|
Thats not even the main reasons, Erasmus, at least not in my opinion. Blade systems are designed to be small, superdense computing/storage arrays that provide as many services in the chassis as possible, to keep the compute/storage blades as small as possible. Adding a liquid type cooling system would be doable, but the size of the blades would prohibit the use of efficient liquid blocks, due to the little clearance for the block design, plus the extreme cost this would add to the blade systems. When you can get 14 physical servers in 8units of rack space, you dont have much extra room for inexpensive liquid systems in each blade. Plus the chassis itself would increase considerably in cost, due to having to add quick, drip-less disconnects inside the chassis for each blade. Ontop of that, in keeping with the blades purpose, you would have to be completely redundant and hot swappable, which means, pumps would have to be accessable, and hot swappable, with quick, drip-less disconnects, as well as the radiators.
While it would be fun to attempt, I don't think there is a current blade system that would allow such a thing to occur, all of the space is used inside the chassis, and there isnt much room to play with inside the blades. You would have to design and build a whole new blade system from the ground up with watercooling in mind. While it COULD be done, it is not a cost effective way to do things.
|
__________________
Desktop 0001 - Optimus Prime (Windows 7 RC x64) // Mobile 0001 - Jazz (Windows 7 RC)
Core i7 920============================== MSI Wind 1GB RAM, 160GB HDD
6GB Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1333
WD 640 AAKS ====================== Server 0001 - Ratchet (Windows Home Server)
XFX 4890 Xtreme ========================= Core 2 Duo, 8gb DDR2 800
Xigmatek 750 modular PSU ================== 8x 1TB SATA Hotswaps
2x 23.3" Acer displays //////////////////////////////////////// HEAT: jrdonnaruma
|
|
|