Search results

  1. S

    10 years of Intel processors, benchmarked

    The i920 I bought in 2008 and from which i'm typing this at the moment is probably the best CPU I've ever bought. It just hums along like a Caterpillar bulldozer ( pun intended ) through everything I throw at it. I still have a P4 540E ( that's Prescott based ) on socket 925XE with dual...
  2. S

    Intel OC boring?

    Back in the old school ( like 1995-2000 ) OC was done to get more performance for $, CPUs were slow, the new stuff really expensive. Nowadays, the difference between a $100 and a $999 in daily tasks is more or less impossible to tell if all you do is surf the web, office and a few movies. OC...
  3. S

    AMD ditches GloFo, goes with TSMC

    30% is like hitting the jackpot compared with GF's first attempt which produced 0 yield and the 2nd which gave 1-2 working dies per wafer.
  4. S

    Winrar is crippled with HT CPUs

    Apparently, due to the power saving features in Win7, Winrar is taking a hit since it can't awaken HT logical cores : http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?p=138245 The difference is staggering for HT enabled CPUs and completely trounce the FX cpus...
  5. S

    1100T good for AutoCAD/Revit?

    How can you suggest an OC computer for Autocad work ?!
  6. S

    HD3000 graphics 2500k

    I've been using Intel IGPs since the i810 with 4MB VRAM. They are perfectly fine for office use and light desktop scenarios.
  7. S

    AMD lays off 1400 employees, including execs

    http://semiaccurate.com/2011/11/08/looking-at-the-amd-amid-layoffs-and-new-directions/ If this is true, Trinity will be roaring success...;)
  8. S

    SB now or wait for IB?

    To SB-E or not to SB-E, that is the question !!
  9. S

    AMD lays off 1400 employees, including execs

    To have a "programming degree" and post something like this : makes me wonder where you got your degree...Zimbabwe ?
  10. S

    AMD lays off 1400 employees, including execs

    If you think parallelism exists everywhere and is easy to extract, try eating with a spoon in each hand. Thread yourself yourself first.:D
  11. S

    AMD FX-8150 Multi-GPU Gameplay Performance Review @ [H]

    ?!?! That's set in stone. That will be fixed with a new uarch, 4-5 years from now. Until then, CMT is here to stay. That's out of the question on any sensible time horizon. And it's not about hand optimization. You need experienced people for that. Probably machines do it better than...
  12. S

    AMD FX-8150 Multi-GPU Gameplay Performance Review @ [H]

    Well, naive wouldn't be a proper word, but is the closest I can think off. In a perfect world, what you'd say would work. In this real world however, anyone who operates a business knows that competition can be hard sometimes. I don't hold Intel's practices as significantly damaging...
  13. S

    AMD FX-8150 Multi-GPU Gameplay Performance Review @ [H]

    And how much did Intel gain with D0 in stock frequency ? 200MHz ? You see, OC ability doesn't translate into equivalent headroom for new bins. Thirdly, D0 did nothing for IPC. Everybody is hoping BD will somehow magically get an IPC increase with a new stepping. Fourthly, BD gaining...
  14. S

    AMD FX-8150 Multi-GPU Gameplay Performance Review @ [H]

    People have short memories and believe wonders will happen...Wait for Win8 in late 2012 or 2013 !:p Man..do yourself a favour and stop engaging in wishfull thinking. A new stepping can bring you 1-2% from tweaks, improve power consumption and yield better. But it won't fix a massive...
  15. S

    Games crash at splash screen with 8120.

    I find your entire BD experience as a journey into masochistic practices. :D
  16. S

    Games crash at splash screen with 8120.

    It is. Translation : AMD was able to reproduce the situation and is working on a fix. http://www.hardware.fr/articles/842-22/jeux-3d-total-war-shogun-2-starcraft-ii-anno-1404.html Other sites have reported the same issue and contacted AMD...
  17. S

    Games crash at splash screen with 8120.

    I feel the need to ask this : what exactly are you trying to do with all these changes ? Get the CPU to work with all games ? There is a bug in the CPU which is triggered by some games like Shogun. You can't fix that, it's up to AMD to fix either through microcode update or a new revision. I...
  18. S

    Does my 2500k really suck this bad?

    Like others have said, get the RAM at1.5V asap!! What worked with 90nm chipsets isn't working with SB. Your issues are caused by RAM.
  19. S

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    And so does my 2008 Nehalem i920. This feature was first introduced with the Nehalem familly in November 2008, exactly 3 years ago.
  20. S

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    You said : Are you sure about the "only" part ? Did you check whether this feature is also implemented in other CPUs and if so, since when ?
  21. S

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    With double the core count...:rolleyes: What exactly did Cray know of BD performance in 2009 except projections ? AMD estimated given level of performance. Cray worked with that. BD ended up below expectations and AMD had to revise its performance projections over MC. Feel free to...
  22. S

    I think it all boils down to: Bulldozer was not ready to release

    All this Cray talk is stupid. Cray will mostly likely abandon AMD after the BD debacle. They got shafted once, with Barcelona and now they are down the sink again. Cray wins contracts several years before they are implemented. The systems you see were quoted in 2008-2009. Back then, BD...
  23. S

    Is Bulldozer really this bad?

    Nice upgrade!!
  24. S

    AMD FX-8150 Efficiency vs. Other Processors (Tom's)

    LLLOOOOLLL Maybe performance even decreases while you OC it ? ;)
  25. S

    Games crash at splash screen with 8120.

    BD crashing in games is a bug in the CPU, it has nothing to do with SW. AMD is investigating the issue, was able to recreate it ( Shogun triggers it all of the time causing the CPU to deadlock ). Hopefully the problem will be solved through a microcode update ( either in the form of a new BIOS...
  26. S

    I7 920 vs FX-8150 which way to go?

    If you want to give away performance and pay extra for that privilege, by all means, go for it. I have a 920 too. The only think I'm looking at is the 2011 SB-Es. The low end model looks tempting. Going from the fastest platform money can buy, 1366, why settle for less in the future ? ;)
  27. S

    AMD Bulldozer / FX-8150 Desktop Performance Review @ [H]ardOCP

    That is impossible; repeat after me, IMPOSSIBLE. 2x4 core Westmere vs. a single 8 core FX8150. 8 full fledged Westmere cores vs. 8 half width FX cores. INT => 24 ALUs for Westmere vs. 16 for FX. FP => 16 FPU 128bit units vs. 8 128bit units ( same throughput as 16 if you use FMA )...
  28. S

    Ask AMD about Bulldozer

    How many transistors are in BD ( separated in logic, L3, system, I/O ) ? These details are usually published in ISSC or Hot Chips papers, shouldn't be classified.
  29. S

    Will Bulldozer eventually transcend Intel CPU's?

    Indeed. AMD payed like $6Billion for ATI and now the combined value of the company is $3.2B while the GPU division IIRC is hardly at break even level over its entire existence. When will the GPU division cover the ATI investment ? 2099 ?
  30. S

    JF-AMD responded on Anand forum.

    Blame the nameless engineers ?! My God, that's low. AMD engineers always claimed BD wasn't designed to improve IPC. He's Director Of Product Marketing. Rest assured that he receives a daily report on how every product under him is doing. He didn't meet the engineers in the cafeteria and...
  31. S

    SB-E could unlock to 8 cores?

    From where is this ideea that the 6 cores are 8 cores with 2 disabled ? Since Xeons are pretty large volume, I wouldn't be suprised to have 2 dies : an 8 core one and a 6 core one ( that also gives 4 with 2 cores disabled ). The volume is in the 6 core parts. It doesn't make sense (looking...
  32. S

    Picking brains - similarities between BD and the 2900xt situations...

    AMD declared they expect 3-5% from uarch tweaks ( normal for a new stepping ) and 10% from more frequency ( process maturing ). How can you "believe" in something that not even the manufacturer commits to ? The last thing AMD needs is to do things in a hurry. K10 failed because AMD did it...
  33. S

    Picking brains - similarities between BD and the 2900xt situations...

    At 45nm, a new tape out cost was $20-50 million depending on complexity. I believe BD falls firmly in the later and at 32nm it's even more than that. AMD server CPU revenues are around $85m / Q. What's another respin or two ?
  34. S

    JF-AMD responded on Anand forum.

    Complete jerk ? Paul can't stand fools, he's part of the old school and after 10-15 years on the interweb, you kinda of lose patience. His discussions on RWT with Chuck, Bill Todd, Linus Torvalds were fascinating. His wit and sharp tongue added to an incendiary mix of exquisite technical...
  35. S

    JF-AMD responded on Anand forum.

    QFT. I'd add another post from AT poster, just to reinforce this view : http://forums.anandtech.com/showpost.php?p=32424055&postcount=148 Paul Demone trashes JF's "explanation" and for good reason. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=68029856 To come now...
  36. S

    Picking brains - similarities between BD and the 2900xt situations...

    How ? They've just released the damn thing. It will take years until something new is prepared. Next gen is supposed to have 3% IPC and like 10% frequency improvement.
  37. S

    AMD Engineer Explains BD Fiasco

    I still remember the flak I got from collecting C Maier and Mitch Alsup comments and posting them here and at xs.
  38. S

    So what went wrong with BD?

    You can always buy your BD now to run Win8 on it a year from now and enjoy 3-10% more performance from the better scheduler.
  39. S

    AMD Bulldozer / FX-8150 Desktop Performance Review @ [H]ardOCP

    Yep, the IPC difference is significant.
  40. S

    So what went wrong with BD?

    The story unfolded -the uarch was simplified, less execution INT units, FPU shared, longer instruction latencies , increase cache latencies, loosing 5% IPC for 20% more frequency ( this was the plan ) -the implementation sucked because if was done with synthetised tools ( 20% larger blocks and...
Back
Top