"High Quality" Change from 7.6 - 7.8
3.14 fps gain in HL2
5.1 fps gain in Prey
And thats with AA, and AF, but what about w/o AA / AF?
1.27 LOSS in HL2 @ 1920x1200
1.2 LOSS in Prey @ 1920x1200
1.7 LOSS in min CoH @ 1920x1200
2.7 LOSS in avg CoH @ 1920x1200
Yep, everything actually lost a bit (really minimal change).
3dmark06: It went up by 93 points from 7.6 -> 7.8!
All numbers taken from http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1157/4/page_4_benchmarks_half_life_2_lost_coast_hdr/index.html
and http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1145/4/page_4_benchmarks_half_life_2_lost_coast_hdr/index.html
You have to subtract the fps of 7.6 from 7.7, store it, then subtract 7.7 from 7.8 in the other article, and add your first number to it.
Sorry guys, I hate to break it to you, but the reviewer totally skewed their conclusion page, these drivers didn't hit anything out of the park except an ability to read graphs.
And this loss / minimal change is noted by other [H] members who have posted about it on these forums.
I've asked the reviewer what might have caused the difference between 7.7 drivers in the newer review, and the 7.7 drivers in the older review. All I did was compare #s from both reviews using the drivers tested at the same time. Hopefully he can shed some light on what else might have changed.
And please, do not start flaming each other or myself keep it civil.
If others can post results from their testing that would be great.
3.14 fps gain in HL2
5.1 fps gain in Prey
And thats with AA, and AF, but what about w/o AA / AF?
1.27 LOSS in HL2 @ 1920x1200
1.2 LOSS in Prey @ 1920x1200
1.7 LOSS in min CoH @ 1920x1200
2.7 LOSS in avg CoH @ 1920x1200
Yep, everything actually lost a bit (really minimal change).
3dmark06: It went up by 93 points from 7.6 -> 7.8!
All numbers taken from http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1157/4/page_4_benchmarks_half_life_2_lost_coast_hdr/index.html
and http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/1145/4/page_4_benchmarks_half_life_2_lost_coast_hdr/index.html
You have to subtract the fps of 7.6 from 7.7, store it, then subtract 7.7 from 7.8 in the other article, and add your first number to it.
Sorry guys, I hate to break it to you, but the reviewer totally skewed their conclusion page, these drivers didn't hit anything out of the park except an ability to read graphs.
And this loss / minimal change is noted by other [H] members who have posted about it on these forums.
I've asked the reviewer what might have caused the difference between 7.7 drivers in the newer review, and the 7.7 drivers in the older review. All I did was compare #s from both reviews using the drivers tested at the same time. Hopefully he can shed some light on what else might have changed.
And please, do not start flaming each other or myself keep it civil.
If others can post results from their testing that would be great.