[Testing] Sapphire X2900XT

mascaras

Weaksauce
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
64
hi guys


I decided bought one of this cards



some pics





(Phone quality) :D








Buyng a X2900 we have 3 Valve games Free (Black BOX):

- Half-Life 2: episode2
- Portal
- Team Fortress2



and Day of Defeat till the other games dont came out
- Day of defeat




(Black BOX)












==============================================================================================================================
Start Testing







Temp Idle (53c)






temps Playing DOD (Free game with X2900)



15:35:15, ASIC Temperature via LM64 on DDC3 I2C [0] (C) = 54.750, MCLK(MHz)[0] = 513.00, SCLK(MHz)[0] = 506.25

15:44:46, ASIC Temperature via LM64 on DDC3 I2C [0] (C) = 71.125, MCLK(MHz)[0] = 828.00, SCLK(MHz)[0] = 742.50



ASIC Temperature via LM64 on DDC3 I2C [0]


Minimum temperature: 54.375 C
Maximum temperature: 71.750 C
Average temperature: 58.601 C



(max temp 71/72c)



A pic of the game DOD just to show that image quality is good



;) ;)




Just testing the CSS :p




1680x1050 - MAX Quality - AA 8x - HDR









I also noticed what others reviews already said , that in some games with this drivers when MSAA is ON we lost a lot of FPS , but like i said its just in a few games and we hope that in the next drivers this issue its solved


here is a pic in same spot , same settings only with MSAA OFF , look at the FPS (+ 200 FPS only because MSAA is OFF)
:eek: :eek:











Testing Lost planet DX9










Lost Planet DX9


Results


1600x896
X2900XT Default
E6600 @ 3600mhz
CAVE: 70
Snow :53


















Test Drive Unlimited







Sapphire X2900XT


1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA OF -- MAX Quality







1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA x2 -- MAX Quality








1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA x4 -- MAX Quality








8800GTS 320Mb @ Opteron 175 @ 2600mhz ( Just to compare Image Quality)




1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA OF -- MAX Quality







1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA x2 -- MAX Quality







1680x1050 -- HDR ON -- AA x4 -- MAX Quality






==================================================================================




3DMark 2005








X2900XT VS BFG 8800GTS OC









3Dmark2005 @ BFG 8800GTS OC @ E6600 3600mhz 17633 Marks






3dmark 2005 @ E6600 @ 3600mhz - X2900 DEFAULT 20536 Marks





:eek: :eek:




=============================================================================







NOTE: THE NEXT Results of 2x BFG 8800 GTS SLi the E6600 is runing @ 3200mhz while with X2900XT the CPU is runing @ 3600Mhz (not to compare ,Just curiosity)





DUAL BFG 8800GTS OC SLi














--3DMARK 2005 -- 2x 8800GTS SLi DEFAULT -- E6600 @ 3200Mhz (19668 Marks)








Sapphire X2900XT







--3DMARK 2005 -- X2900XT 512mb DEFAULT -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 20536 Marks)












Results with BFG 8800GTX also with E6600 @ 3200Mhz and 3800mhz( not to compare , Just curiosity )




BFG 8800GTX (Forceware 97.92)








--3DMARK 2005 ----8800GTX DEFAULT---- E6600 @ 3200Mhz ( 18007 Marks)









--3DMARK 2005 ----8800GTX DEFAULT (Forc 97.92) ---- E6600 @ 3800Mhz ( 19037 Marks)








=================================================================================0




3DMark 2006







Sapphire X2900XT VS BFG 8800GTS OC








Sapphire X2900XT




--3DMARK 2006 -- X2900XT 512mb DEFAULT (Cat 8.37) -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 11501 Marks)






BFG 8800GTS OC




--3DMARK 2006 -- BFG 8800GTS OC (Forc.158.19) -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 9926 Marks)







=====================================================================================================





Power Consumption :





results by xbit labs





I didnt had time yet to test overclock , more games , .......


when i have new tests i will post them here


sory for bad english :D






regards
 
does this guy work for ati?? lol

nah im thinking of ditching my 8800GTS 640mb to get a 2900.,,,we'll see.
 
Very nice!

Very good job compiling ALLLLL of those images.

:)

One question.
Was there a reason you ran your CPU at 3200 with the 8800GTS?
 
SINLGE 8800GTS tests also runing cpu @ 3600mhz


only runing CPU @ 3200mhz with 2x 8800gts SLI and with 8800GTX because it was the results from an "old" review i made of BFG 8800GTS SLI VS BFG 8800GTX , and a said its not to compare just curiosity


>>>> http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=134002&highlight=bfg+8800GTS


also posted here in the forum 10 minuts ago ( drivers used in that time was 97.92) >> http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1031080517&posted=1#post1031080517


does this guy work for ati?? lol

nah im thinking of ditching my 8800GTS 640mb to get a 2900.,,,we'll see.


yeah i work for ATi

>>>> http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1031080517&posted=1#post1031080517




regards
 
Nice mascaras.Thanks for sharing.Will a standard water block work on 2900xt?

Edit:Currently have 1900xt 512mb.Will same block work for 2900xt?Thank You.
 
Nice mascaras.Thanks for sharing.Will a standard water block work on 2900xt?

thnks !

i also want watercool the card , but from what i hear from Shamino of Vrzone , the Shim its taller than the Core , i think only a waterblock with the core area taller than the shim area can work Ok

a waterblock like this :



i dont have sure


regards
 
Running sli 8800gts overclocked, 1 2900xt normal clocked, only get 9900 for two sli...

Not to mention you never showed which video cards were actually in the tests. You could've overclocked or underclocked anything to get scores.

I smell BS.
 
3dmark2006default3200zvzz3.jpg


So our default 2900xt beats a 8800gtx now huh?
 
Running sli 8800gts overclocked, 1 2900xt normal clocked, only get 9900 for two sli...

Not to mention you never showed which video cards were actually in the tests. You could've overclocked or underclocked anything to get scores.

I smell BS.


?????????????????'

9900marks is SINGLE 8800GTS


smell BS??? get a life



if you want go about CPU clocks , i have here more results :




E6600 @ 3800mhz
8800GTX ( forceware 97.92)












E6600 @ 3600mhz
X2900XT (Cat 3.7)









===========================================================================================================






3DMark 2006















Sapphire X2900XT




--3DMARK 2006 -- X2900XT 512mb DEFAULT (Cat 8.37) -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 11501 Marks)






BFG 8800GTS OC




--3DMARK 2006 -- BFG 8800GTS OC (Forc.158.19) -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 9926 Marks)










3DMark 2005








X2900XT VS BFG 8800GTS OC







3Dmark2005 @ BFG 8800GTS OC (158.19) @ E6600 3600mhz 17633 Marks






3dmark 2005 @ E6600 @ 3600mhz - X2900 DEFAULT (cat 8.37) 20536 Marks







regards
 
You have a 2900xt normal clocked beating a 8800gtx OVERCLOCKED. Using the same ati drivers that got this score from more reputable sites:

lost_planet_12x78.jpg


Something is seriously wrong with your scores.

And for a person who can't seem to speak english very well, you certainly understand it perfectly. A real foreign person wouldn't fully understand english sentence structure.
 
You have a 2900xt normal clocked beating a 8800gtx OVERCLOCKED. Using the same ati drivers that got this score from more reputable sites:

where did you see a 8800GTX Overclocked ????


Something is seriously wrong with your scores.

And for a person who can't seem to speak english very well, you certainly understand it perfectly. A real foreign person wouldn't fully understand english sentence structure.

yeah my 8800GTX Scores was done with 97.92 drivers thats why 8800GTX 3dmark 2006 its lower than in other reviews where they use 158.19 (boost driver) , if you read all in 1st Post you notice that right away ;)



i thinking im wasting my time with you that seems to be a Biased , and talking with Biased ppl its wast of time

yeh my tests are fake and i work for ATi :D




regards
 
BTW, this getting completely out of hand.

The new drivers were supposed to only beat the 8800gts. Now they beat the 8800gtx.

All of these different (fake) numbers....

When theirs so many different numbers being given, it usually means one thing.

So many people gonna get their hearts crushed.
 
BTW, this getting completely out of hand.

The new drivers were supposed to only beat the 8800gts. Now they beat the 8800gtx.

.

The new drivers were supossed to beat the 8800GTS IN GAMES not in 3Dmarks , LOLLLLOL

thats no NEW that X2900 Beats 8800GTX in 3DMARKS , anyone who realy know about hardware and read the news and OTHER USERS RESULTS all over the Foruns and most important that its not BIASED know that

BW: the card even before the realeased already beat the World Record 3dmrk 2005 of the 8800 ULTRA



thats no NEW the X2900 is very good in 3dmarks




All of these different (fake) numbers....

When theirs so many different numbers being given, it usually means one thing.

So many people gonna get their hearts crushed.

yeh i know

USERS RESULTS = REAL

90% Review NUMBERS = FAKE



BTW: I HAVE the cards (X2900 & 8800GTS) im not talking for what i see in the internet like others :D










EDIT: OK i only saw your sgnature now (8800GTX) now i understand all your anger .......




regards
 
Since you like to stay in your topic, here is my topic:

First it beat 8800gts. Then people come and posts that it beat 8800gtx in 3dmark06 by about 100 points.

Then an even bigger margin comes up:

000000057009.png


000000057006.png


Rainbow Six Vegas is now almost 13 fps faster running by the 2900xt then an 8800gtx.

This makes it completely a lie.

It's time for you to see the facts.

http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=706&model2=708&chart=275

8800 is 15 fps faster then the 7950gx2 in that account.

Now, how much does 15 translate to?

http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=706&model2=708&chart=313

Over 1,700 points more in 3dmark 06. And that's not the full score either.

The full score would be 4000-5000 points more because of 15 fps.

But what about more intensive games, like the second one?

http://www23.tomshardware.com/graphics_2007.html?modelx=33&model1=706&model2=708&chart=297

Around 13 fps more, just like the original one.

And how many more does it get in 3dmark06?

1,3000 more. It would be 2000-3000 points more at the end.

If it scored 15-30 fps more in pretty much all games, it would have a score of around 4000 more in 3dmark.

Sorry to say, but even the most cool machine with a core 2 duo versus a celeron, probably wouldn't pull off getting 4000 more on itself... stock... Lets not mention core 2 versus core 2...

So, why so many numbers that are different?

The fact is, no matter how much different a card is the same exact card will not get 4000 more 3dmark scores then another.

Possibly 100, maybe 1000, but 4000?

So, tell us another lie.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Richard

Joseph Henri Richard (born February 29, 1936 in Montreal, Quebec

professional hockey champion, huh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada

Canada's two official languages are English and French.

I'll let that explain itself.
re
I could easily say I'm Hulk Hogan, am I? You'd hafta do better then that. Anyone can come into a forum and call themselves Paris Hilton or something... Unless you studied french when you were born, and only french, why would a man from canada not know english?

This is all too convinient. I'm still not buying it.

And why would a professional sports star want to let himself be known? If I was Micheal Jordan, no way in hell would I tell people who I am online, my email folder would have 1,000 emails in one day.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Richard

Joseph Henri Richard (born February 29, 1936 in Montreal, Quebec

professional hockey champion, huh?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canada

Canada's two official languages are English and French.

I'll let that explain itself.

oh my god LOLLLLLLLLLL


Henri Richard >>> AMD’s executive vice president of sales and marketing ( i was joking with you but not even a obvious thing like that you can understand , OMG :D )


btw im 28 years old , its enough for me , i already play a litle with you , no more plzzzz or if you want play BIASED ,FLAMES GAME OR CALL PPL LIERS go do it with someone of your age , IM OUT




Just to finish :


3dmark2006default3200zvzz3.jpg


So our default 2900xt beats a 8800gtx now huh?



YES!!!!!




3DMARK 2006 -- X2900XT 512mb DEFAULT (Cat 8.37) -- E6600 @ 3600Mhz ( 11501 Marks)







regards
 
LOL and I'm the president of Nvidia. How exactly do you do marketing when you can't spell worth a damn?

Honestly, anyone can come in saying these things, and if they were someone famous, why would they want people to know?

What would the real leader of sales and marketing for AMD get for talking to some person? Attempting to own some person for 30 minutes? Nothing except wasting time he should be spending working.

I tell you this much, if the AMD manager of sales and marketing was really you, and you got caught bashing a potential customer, what would happen? You'd get fired.

How many customers would someone working for AMD get if they showed rumours, and then when someone else denied them, the AMD workers bashed them?

Not only that, what does an AMD employee get out of publicly leaking rumoured code that is soon to be released? Firing.

AMD would quickly lose everything they had.

Try again.
 
Seems like the new drivers are cleaning up performance a little bit for this card.

I don't think he's a fake man, you know how many people in the world have the same name?

That wikipedia search had me roffling. Seriously...
 
Seems like the new drivers are cleaning up performance a little bit for this card.

I don't think he's a fake man, you know how many people in the world have the same name?

That wikipedia search had me roffling. Seriously...


i was joking with him because he said im ATI fan then he ask me my real name and i said my name is richard ( AMD/ATi vice president ) , but he dont even understand a obvious joke like that LOLOL

of course the scores are not fake

there is a lot of ppl when see better scores than the scores of the cards they have , they say its FAKE ( we see it all over the internet , not just here , ) Just ignore them ;)



regards
 
I also have an alienware m5750, with an x1800?

Then I have a pentium d with a x1900xt 512?

Then a 2500+ with 9600 pro.

And a 1800+ with 9600xt.

Make the call.

The x1900xt 512 did me great for awhile, but when the 8800 cards came out, I had to get one.

I'm more an ati fan then Nvidia. But this is BS from desperate fanboys.
 
I also have an alienware m5750, with an x1800?

Then I have a pentium d with a x1900xt 512?

Then a 2500+ with 9600 pro.

And a 1800+ with 9600xt.

Make the call.

I'm just going to say that we can go back and fourth back and fourth. Everyone is throwing up these "review" sites right and left, the ones you show have an X1950XTX beating an 8800GTS?! HA! :p


I'm just going to sit back and watch this all unfold. Arguing over these beta drivers when there isn't substantial proof that they actually do something is just pointless and I won't do it.

Find somebody else.

I'll check back around the time Crysis comes out to see what's what, then snag the top dog (regardless of who it is).

Thank you for sharing these results mascaras, they are most interesting and will serve as a good comparison later on.
 
LOL and I'm the president of Nvidia. How exactly do you do marketing when you can't spell worth a damn?

Honestly, anyone can come in saying these things, and if they were someone famous, why would they want people to know?

What would the real leader of sales and marketing for AMD get for talking to some person? Attempting to own some person for 30 minutes? Nothing except wasting time he should be spending working.

I tell you this much, if the AMD manager of sales and marketing was really you, and you got caught bashing a potential customer, what would happen? You'd get fired.

How many customers would someone working for AMD get if they showed rumours, and then when someone else denied them, the AMD workers bashed them?

Not only that, what does an AMD employee get out of publicly leaking rumoured code that is soon to be released? Firing.

AMD would quickly lose everything they had.

Try again.

it's a good thing you can detect sarcasm and read. :rolleyes:
 
I also have an alienware m5750, with an x1800?

Then I have a pentium d with a x1900xt 512?

Then a 2500+ with 9600 pro.

And a 1800+ with 9600xt.

Make the call.

The x1900xt 512 did me great for awhile, but when the 8800 cards came out, I had to get one.

I'm more an ati fan then Nvidia. But this is BS from desperate fanboys.

yeah , yeah ......


yep , my tests are fake i dont even have a x2900 or a 8800GTS , thats Fake photos too , i was just playing around .

regards
 
:D :D :D Heheh I win.

You got what you wanted though, a good argument, and lots of attention right? ;)

BTW, nice fakes, but I could see right thru them. But this was fun. I'm being serious.
 
LOL????

you can only be alucinating ...

if you thought 8800GTX ( card you Bought) beats the X2900 in 3dmarks i am sory if you are only knowing now that unfortnatly its not true :(


regrds
 
Who are you really? I must say that this was a very good scheme you had. With a few more things here and there, like better english, showing the video card on the 3dmark scores (or just faking it), and a few other things, you could be really good. I hope you learn from this topic. If I wasn't here it could've gone on for several days.

I just had to not let that happen ;) :p
 
Who are you really? I must say that this was a very good scheme you had. If I wasn't here it could've gone on for several days.

I just had to not let that happen ;) :p

i am mascaras , i dont wanna talk like if i am a very important guy or something like that , but if you were a user of reputable foruns like Xtreemsystems you dont even ask that ;) thats why im joking with you from the frist moment you said my tests are fake :D


regrds
 
I also have an alienware m5750, with an x1800?

Then I have a pentium d with a x1900xt 512?

Then a 2500+ with 9600 pro.

And a 1800+ with 9600xt.

Make the call.

The x1900xt 512 did me great for awhile, but when the 8800 cards came out, I had to get one.

I'm more an ati fan then Nvidia. But this is BS from desperate fanboys.

Sounds like you're out to get the top performer no matter who it is right? ;)

More of an ATi fan than nVidia?

Then why, OH WHY are you raising such a big deal over these results. You can't just go off calling them "BS from desperate fanboys" when the same could be said about you! Trying to prove these are false so your 8800 doesn't look so bad.

Come on, that's dumb. This argument can be turned on either side, the only thing is to NOT get so caught up in it.

Just something to think about.
 
I only care about performance. If ati was truly more powerful, I'd buy it and replace the 8800 in a flash.

But this topic... this was... interesting. I had to post.
 
and thats because pll like him that real and honest guys that have the work of made reviews , or post results to share with all other guys/users start stop doing it in some foruns ;)

BTW: NO ONE here said ATi is more powerfull ( IN GAMES) than 8800GTX

edit: just forget .....

regrds
 
Who are you really? I must say that this was a very good scheme you had. With a few more things here and there, like better english, showing the video card on the 3dmark scores (or just faking it), and a few other things, you could be really good. I hope you learn from this topic. If I wasn't here it could've gone on for several days.

I just had to not let that happen ;) :p

Are you serious?

Any smart person would look at multiple reviews before buying a card ;) No need to crazy over one.

The guy ran his 8800s at stock clocks (or stock factory overclocks) or so that's what it looks like.
 
and thats because pll like him that real and honest guys that have the work of made reviews , or post results to share with other guys start stop doing it in some foruns ;)

BTW: NO ONE here said ATi is more powerfull ( IN GAMES) than 8800GTX

edit: just forget .....

regrds

It's true, the 2900xt just looks good in 3dmark, it's still behind the 8800GTX in games... Like it's supposed to be.
 
Back
Top