battlefield 3? If the other 98% of the games don't need a fast cpu, it doesn't matter

I am interested in games that need cpu power, games that don't tax the cpu isn't important for obvious reasons ;) Looking for a CPU that is future safe, not the one that is fast on older games

Not in battlefield 3.

have you seen the graph?

Is Bulldozer the best gamer cpu today? Checking graphs for battlefield 3 on hardocp, the lowest fps values har higher than 2500K and 2600K. I don't care if a cpu can produce 10 000 FPS in sertain parts if it also have bottlenecks. What is important is that the lowest FPS har high. Looking att...

It runs well, singlethreaded performance should be a bit slower but it seems to run better than expected. In threaded software it is going to show who is the boss

Games that don't use more cores will not be hard to run. When more games will use multithreaded rendering bulldozer will perform better, DX11 has that feature

No they can't When applications start to use more threads and more memory you need a change the cache, bigger and more flexible.Otherwise the cores will sit and wait for memory from ram and that slows performance. L3 cache on bulldozer is 8MB 64 way set associative, compare that to intels...

Much more important than you think. This means that it has better min values and that it scales better than intel. As games will be more demanding bulldozer is going to perform better and better compared to intel

http://www.techbang.com.tw/posts/7202-eight-core-amd-bulldozers-came-air-cooling-is-expected-to-5ghz

Complicated games that use a lot of memory and scale to more cores need a good cache. i5/i7 don't have as flexible cache as phenom and prefetching don't work when memory use is heavy. It doesn't matter if you overclock when cores are waiting for memory. I think that battlefield will be...

http://www.techspot.com/review/448-battlefield-3-beta-performance/page7.html http://gamegpu.ru/Action-/-FPS-/-TPS/Battlefield-3-Beta-test-GPU.html

http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?265710-AMD-Zambezi-news-info-fans-!&p=4947965&viewfull=1#post4947965

But that is exactly what happens if you increase the GPU power. You can do this in two ways. Lower the resolution or add more gpu power. The GPU is working much more linear. The load on the GPU doesn't change as much as the CPU. i5/i7 has very aggressive prefetchers on data. If the data is...

No! i5/i7 do very well when the load is light! If the game only uses one or maybe two threads on light loads and you have a GPU setup that doesn't break the CPU, i5/i7 will gain a lot of FPS.

Check Battlefield Bad Company 2 (DX11) here: http://www.tweaktown.com/reviews/3251/amd_phenom_ii_x6_1090t_black_edition_3_2ghz_six_core_cpu/index9.html

http://www.overclock3d.net/reviews/cpu_mainboard/amd_1090t_six_core_review/7 The conclusion is simple. If you, like us, have been waiting for AMD to stand proud atop the podium, they do now. If you've been hanging on to a AM2+ or 775 system and weren't sure which direction to go, your mind...

documentation from Intel and AMD, reviews does also verify the behavior

Intel's strong field are easy loads in terms of code and data that is organized, they use the cache very effectively with prefetchers in this situation. This area also simple to test ind different performance tests. But it is quite rare in normal use. At these light loads Intel has a much...

what lead? http://www.legionhardware.com/document.php?id=869&p=23