Whos buying COD:MW2?

Originally Posted by Dan_D

That's because the developer couldn't be bothered to do a good job this time around. I liked the larger maps (Crash, Winter Crash, Crossfire, etc.) in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.

It's not up to the developers to decide for us what is fun, the developers behind Day of Defeat source game actually forceably stopped 64 player servers in their game because they didn't like the crowded gameplay on maps designed for fewer players.

Yet OBVIOUSLY people liked it because there was numerous 64 player servers which were always packed. Low and behold it was hacked or somethign was done later on to get it working again. Stupid fucking pointless restrictions, if we want to cram 64 players onto a 8 player map because we think it's fun then we'll bloody well do so, why do they get decree what is fun and what isn't? Surely the gamers decide what they find more fun.

Originally Posted by Dan_D

That's because the developer couldn't be bothered to do a good job this time around. I liked the larger maps (Crash, Winter Crash, Crossfire, etc.) in Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare.

You considered Crash a large map? Haha.

From the other thread

Originally Posted by Filtrator

For those of you that bought it,

Here is a guide to show you better ping rates,
http://www.infinityward.com/forum/vi...?f=24&t=167264

Mod it and weep.

Truer representation.

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/9067/lagbars.jpg

Originally Posted by Sent

From the other thread



Truer representation.

http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/9067/lagbars.jpg

Lol, hmmmmmmmmmmm I wonder who had host advantage? hahahaha Im really sad for those learning to love a neutered MP experience.

BC2 pwns.

Also a decent video review

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30501433...44922#33844922

Originally Posted by RamonGTP

At one time there was no running water or plumbing either, so we should be content with contaminated water that will make us a little sick and we should be fine with plumbing that backs up into your toilet every once in a while too right? By your standards that should be ok, it may not be as good as what we have now but better then when we didn't ever have it right?

Clearly a standand of living and a standard of gaming are two in the same..

Originally Posted by Dallows

Clearly a standand of living and a standard of gaming are two in the same..

It's an analogy on standards, so in theory, yes they are.

Originally Posted by sbtim

yea a lot of people have terrible uploads. i dont get how p2p works when ppl are rocking 768 kbps upload.

lol, or you could be like me, and rock 128 kpbs upload and 1.5 mbps download... I can still game online and usually own... I dunno.. I have few servers to chose from thats for sure.. I have no other option where I live to upgrade.. Canada ftw? lol

I absolutely love MW2, it's one of the better FPS games I've ever played.


That being said, I will not be purchasing this game until the PC issues are resolved. Sorry, but $60 for a game that gives me less than its' predecessor is not reasonable in the least.

Originally Posted by ojax

lol, or you could be like me, and rock 128 kpbs upload and 1.5 mbps download... I can still game online and usually own... I dunno.. I have few servers to chose from thats for sure.. I have no other option where I live to upgrade.. Canada ftw? lol

Haha rocking the same internet speeds as well, just finished single and did some multiplayer tdm matches. Single was absolute entertaining and the 3 matches i did were lag free but first time connecting gave me a lost connection.

So far im not regretting the $60 for this game like many say it is

I already gave my opinion on the game and so far convinced my friends to come try out the game in my house and all of em have said it has its problems but it seems decent. Good to see they didnt turn retarded nay sayers like most people. They are picking it up today and playing the spec ops mode after some good ol United offensive games tonight.

Originally Posted by Casper312

Haha rocking the same internet speeds as well, just finished single and did some multiplayer tdm matches. Single was absolute entertaining and the 3 matches i did were lag free but first time connecting gave me a lost connection.

So far im not regretting the $60 for this game like many say it is

I already gave my opinion on the game and so far convinced my friends to come try out the game in my house and all of em have said it has its problems but it seems decent. Good to see they didnt turn retarded nay sayers like most people. They are picking it up today and playing the spec ops mode after some good ol United offensive games tonight.

At this point BF2 has way better multiplayer than this crappy game and that game is only $10

I'm not gonna disagree with you there, I still play and enjoy BF2 (I am also on the BC2 Train, Chu Chu!).

I hate sounding like a broken record but mw2 aint that bad. Yes multi is not as good as it should be but to me all the random harsh opinions/posts that are being said are just blind sided. Like someone said on here, You take away the CoD name and this game would of been said to be a very good game on both aspects.

I have said the same thing for every CoD after the original and United Offensive... So Mw2 changes didnt hit me as hard as others took it i guess :P

That was a good find at the IW forums about ping. We have solid proof now that Nazi.net is a pile of crap.