Is it 6800nu or me when it comes to running TimBury?

P

provoko

Gawd
Joined
Aug 6, 2004
Messages
656
For some reason timbury runs extremely slow, is is that way on purpose?

http://www.nzone.com/object/nzone_timbury_downloads.html

System specs
athlon xp 2400+
6800nu
1gb pc3200

EDIT:
It's very strange, I get 1500/8500/3200 in 3dmark01/03/05.
I can run doom 3, farcry, america's army all around 60 FPS with 4/8 aa/af.

But timbury runs between 0 and 1 FPS without any aa/af.

Somethings wrong with timbury, could it be the 66 drivers?
 
Might be that your 2400+ is bottlenecking the 6800NU. Just a thought.

SaViOr
 
It's very strange, I get 1500/8500/3200 in 3dmark01/03/05.
I can run doom 3, farcry, america's army all around 60 FPS with 4/8 aa/af.

But timbury runs between 0 and 1 FPS without any aa/af.

Somethings wrong with timbury, could it be the 66 drivers? Nalu runs perfectly, I don't get it.

Timbury light is the same thing, 0-1 FPS.
 
I figured it out, it was AGP aperture size, it was set to 128, so I raised it to 256 and now I'm getting a boat load of frames.
 
provoko said:
I figured it out, it was AGP aperture size, it was set to 128, so I raised it to 256 and now I'm getting a boat load of frames.
Click to expand...

I was going to ask/point that out, glad you found it on your own. Mine was doing the same thing and it fixed it right up :)
 
This has been the only moment that agp apperture size mattered. I've never had to move that thing up from 128mb. All my benchmarks are the same at 256mb agp apperture size.

I don't understand how this single graphical program out of allll the programs (even 3dmark2005 + doom 3) i've ever ran needed more agp apperture size, what the hell did it do with it?

It's strange, that's all i'm saying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top