[H]ard|Forum

Go Back   [H]ard|Forum > [H]ard|Ware > Video Cards

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #1  
Old 11-29-2009, 01:07 PM
SNYP40A1 Limp Gawd, 4.9 Years
 
SNYP40A1 is offline
Intel X4500 or ATI 9200

I know they both kinda suck, but I currently have ATI 9200 (AGP) and am thinking of getting a motherboard with GMA X4500. The 9200 is definitely older, but the X4500 is integrated. X4500 also has better Linux support which is what I use. But for gaming, which one is better?
  #2  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:22 PM
joseardzm [H]Lite, 1.1 Years
 
joseardzm is offline
mm buy the mobo the x4500 isnt as bad, and you will have a good proccesor with it, i think that your 9200 is paired with a pentium4. But for gamming I think both are really lame right now, most of the games will run, but at 800x600 and not everything max out. Go for the mobo, then upgrade to a 5750 or 5600 in january/february,
__________________
System:
ANTEC EA 430W
MB:ASUS M4A785TDM-EVO
CPU: PHENOM II X2 545
GPU: SAPPHIRE RADEON HD5770
CORSAIR 2x2GB RAM DDR3 1333mhz
250GB SEAGATE HDD
SONY OPTIARC CD-RW
  #3  
Old 11-29-2009, 02:32 PM
lloose [H]ardness Supreme, 4.5 Years
 
lloose is offline
Neither are going to get you very far. If I had to choose one I would go with the intel. I doubt you would see much of a difference either way.
__________________
Core 2 Duo e6550 @ 3.03ghz
HIS ATI 4870 512mb @ 820/1110
4gb Patriot Viper DDR2 1066.
Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L
Visiontec ATI HD650
Antec Earthwatts EA650w
  #4  
Old 11-29-2009, 04:39 PM
Zero82z [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2009, 6.1 Years
 
Zero82z is offline
The 9200 doesn't even support most modern games (it's a DX8.1 card), so the GMA X4500 is the way to go.
__________________
Desktop: Q9550 @3.8GHz w/Xigmatek HDT-S1283, ASUS P5Q Pro, 4GB G.Skill PC2-8000, EVGA GTX260 216SP@702/1512/2106, EVGA 9600GSO@650/1836/1600, WD 640GB, Samsung 1TB, TT Toughpower XT 750W, CM Centurion 590, Dell S2209W 21.5", Samsung 17", Windows 7 Pro x64.
Folding/Secondary: E2140 @2.96GHz w/Thermalright SI-120, Foxconn P45 ELA, 2GB Crucial PC2-5300, EVGA 9600GSO @648/1620/1600, WD 80GB, Corsair HX520, CM Centurion 5, Dell 1701FP, Ubuntu 9.04 x64.
Laptop: HP DV2404, A64 X2 TK-53 1.7GHz, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce 6150SE, Fujitsu 160GB, 8X DVD-RW, 14.1" WXGA LCD, Windows 7 Pro x64.

[H]ard|OCP Unofficial IRC Channel: irc://irc.dp.cx:6667 #hardocp
  #5  
Old 11-29-2009, 05:08 PM
/rant/ [H]Lite, 1.3 Years
 
/rant/ is offline
GMA X4500... the 9200 won't help you with anything.
__________________
It's 7.05am. I have not slept!
  #6  
Old 11-29-2009, 08:37 PM
Smiththers2 Limp Gawd, 9 Months
 
Smiththers2 is offline
as a previous owner of a 9200 card and current owner of x4500, go with the 4500 for sure. DX10 support and HD playback works just fine. wont do many games, but will def fare way better than the 9200.
__________________
- Justin EVGA X58, core i7 920, 6gb GSKill ram, 8800GTX, 23" Samsung + 20" Acer. 640GB WD + 500GB Seagate. Asus DVDr drive. Antec Nine Hundred. Logitech G11 and V450 Mouse. Win7 Professional 64bit. Toshiba 15" w/ t5800, 3gb ram, 250gb, Centrino, Vista XFX KT-400ANB, Athlon 1800xp+ oc'd to 1916mhz. 256ram (lame) Nvidia 5200, seagate 120gb, Win 98 / Win XP dual boot. Antec ThreeHundred and some crappy old 15" LCD. i keep the whole thing for old games....
  #7  
Old 11-29-2009, 08:49 PM
jeremyshaw [H]ardness Supreme, 6 Months
 
jeremyshaw is offline
The Radeon9800 a lither lower than a FX5900Ultra, and the FX5900 Ultra gets pushed over by a 6800 (the better kind, not the lower end 6800).

The 6800 is roughly comparible to a 8400GS, which is just barely over a X4500HD.

The X4500HD is just inbetween the 8400G, and the 8400GS.

So....

in theory (memory bandwidth nonwithstanding), the X4500HD is just as fast in games.

EDIT: a 9200? It'll get pushed over by the X4500HD
  #8  
Old 11-29-2009, 09:08 PM
Zero82z [H]ard|DCer of the Month - July 2009, 6.1 Years
 
Zero82z is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyshaw View Post
The Radeon9800 a lither lower than a FX5900Ultra
Actually, the 9800 is quite a bit more powerful than the 5900.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremyshaw View Post
The 6800 is roughly comparible to a 8400GS
A 6800 is more like an overclocked 8500GT. It's much faster than an 8400GS.

All of that is moot given the actual topic, but those are some pretty big errors so I thought I'd correct them.
__________________
Desktop: Q9550 @3.8GHz w/Xigmatek HDT-S1283, ASUS P5Q Pro, 4GB G.Skill PC2-8000, EVGA GTX260 216SP@702/1512/2106, EVGA 9600GSO@650/1836/1600, WD 640GB, Samsung 1TB, TT Toughpower XT 750W, CM Centurion 590, Dell S2209W 21.5", Samsung 17", Windows 7 Pro x64.
Folding/Secondary: E2140 @2.96GHz w/Thermalright SI-120, Foxconn P45 ELA, 2GB Crucial PC2-5300, EVGA 9600GSO @648/1620/1600, WD 80GB, Corsair HX520, CM Centurion 5, Dell 1701FP, Ubuntu 9.04 x64.
Laptop: HP DV2404, A64 X2 TK-53 1.7GHz, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce 6150SE, Fujitsu 160GB, 8X DVD-RW, 14.1" WXGA LCD, Windows 7 Pro x64.

[H]ard|OCP Unofficial IRC Channel: irc://irc.dp.cx:6667 #hardocp
  #9  
Old 11-30-2009, 12:52 AM
defaultluser [H]ard|Gawd, 4.1 Years
 
defaultluser is online now
The Intel chipset buys you modern video acceleration, plus better support for modern games (neither will play them well).

I'd upgrade just for the video acceleration, especially since the next version of Flash will make use of that acceleration (currently in beta test).
__________________
This signature space FOR SALE / RENT
ACT NOW, OFFER ENDS SOON!
  #10  
Old 11-30-2009, 01:05 AM
jeremyshaw [H]ardness Supreme, 6 Months
 
jeremyshaw is offline
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zero82z View Post
Actually, the 9800 is quite a bit more powerful than the 5900.

A 6800 is more like an overclocked 8500GT. It's much faster than an 8400GS.

All of that is moot given the actual topic, but those are some pretty big errors so I thought I'd correct them.
9800pro, yes, but not the 9800 (radeon).

Thank you, though.

I always thought a 8500gt was an OC'd 8400gs (!), so I really screwed up there.
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:56 PM.


Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional

Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2000 - 2009 KB Networks, Inc.