I recently got a 20WMGX based on the comments on this forum, and I thought I'd share some comments about the monitor.
I'm not going to reiterate the reviews I've seen on this site, save to say that I generally agree with them. The NEC has very vivid colors, and a very clear presentation. It's also extremely well-built, and uses materials commensurate with its $600+ pricetag.
I've owned a bunch of other LCDs, so I'm going to make some quick comparisons which, hopefully, somebody will find useful:
MacBook LCD: This is of course a one-sided comparison, but it does highlight some useful points. The NEC has a generally similar presentation to the glossy LCD in the MacBook. Both have vivid colors and a clarity that stems from the glossy coating. The similarity is nice, because the NEC is my external monitor for the MacBook. Of course, the AS-IPS in the NEC outperforms the TN-panel in the MacBook in pretty much every metric.
HP L2335: I had an L2335 for about a week while shopping around for monitors. It's a very good, all-around LCD. Good color balance and reasonable blacks. Compared to the NEC, its clear that both are on the same part of the technology tree. The NEC is brighter, more vivid, and has deeper blacks. Whites are substantially better on the NEC, and text is much cleaner. On the other hand, the deepest black shades are better-controlled on the HP. On xtnight's grayscale tester: http://xtknight.atothosting.com/tools/blacktest.htm, I can see all the steps in the scale on both monitors, but the first ten steps seem better distributed on the L2335.
Intel Mac 20": The presentation of this LCD is very similar to the L2335, which makes sense given that they are from the same family of panels. The newer panel in the iMac is brighter than the L2335, and its text rendering is cleaner. Color quality is similar. In fares similarly to the L2335 in comparison with the NEC, though the NEC's text rendering is clearer still than the iMac's.
Dell 2405FPW: I owned the 2405 for a year and a half. It's a good monitor, but it has some substantial flaws. It's washed-out in comparison with the L2335 and the NEC. The wash-out at small angles is a very annoying effect, especially when I ran with a solid-brown background, which resulted in the edges of the monitor appearing a very different color than the center. It has an overly-strong backlight, like the NEC, but it doesn't respond as well to reduced brightness settings. Whites yellow substantially at lower brightness settings. On the other hand, the Dell has better blacks than any of the panels mentioned above.
The one thing I've noticed comparing these LCDs is that glossy LCDs are awesome. I spend all day staring at text, and the elimination of the matte coating just gets rid of a layer of haze that reduces text sharpness. Yes, they act like mirrors in poor lighting conditions, but with the indirect incandescent lighting in my office area, they look great.
In summary, the 20WMGX2 is definitely worth its price-tag. Yes, you can get get 30% more pixels for just $100-$200 more, but the quality probably won't compare.
I'm not going to reiterate the reviews I've seen on this site, save to say that I generally agree with them. The NEC has very vivid colors, and a very clear presentation. It's also extremely well-built, and uses materials commensurate with its $600+ pricetag.
I've owned a bunch of other LCDs, so I'm going to make some quick comparisons which, hopefully, somebody will find useful:
MacBook LCD: This is of course a one-sided comparison, but it does highlight some useful points. The NEC has a generally similar presentation to the glossy LCD in the MacBook. Both have vivid colors and a clarity that stems from the glossy coating. The similarity is nice, because the NEC is my external monitor for the MacBook. Of course, the AS-IPS in the NEC outperforms the TN-panel in the MacBook in pretty much every metric.
HP L2335: I had an L2335 for about a week while shopping around for monitors. It's a very good, all-around LCD. Good color balance and reasonable blacks. Compared to the NEC, its clear that both are on the same part of the technology tree. The NEC is brighter, more vivid, and has deeper blacks. Whites are substantially better on the NEC, and text is much cleaner. On the other hand, the deepest black shades are better-controlled on the HP. On xtnight's grayscale tester: http://xtknight.atothosting.com/tools/blacktest.htm, I can see all the steps in the scale on both monitors, but the first ten steps seem better distributed on the L2335.
Intel Mac 20": The presentation of this LCD is very similar to the L2335, which makes sense given that they are from the same family of panels. The newer panel in the iMac is brighter than the L2335, and its text rendering is cleaner. Color quality is similar. In fares similarly to the L2335 in comparison with the NEC, though the NEC's text rendering is clearer still than the iMac's.
Dell 2405FPW: I owned the 2405 for a year and a half. It's a good monitor, but it has some substantial flaws. It's washed-out in comparison with the L2335 and the NEC. The wash-out at small angles is a very annoying effect, especially when I ran with a solid-brown background, which resulted in the edges of the monitor appearing a very different color than the center. It has an overly-strong backlight, like the NEC, but it doesn't respond as well to reduced brightness settings. Whites yellow substantially at lower brightness settings. On the other hand, the Dell has better blacks than any of the panels mentioned above.
The one thing I've noticed comparing these LCDs is that glossy LCDs are awesome. I spend all day staring at text, and the elimination of the matte coating just gets rid of a layer of haze that reduces text sharpness. Yes, they act like mirrors in poor lighting conditions, but with the indirect incandescent lighting in my office area, they look great.
In summary, the 20WMGX2 is definitely worth its price-tag. Yes, you can get get 30% more pixels for just $100-$200 more, but the quality probably won't compare.