AMD Processor FAQ

ignitionxvi

Limp Gawd
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
324
This FAQ is being maintained by ignitionxvi.
A big thanks to ingnitionxvi and all of our FAQ contributors

Special thanks to Strictly AMD forum junkies DocFaustus, Cheeta05r and ViriiK for their contributions to the AMD Processor forum

-relic


Q&A

Q.) How do I;
Unlock/voltage mod/multiplier mod my AMD CPU?
read my AMD product code?
voltage mod my mobo?
find out if my CPU is a Palamino/Tbred/Barton?

A.) Try OC Inside's workshop for an easy to follow guide.

A.) To just decipher you CPU ID code you can also go here

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q.) How fast will my CPU go?

A.) Check out the CPU Database .
A.) For Athlon64's check out the A64 OC Data

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q.) How do I contact AMD? (Yes people actually ask me this)

A.) www.amd.com There is a Technical Support and a "Contact Us" page on the site.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q.) Why is my <higher speed rated CPU> running/reported at <lower speed than rated>

A.) Because you forgot to set your motherboard's FSB to the proper speed for your CPU. See Doc's post below for the right FSB setting for your CPU.

FSB settings:
The first number is the BIOS FSB setting the second in ()'s is the actual memory and CPU bus speed.

Spitfire Durons: 100 (200)
Morgan Durons 100 (200)
AppleBred Durons: 133 (266)

TBirds: 100 or 133 (200 or 266)
TBreds: 133 (266)
Bartons: 166 or 200 (333 or 400)
Athlon64 / AthlonFX / Opteron: 200 (400)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q.) What do the new Opteron model numbers mean?

A.) Check out AMD's Understanding Opteron Processor Numbers.

(From DocFaustus)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: I just bought a new Barton 2500+ to overclock and the multiplier is locked . What do I do now?

A: The most common overclock for that chip was to turn the FSB to 200 making it an instant 3200+. A locked Multi will not prevent that from happening. Although, good quality ram will make a big difference here.

(DocFaustus again)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: I tried overclocking my AMD CPU too far, now my computer will not post. What do I do?

A: Lots of boards have safety features built in for just this reason. Consult you motherboard's documentation to see how to get around this. Here are some common solutions:

1) When you power on the computer, try holding down the "Insert" key
2) Some motherboards will default to a slow safety speed if you power the system on and off 3 times. Try that.
3) If you have exausted all other solutions, then it is time to clear the CMOS. Here is how:

a)Unplug the power cord to the computer.
b)Push the power button to make sure all caps are discharged.
c)Pop out the battery built into the motherboard.
d)Find the CMOS jumper pins and short it out(a screwdriver can be used if the tiny jumper isn't available).
e)Move the jumper back to its original setting (that means remove the short).
f)Pop the battery back in.
g)Plug the power cord back in.
h)Turn on computer.
i)Go into the BIOS and redo all of your settings.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: What is each socket for?

A: This is basically how its been set up:

Socket 754 - mainstream
Socket 939 - enthusiust
Socket 940 - Server

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: What is special about each socket?

A: Each has there own pluses and minuses.

Socket 754:
The cheapest socket and currently AMD produces the most S754 chips, so there are no supply problems. Socket 754 chips originally came with 1mb L2 cache, but now most ship with 512kb of cache. Socket 754 chips DO NOT support dual channel memory.

Socket 939:
Socket 939 is priced much higher than socket 754, and there have been some supply problems with the S939 chips. Socket 939 comes with 512kb L2 Cache, but supports dual channel memory. Socket 939 is the best if you're looking for future proofing, because AMD will be switching to socket 939 for many of its new processors. This is also the chipset that the current and future FX runs on, and does not need registered memory.

Socket 940:
Socket 940 is for AMD's server processors, known as the Opteron. This socket also ran the FX-51 and FX-53 processors, but needed registered memory to work.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: What does the Onboard Memory Controller do?

A: It gives the Athlon64 a big performance boost. It works by allowing the CPU to directly interact with the RAM, instead of going through the northbridge like the K7 series and the P4 series. This greatly increases memory bandwidth and latency (i believe?). It also lowers the importance of onboard cache, and dual channel memory. It also allows the system to run at asyncronous bus speeds, and take a much smaller performance hit than in the K7 series.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: I need an analogy to explain the difference between AMD and Intel

A: Think of it as a pick-up vs. semi. Some rigs can hit 100MPH with 40 tons, while a pick-up could hit about 150MPH with 1 ton. The pickup is able to make more runs back and forth because it is faster than the rig, but it hauls less each time around.

Thanks Brad4321!
 
Future Processors

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Opteron 940Pin 130nm/90nm:
Big changes to the Opteron Line! (Source Inq) (Disclaimer: Don't blame me for Inq sources but I try) (Those are best guesses on which name is which comparing Inq to AMD Roadmap
Outdated
252 (1H 2005 Troy 90nm SOI)
254 (2H 2005 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
266 (2H 2006 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
268 (2H 2006 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
270 (2H 2006 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
272 (2H 2006 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
274 (2H 2006 K9 Core Italy 90nm SOI)
852 (Q4 2004 Athens 90nm SOI)
854 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
866 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
868 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
870 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
872 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
874 (2H 2006 K9 Core Egypt 90nm SOI)
Why are the opteron numbers keep going up?

Well here's my observation and you're free to correct me with evidence.
With the 148 248 and 848... It is going to support DDR400 SDRAM unlike the previous early Opteron's.. Now from my humble observation it'll keep going up to support higher memory from DDR400 to DDR433 DDR466, you get the idea.. Also another factor is those Opteron's will be less buggy and more mature in designs and also faster in mhz speed.. My 2 cents in this part..

Also, these new Opterons will most likely at some point become Dual Core, which would probably also raise the number system.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 754Pin 0.13µ 512KB Cache (New Castle):
A64 2800+ (1.8ghz)
A64 3000+ (2.0ghz)
A64 3200+ (2.2ghz)
A64 3400+ (2.4ghz)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 754Pin 0.13µ 1MB Cache (Clawhammer):
A64 3200+ (2.0ghz)
A64 3400+ (2.2ghz)
A64 3700+ (2.4ghz)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 939Pin 0.13µ 512KB Cache Dual Channel Memory (New Castle)
A64 3500+ (2.2ghz)
A64 3800+ (2.4ghz)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 939Pin 0.13µ 1MB Cache Dual Channel Memory (Sledgehammer?)
A64 FX-53 (2.4ghz)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 940Pin 0.13µ 1MB Cache (Sledgehammer)
A64 FX-51 2.2ghz
A64 FX-53 2.4Ghz
A64 FX-55 2.6Ghz (Q4 2004)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 940Pin 90nm 1MB Cache (Venus)
A64 FX-57 2.8Ghz (2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 940Pin 90nm 2MB Cache (Denmark)
A64 FX-** 3.0Ghz (2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 939Pin 90nm 512KB Cache (Winchester):
A64 4000+ 2.5Ghz (Q4 2004)
A64 4200+ 2.625Ghz (Q4 2004)
A64 4400+ 2.75Ghz (2005)
A64 4600+ 2.875Ghz (2005)
A64 4800+ 3.0Ghz (2005)
A64 5000+ 3.125Ghz (2006)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
64-Bit 939Pin 90nm 1MB Cache (San Diego)
A64 FX-57 2.8Ghz (Q3 2004)
A64 FX-59 3.0Ghz (Q3 2004)
A64 FX-61 3.2Ghz (Q4 2004)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
754Pin 0.13µ & 0.90nm, 256KB Cache (Paris & Palermo)
Duron 2800+ 2.0Ghz (Q2 2004)
Duron 3000+ 2.2Ghz (Q2 2004)
Duron 3200+ 2.4Ghz (Q4 2004)
Duron 3400+ 2.6Ghz (Q4 2004)
Duron 3600+ 2.8Ghz (Q1 2005)
Duron 3800+ 3.0Ghz (2005)
Duron 4000+ 3.2Ghz (2005)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Recent Releases:
Opteron 146 / 846
3 New Opteron (148, 248, & 848) and also DDR400 Support
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sources
Well we got an update on releases.
Image Source
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Roadmap
Roadmap
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks ViriiK!
 
Codenames

Server Line
Sledgehammer : Socket 940, 130nm, 1MB Cache, SOI, Dual Channel Registered Memory, 1**, 2**, 8**
Athens : K8, 8**, 90nm, SOI, DDR-II
Troy : K8, 2**, 90nm, SOI, DDR-II
Venus : K8, 1**, 90nm, SOI, DDR-II
Egypt : K9, 8**, 90nm, Dual Core, DDR-II
Italy : K9, 2**, 90nm, Dual Core, DDR-II
Denmark : K9, 1**, 90nm, Dual Core, DDR-II
--------------------------------------------------------------------
32-Bit A/XP Line/754
Palamino : Discontinued
Throughbred A/B : Discontinued - Remade into the Sempron for Socket A and Socket 754
Barton : Still in production until replaced by Paris, 512KB, 0.13µ, 2400+ - 3200+ Range
Applebred : Last type of chip to carry on the Socket A Duron line
Paris : 1st Generation of XP Socket 754, 130nm, 256KB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, No A64 Support
Palermo : Successor to XP Socket 754, 90nm, 256KB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, No A64 Support
Victoria : Was assume to be Paris' replacement but will be the Duron version of San Diego, 90nm, 256KB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, No A64 Support, Cheap
--------------------------------------------------------------------
A-64 754/939/940
Clawhammer : Okay there's two versions of this, the 940Pin and 754Pin at the moment
CH 940 (Opteron & FX) : Socket 940, 130nm, 1MB Cache, SOI, Dual Channel Registered Memory (First release Opteron - DDR333/First release FX - DDR400), A64 Support 6 layer boards
CH 754 : Socket 754, 130nm, 1MB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, A64 Support
New Castle : Socket 754, 130nm, 512KB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, A64 Support
Winchester : Socket 754, 90nm, 512KB Cache, SOI, Single Channel, A64 Support
San Diego : Socket 939, 90nm, 1MB Cache, SOI, Dual Channel (Registered not required), A64 Support, 4 layer boards
Toledo : Socket 939, 90nm, 2MB Cache, SOI, Dual Channel (Registered not required), A64 Support, 4 layer boards
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile CPU:
Newark : 64-Bit, Socket 754, 90nm, SOI, Low Power
Oakville/Newark/Lancaster : 64-Bit, Socket 754, 90nm, SOI, Low Power
Georgetown : Non-64-Bit, Socket 478, 90nm, SOI, Low Power
Sonora : Non-64-Bit, Socket 478, 90nm, SOI
Barton : 512KB, 0.13µ, 2400+, 2500+, 2600+ Range

I'm very vague on the Opteron/Mobile part... People are welcome to submit info's they find across the 'net on all of the categories I wrote on..

More thanks to ViriiK
 
Available Processors

Here is a quick stat list of available AMD products:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon Applebred - Duron
All of the following have 64K L2 Cache

Rating: Ghz: Bus: Multiplier:
<N/A> 1.40 266(133x2) 10.5
<N/A> 1.60 266(133x2) 12.0
<N/A> 1.80 266(133x2) 13.5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon XP Thoroughbred:
All of the following have 256K Cache

Rating: Ghz: Bus: Multiplier:
1700+ 1.47 266(133x2) 11
1800+ 1.53 266(133x2) 11.5
2000+ 1.67 266(133x2) 12.5
2100+ 1.73 266(133x2) 13
2200+ 1.80 266(133x2) 13.5
2400+ 2.00 266(133x2) 15
2600+ 2.08 333(166x2) 12.5
2700+ 2.17 333(166x2) 13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon XP Bartons
All of the following have 128K L1 and 512K L2 Cache (640K Total)

Rating: Ghz: Bus: Multiplier:
2500+ 1.83 333(166x2) 11
2600+ 1.92 333(166x2) 11.5 *new*
2800+ 2.08 333(166x2) 12.5
3000+ 2.17 333(166x2) 13
3000+ 2.10 400(200x2) 10.5
3200+ 2.20 400(200x2) 11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon XP-M Mobile Bartons
All of the following have 128K L1 and 512K L2 Cache (640K Total)

Rating: Ghz: Bus: Multiplier:
2200+ 1.67 266(133x2) 12.5
2400+ 1.80 266(133x2) 13.5
2500+ 1.87 266(133x2) 14
2600+ 2.00 266(133x2) 15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon XP 45W MOBILE
the following have 256k Cache unless otherwise specified.

Rating: GHz: Bus: Multiplier:
1700+ 1.47 266(133x2) 11
1900+ 1.60 266(133x2) 12
2000+ 1.67 266(133x2) 12.5
2200+ 1.80 266(133x2) 13.5
2400+ 2.00 266(133x2) 15
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon MP Thoroughbred/Barton
(dual capable server chip)
256k Cache unless otherwise specified

Model: Ghz: Bus: Multiplier:
1200 1.20 266(133x2) 9 (Palomino Core)
2000 1.67 266(133x2) 12.5
2200 1.80 266(133x2) 13.5
2400 2.00 266(133x2) 15
2600 2.13 266(133x2) 16
2600 2.00 266(133x2) 15(Barton Core and 512K Cache)
2800 2.13 266(133x2) 16(Barton Core and 512K Cache)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AMD Opteron (Hammer Core)
BUS: Intregrated into chip
Socket: 940 (PGA)
Cache: 1MB

Model: Ghz:
140 1.4 (for single processor motherboards)
142 1.6 (for single processor motherboards)
144 1.8 (for single processor motherboards)
146 2.0 (for single processor motherboards)
148 2.2 (for single processor motherboards)
150 2.4 (for single processor motherboards)
240 1.4 (for dual processor motherboards)
242 1.6 (for dual processor motherboards)
244 1.8 (for dual processor motherboards)
246 2.0 (for dual processor motherboards)
248 2.2 (for dual processor motherboards)
250 2.4 (for dual processor motherboards)
840 1.4 (for eight processor motherboards)
842 1.6 (for eight processor motherboards)
844 1.8 (for eight processor motherboards)
846 2.0 (for eight processor motherboards)
848 2.2(for eight processor motherboards)
From AMD's PR: All AMD Opteron processors with model numbers ending in 46 and higher will soon be available with the additional memory[PC3200] support.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon64
FSB: Intregrated into Chip, 1600Mhz Bus
Cache: 1MB L2 Cache
Socket: 754

Model: Ghz:
3200+ 2.0 (10x200)
3400+ 2.2 (11x200)
3700+ 2.4 (12x200)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Athlon 64 FX
BUS: Intregrated into Chip: 2.2 GHz
Cache: 1MB L2 Cache
Socket: 940

Model: Ghz:
FX51 2.2
FX53 2.4

Newegg was used to check availability.

Thanks DocFaustus!

PM me if I missed any or you have the stats for missing product lines.

Credit: Thanks to drako, relic, MarkLT1, ViriiK and Ravemaster Rich, Ice Czar, and DocFaustus for contributions.
 
Thanks MD Willington

If anyone else has anything they think should be added into the FAQ, PM me!
 
ignitionxvi said:
754Pin 0.13µ & 0.90nm, 256KB Cache (Paris & Palermo)
Duron 2800+ 2.0Ghz (Q2 2004)
Duron 3000+ 2.2Ghz (Q2 2004)
Duron 3200+ 2.4Ghz (Q4 2004)
Duron 3400+ 2.6Ghz (Q4 2004)
Duron 3600+ 2.8Ghz (Q1 2005)
Duron 3800+ 3.0Ghz (2005)
Duron 4000+ 3.2Ghz (2005)

Sempron or Duron? :)
 
Although there is no official support from AMD, they produced a 333FSB Athlon XP 3200+ Barton. 166x13.
 
A64 CPU Models, OPN code, PR/frequency rating

Desktop A64 939
3500+: ADA3500DEP4AW 1.5V (CG rev, FF0h) <- "NewCastle 939", 512 KB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3800+: ADA3800DEP4AW 1.5V (CG rev, FF0h) <- "NewCastle 939", 512 KB L2, 2.4 GHz, x12

Desktop A64 754
2800+: ADA2800AEP4AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) <- ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) <- ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3200+: ADA3200AEP5AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: ADA3400AEP5AP 1.5V (CO rev, F48h) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10 (512 KB L2 "disabled")
3200+: ADA3200AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: ADA3400AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3700+: ADA3700AEP5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz, x12

2800+: ADA2800AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9
3000+: ADA3000AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3200+: ADA3200AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11
3400+: ADA3400AEP4AX 1.5V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 2.4 GHz, x12

Mobile A64 754 (DTR)
3000+: AMA3000BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9
3200+: AMA3200BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz, x10
3400+: AMA3400BEX5AR 1.5V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz, x11

Mobile A64 754 1.4V
2800+: AMN2800BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.6 GHz x8
3000+: AMN3000BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 1.8 GHz x9
3200+: AMN3200BIX5AR 1.4V (CG rev, F4Ah) <- ClawHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.0 GHz x10

Mobile A64 754 1.2V
2700+: AMD2700BQX4AX 1.2V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.6 GHz, x8
2800+: AMD2800BQX4AX 1.2V (CG rev, FC0h) <- NewCastle, 512 KB L2, 1.8 GHz, x9

A64 FX 939
FX53: ADAFX53DEP5AS 1.5V (CG rev, F7Ah) <- "ClawHammer 939", 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz x12

A64 FX 940
FX51: ADAFX51CEP5AK 1.5V (CO rev, F58h) <- SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz x11
FX51: ADAFX51CEP5AT 1.5V (CG rev, F5Ah) <- SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.2 GHz x11
FX53: ADAFX53CEP5AT 1.5V (CG rev, F5Ah) <- SledgeHammer, 1 MB L2, 2.4 GHz x12


The following links detail about the models (OPN) and specifications:

A64 Model (OPN) for 754, 939, FX, including desktop, mobile DTR, low voltage:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=2760601
http://www.amdboard.com/amd64_opn.html

A64 939 spec:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=2760928

A64 754 spec:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=2760930

A64 Mobile 754 DTR, 1.4V, 1.2V spec:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=2760959

A64 FX (940, 939) spec:
http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=2761277
 
I appreciate you taking my work without telling me.. I check in every now and then for hot-deals.. I didn't expect the Faq's to be changed that much..
 
Been searching the forums, and cant seem to find if the A64 DTR processors are multiplier locked or not. I like the fact that theres no heat spreader, and if they arent locked proly a sure buy. Anyone know what the OCs are on these?
 
A chart worth all words :
AMD-CPU.gif
 
ShepsCrook said:
You missed the 3400 939 90nm and the 3500 939 90nm.
Never heard of a 3400+ on socket 939, it is not even on AMD's website.

For the 3500+ 939 @ 90 nm it is on the chart, the model number 3500+ is a merge of 2 cells, only die dize column is splitted.
 
Overclocking Tips

Thanks Enraged78

Here's how I generally get the CPU's maximum to determine my overclock:

1. Drop the HT to 2x or 3x.
2. Drop the memory speed from 400 to 200.
3. Up the voltage until the temperature hits where you are comfortable for your idle temps. Remember that temps will increase as your clock cycles do. Voltage alone does not dictate temperature. 1.6V is usually OK on air-cooling. 1.65V and above is pushing it.
4.) Boot Windows, and run Prime 95 Torture test in Maximum heat mode.
5.) Run your favorite video card torture test as well. Why? Because voltage drops affect your O/C, and your video card sucks up a lot of juice.
6.) Fire up the NForce System utility, and slowly up the FSB until Prime 95 craps out.
7.) Restart Prime 95, knock the FSB down two clicks, and write the CPU's frequency and temps down. That's your new target O/C number.
8.) Drop back into the BIOS, raise memory speed back up to 400, up the memory voltage to where you are comfortable with and set your target CAS latency.
9.) Boot Windows, Fire up Prime 95 with the memory torture test.
10.) Fire up the NForce System utility, and raise the FSB until Prime 95 craps out. It most likely will NOT hit the numbers it did before, but you did just find out how far your memory will O/C.

Now comes the tricky part. You have to essentially 'balance' the three variables (CPU speed, memory speed, and HT speed) to achieve your maximum overclock. Usually, this means dropping the HT speed a peg, memory speed down to 333, and cranking everything up so that each component is performing it's best relative to the other two. Your mileage will probably vary. You will have to play with the system a lot to find the 'sweet spot', but try not to get too comfortable with it. When all is said and done, I like to torture test my systems for at least 24 hours under full load. If it can do this, I consider it stable. A system should be able to go for a week at 100% load without crapping out.

FYI, I've had a 754 hit 2.63Ghz on Air-Cooling using this method. I had an old Opteron 146 engineering sample up to 2.42Ghz using this method as well. I've built quite a few of these over the last few months, and have yet to see one that wouldn't do at LEAST 2.3Ghz completely stable. This includes some very early samples and engineering samples. It's most likely NOT your motherboard, or your chipset, as I have personally had a SK8N NForce 3 150 (very early sample), up to 265 on the frontside, with a reduced HT bus.
 
if anyone else has a "how-to" on overclocking athlon64's, feel free to PM me and i can add it to my post, or just post it hear yourself.
 
05.01.21
1. Since the prescots were melting mobo and intel decided rather than fix them to just scrap the project but keep the lga775 insert for future cpu...
2. Since the dual-core intel +3.6GHz cpu is pushed back to mid 2006...
3. Seems it is time to rebuild my Piii 700MHz system with amd in mind. From the mobo up.
4. Mayby the Nforce5 mobo will retail this year. But the A64 will still only have their DDR1 integrated memory controller. The lack of usage of DDR2 and soon DDR3 has been my main concern with AMD besides it's lower fsb.
5. Nothing much worse than finally buying the components to build the system one will game with for the next two or three years and two months down the line the cpu either drops 1/2 in price or the new and much beter performing cpu retails (at way too high margin) that requires not only a new mobo but system memory and OS.
6. atm, seems the A64 + DDR1 + nforce4 is the system for gaming.. leaving many having to decide whether to upgrade from a R9800pro to the X800 (using a GF2 gts 32MB atm.)
7. Even AMD is kinda keeping quiet about their dual-core workstation (gaming) cpu and to what extent one will have to have a 754 or 940 or 939 pin insert mobo for it.
8. This post is to gather opinions about if or when the A64 will support DDR2 and when the dual-core A64 (with what type of sdram they will 'control.')
9. Since many if not most AMD users still use the nforce3 mobo is it recomended to wait for the nforce5 (?sata II,) to retail and get their problems worked out. (Hopefully no more VIA problematic chipsets.)
 
bug said:
05.01.21
1. Since the prescots were melting mobo and intel decided rather than fix them to just scrap the project but keep the lga775 insert for future cpu...
2. Since the dual-core intel +3.6GHz cpu is pushed back to mid 2006...
3. Seems it is time to rebuild my Piii 700MHz system with amd in mind. From the mobo up.
4. Mayby the Nforce5 mobo will retail this year. But the A64 will still only have their DDR1 integrated memory controller. The lack of usage of DDR2 and soon DDR3 has been my main concern with AMD besides it's lower fsb.
5. Nothing much worse than finally buying the components to build the system one will game with for the next two or three years and two months down the line the cpu either drops 1/2 in price or the new and much beter performing cpu retails (at way too high margin) that requires not only a new mobo but system memory and OS.
6. atm, seems the A64 + DDR1 + nforce4 is the system for gaming.. leaving many having to decide whether to upgrade from a R9800pro to the X800 (using a GF2 gts 32MB atm.)
7. Even AMD is kinda keeping quiet about their dual-core workstation (gaming) cpu and to what extent one will have to have a 754 or 940 or 939 pin insert mobo for it.
8. This post is to gather opinions about if or when the A64 will support DDR2 and when the dual-core A64 (with what type of sdram they will 'control.')
9. Since many if not most AMD users still use the nforce3 mobo is it recomended to wait for the nforce5 (?sata II,) to retail and get their problems worked out. (Hopefully no more VIA problematic chipsets.)


HAHAHA i like that....
 
Pabuchok said:
Been searching the forums, and cant seem to find if the A64 DTR processors are multiplier locked or not. I like the fact that theres no heat spreader, and if they arent locked proly a sure buy. Anyone know what the OCs are on these?

there locked, and the lack of the Heatspreader make HS contact weak, withought modification, witch dosnt seem like a problem to me :) The DTR is the same a desktop chips votlage and wattage...the mobiels i belive run a bit lower voltagae...probely do better overclocking wise, but almost nothing can run the,..

but there is miniamal board support for them and they dont overclock any better than the good desktop chips....unlike the gap between the AXP and AXP-M...
 
Lower Multis are Unlocked on ALL A64 chips. This is for the "Cool N' Quiet" technology that can run your processor slower if the demand isnt there.

Dont bother with the DTR chips... Get the Mobile. The run at lower Stock voltage and overclock great....

Impaqt
3400+ Mobile CG Clawhammer owner.
 
ignitionxvi said:
Overclocking Tips

Thanks Enraged78

Here's how I generally get the CPU's maximum to determine my overclock:

1. Drop the HT to 2x or 3x.
2. Drop the memory speed from 400 to 200.
3. Up the voltage until the temperature hits where you are comfortable for your idle temps. Remember that temps will increase as your clock cycles do. Voltage alone does not dictate temperature. 1.6V is usually OK on air-cooling. 1.65V and above is pushing it.
4.) Boot Windows, and run Prime 95 Torture test in Maximum heat mode.
5.) Run your favorite video card torture test as well. Why? Because voltage drops affect your O/C, and your video card sucks up a lot of juice.
6.) Fire up the NForce System utility, and slowly up the FSB until Prime 95 craps out.
7.) Restart Prime 95, knock the FSB down two clicks, and write the CPU's frequency and temps down. That's your new target O/C number.
8.) Drop back into the BIOS, raise memory speed back up to 400, up the memory voltage to where you are comfortable with and set your target CAS latency.
9.) Boot Windows, Fire up Prime 95 with the memory torture test.
10.) Fire up the NForce System utility, and raise the FSB until Prime 95 craps out. It most likely will NOT hit the numbers it did before, but you did just find out how far your memory will O/C.

Now comes the tricky part. You have to essentially 'balance' the three variables (CPU speed, memory speed, and HT speed) to achieve your maximum overclock. Usually, this means dropping the HT speed a peg, memory speed down to 333, and cranking everything up so that each component is performing it's best relative to the other two. Your mileage will probably vary. You will have to play with the system a lot to find the 'sweet spot', but try not to get too comfortable with it. When all is said and done, I like to torture test my systems for at least 24 hours under full load. If it can do this, I consider it stable. A system should be able to go for a week at 100% load without crapping out.

FYI, I've had a 754 hit 2.63Ghz on Air-Cooling using this method. I had an old Opteron 146 engineering sample up to 2.42Ghz using this method as well. I've built quite a few of these over the last few months, and have yet to see one that wouldn't do at LEAST 2.3Ghz completely stable. This includes some very early samples and engineering samples. It's most likely NOT your motherboard, or your chipset, as I have personally had a SK8N NForce 3 150 (very early sample), up to 265 on the frontside, with a reduced HT bus.

does this also apply to the FX 55
 
timeless said:
does this also apply to the FX 55

Sure why not? only thing is you can bypass a high HTT and memory speed and overclcok with mulltiplyer that only effect the CPU...personally even if i had a FX-55 i would still want more memory bandwith so i would still OC the HTT
 
ok i have a problem
i have an AMD 4000+ and a dfi nf4 ultra lanparty-D and OCZ PC3200 EL PE REV1
now i have read ur overclock guide so many times and followed the steps that u have mentioned
lower multiplier, boost FSB, do ratio FSB/memory, relax timings, increase voltages (of course after many tries) and the outcome is nothing. it wont even boot, and sometimes wont even get me to go to the bios, which then i have to open up the box and do a jumper setting to reset the bios.
now the only reason i'm pissed is that i always read the review and u have a setup that is so similair to mine and able to clock it. am i missing anything.
i don,t wanna go extreme, i'm new to this overclocking thing and i just want to experience it.
 
hmmm, never tried it
but i think it will work
this thing is really pissing me off
anyways how far can i get the 4000+ with stock fan
can i get it to 2.6 or over
 
Changed HTT Multiplier? Only thing I can think of.

Your 4000+ should go above 2.6ghz I'd think. My 3500+ does 2.7ghz stable in everything but Prime95

 
mr_ouija said:
Changed HTT Multiplier? Only thing I can think of.

Your 4000+ should go above 2.6ghz I'd think. My 3500+ does 2.7ghz stable in everything but Prime95

your 3500 at 2.7? are you on air ouja? what are you settings at if i may ask?
 
Hello,
Any idea which AMD Athlon 64 motherboard works well with Linux, Debian distr? I had some compatibility / drivers issues before.
 
Back
Top