Your HD tune scores

kaiweiler

Limp Gawd
Joined
Dec 19, 2007
Messages
314
Hey guys, post up what kind of numbers you get on your boot drives with HD Tune!
Here's mine.
Hdspeeds.jpg

2x250gb sata2 drives in raid-0
 
some really nice speeds your getting there....

here's what i got...

my OS drive: 3x20GB 7200rpm 8mb cache drives
os%20drive.jpg



my storage drive: Samsung 160GB SATAII drive, i didnt bother to bench my 80GB external SATA drive...

storage%20drive.jpg
 
I'm just seeing black boxes?
EDIT ahh nevermind, just had to scroll about a half mile to the right...
 
Here are my drives:

Boot (4x80GB Raptor in raid0):
Untitled-1.jpg

Storage (4x320GB Barracuda in raid5):
Untitled-2.jpg

Scratch (4x1GB DDR400 on a Gigabyte i-RAM):
Untitled-3.jpg
 
Raptor 150gb 10,000 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 1.5Gb/s


WD WD7500AAKS 750gb 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s


WD WD7500AACS 750gb (Green Power) 5400 to 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s


Maxtor MaXLine Pro 500 7H500F0 500GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s


Hitachi T7K250 (HDT722525DLAT80) 250GB 7200RPM 8MB cache PATA


Seagate 7200.10 (Perp) 320GB 7200 RPM 16MB Cache SATA 3.0Gb/s


Seagate 300gb 7200rpm 16mb cache PATA


All except first drive (Raptor) are in my WHS box, the Drive Extender probably accounts for the high cpu usage.
 
Western Digital Raptor WD1600ADFS - 160GB:
WDC_WD1600ADFS-00SLR.gif


Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 - 320GB:
ST3320620AS.gif


Seagate Barracuda ES.2 - 250GB (with SATA1 jumper):
ST3250310NS_jumpered.gif


Seagate Barracuda ES.2 - 250GB (without SATA1 jumper):
ST3250310NS_nojumper.gif
 
It could be my boot drive... :p
HDtune craps out at 2199 gb, the actual array is 3.5tb (8 * 500 raid5) which is why the graph never slopes down.

hdtune.gif
 
2 x wd1600aajs in raid 0 on rocketraid 2300

HDTune_Benchmark_HPT_____DISK_0_0_AAJSRAID0_read.png



2x wd1600ys in raid 0 on rocketraid 2300, ignore the cpu use, i was running few vms at the time

HDTune_Benchmark_HPT_____DISK_0_1-wd1600ys-raid0.png
 
Last edited:
Here's mine, 2x300GB 'cuda.10s in RAID0 on ICH9R (DS3R):

HDTune_Benchmark_Intel_Raid_0_Volume.png


[LYL]Homer;1032208195 said:
Can someone with one of the new 320 and/or 640gb AAKS drives post in this thread?

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1284410
...
Here's the HD Tach for the new 320GB platter version of the WD3200AAKS. The full part number is WD3200AAKS-00B3A0.

hdtachwd3200aaksni6.png


PCMark05 Results
Code:
XP Startup:           11.114 MB/s
Application Loading:   7.991 MB/s
General Usage:         7.292 MB/s
Virus Scan:          116.577 MB/s
File Write:          101.494 MB/s

I have the drive suspended in rubber bands (Antec P150), which may affect access times slightly.

By request, here's the HDTune results:

hdtunewd3200aakssc3.png

It could be my boot drive... :p
HDtune craps out at 2199 gb, the actual array is 3.5tb (8 * 500 raid5) which is why the graph never slopes down.

What controller are you using?
 
Ok here's few more benches

4 x wd1600ys in raid10 on rocketraid 2300

HDTune_Benchmark_HPT_2300-4xwd1600ys%20in%20raid10.png


wd3200aaks (old one, 2 platters)

HDTune_Benchmark_WDC_WD3200AAKS-22VYA0.png



and last, my ramdisk :D

Read
HDTune_Benchmark_SuperSpeed_LLCRAM_Disk-read.png


Write
HDTune_Benchmark_SuperSpeed_LLCRAM_Disk-write.png
 
Last edited:
My boot array - 2xWD2500KS on ICH9R Raid 0

ich9rwv1.png


My storage array - 4x 500GB 7200.10's in RAID5 on Highpoint Rocketraid 2310 controller

highpointlu8.png


I think my next storage related upgrade will be ditching the Highpoint and going with a Perc 5/i or an Areca. Faldaani's results are amazing!
 
I think my next storage related upgrade will be ditching the Highpoint and going with a Perc 5/i or an Areca. Faldaani's results are amazing!

Well, its a 4tb 8 disk raid-5 array, and hdtune cuts out after 2tb, so.... here are the hdtach results for the same array

hdtach1.gif
 
Wow, you guys put my scores to shame.

My ESX box gets around 16MBps with 3x 74GB SCSI 10k drives in RAID5 with ServeRAID 5i.
My Openfiler box gets around 30MBps with 3x 320GB sata drives in software RAID5.


Here's what happens when you run HD Tune on a VM.
2000625063195154493_rs.jpg
 
Wow, you guys put my scores to shame.

My ESX box gets around 16MBps with 3x 74GB SCSI 10k drives in RAID5 with ServeRAID 5i.
My Openfiler box gets around 30MBps with 3x 320GB sata drives in software RAID5.

Here's what happens when you run HD Tune on a VM.

Uhm, can I say "WTF?!??!?!"? =)
 
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1000GB HD103UJ
HDTune_Benchmark_SAMSUNG_HD103UJ.png


Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB HD753LJ
HDTune_Benchmark_SAMSUNG_HD753LJ.png


Western Digital Caviar SE16 640GB WD6400AAKS-00A7B
HDTune_Benchmark_WDC_WD6400AAKS-00A7B.png
 
Anyone using the Intel matrix storage drivers can get it. You just have to enable the write-back cache, because it's disabled by default.
 
Dell XPS M1210 Lappy (200GB Hitachi 7200RPM) on MS Virtual PC 2007 running Windows XP Pro :eek: LOL. (Will post a serious test as soon as I finish my rig)

HDTachonM1210-VirtualXP-MSVirtualPC.jpg
 
Here is my server with an Areca 1280ML with (22) 750GB Seagate drives in RAID 6:

22drivesinr632MBnormalstatus80PriHD.jpg
 
Wife's Dell M1210 laptop, 200gb 7200rpm, VistaBusiness, 197gb full!



p.s. The buttons next to the Exit button provide options to capture just the HD Tune window. :)
 
Here is my server with an Areca 1280ML with (22) 750GB

Nice speeds, can you do one with HDTach, since HDtune craps out after 2tb? I want to see if theres any speed drop.

Also, is it 7200.10 or 7200.11 drives?
 
Nice speeds, can you do one with HDTach, since HDtune craps out after 2tb? I want to see if theres any speed drop.

Also, is it 7200.10 or 7200.11 drives?

Here is 22 drives in the HDTach 32MB test mode, and my drives are a mix of 7200.10s/11s and 7200.10 ES's
22drivesinr632MBnormalstatus80Pri.jpg
 
Interesting to see that the mix of the two generations doesn't hurt performance. Thats nice gjvrieze! I followed your worklog with envy. :D
 
HDTuneBootDisk.jpg


Anyone have an idea why Im getting consistently high access times? I have a 25GB partition for OS and page file is on another hard drive.

I just read Native Command Queuing increases access time but the article is dated 2004.
 
It could be my boot drive... :p
HDtune craps out at 2199 gb, the actual array is 3.5tb (8 * 500 raid5) which is why the graph never slopes down.
Sata/Sas?
edit: nvm, read that as 300, not 500gb...


Here are my results,
Adaptec 3405
3x Seagate ST3300555SS 300GB 15k rpm 16mb cache
Raid 0, 128k Stripe Size (still testing with settings)
It would be four, but the last channel on this raid card sas fanout appears to be dead :-(

hdtune
raid0hdtune255sasx3nm3.jpg

hdtach
raid0hdtachsasx3ww3.jpg
 
Here is my array, note that I benched my array from 3 disk up to 6 disk to see how the speed is affected by using more and more disks. The controller is an Areca 1280ML and the array is a raid-5 array.

3x500Gig Seagate 7200.10 and .11
ARECAx3.jpg



4x500Gig Seagate 7200.10 and .11
ARECAx4.jpg



5x500Gig Seagate 7200.10 and .11
ARECAx5.jpg



6x500Gig Seagate 7200.10, .11 and one Samsung 501LJ
ARECAx6.jpg



HD Tach on 6 disks
LARECAx6.jpg



As you can see, adding more and more drives will increase the speed of the array up to a certain point, don't know exactly where the sweet spot is but I am guessing around 12 disks.
 
Does anyone think these access times are high? Each test was done after fresh windows install on new hard drives.

Raid
HDTuneRaid.jpg

AHCI
HDTuneBootDisk.jpg

No AHCI
HDTuneNoAHCInopartitionsBoot.jpg
 
3 X 250GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 in Raid0 on Intel ICH8R with write-back cache enabled

nice tip, here's my screeny with same setting enabled, intel raid ICH8 with 2x hitachi 160's sataII

benchy.png


same as above, hdtach

tachbenchy.png


[LYLHomer said:
p.s. The buttons next to the Exit button provide options to capture just the HD Tune window.

alt + Print Screen works wonders too ;)
 
Back
Top