(cf)Eclipse
Freelance Overclocker
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2003
- Messages
- 30,027
All right, I just got this in today, and ran some tests comparing my 3200+ clawhammer to my 3700+ newark with both at 2.0ghz, same settings for ram.
I tested the msi k8n neo platinum first. it booted with bios 1.6 with no problem. was at 2.4ghz, and 1.36v in the bios, which makes me think it defaulted to 1.4v instead of the 1.35v it should have been. One quirk to be aware of: I didn't see any option for Command Rate in the bios, and it defaults to 2T. once in windows, i switched to 1T without a problem and managed to run windows memtest for a while until i decided 1T wasn't about to kill anything
next up, then main rig's mobo, the dfi lanparty ut-nf3. it booted at 200x4 and .9v at first. i manually set it to 200x12 and 1.35v. curiously, i got a raid detect screen before getting into memtest. slightly confused, i went back to the bios and loaded optimized defaults, saved, then went back in and set everything i needed to set. it works!
here i have some screens of the core in operation
(i especially like the "venice" label given by CBID!)
onto the benches. same settings, same board, same ram. everything. only difference is the cpu and voltage
everything was done at 200x10 with the ram at 1:1, 2-2-2-10 timings (basically, the same exact settings in the bios) and with no programs open aside from what i was using to bench. you will see that the newark is consistantly faster, though a very small amount, which goes with all the other testing done on the revE cores
first up, we have the everest memory benches. i took the average of three runs. i can't quite figure out why read and latency are better, but write went down a bit.
I tested the msi k8n neo platinum first. it booted with bios 1.6 with no problem. was at 2.4ghz, and 1.36v in the bios, which makes me think it defaulted to 1.4v instead of the 1.35v it should have been. One quirk to be aware of: I didn't see any option for Command Rate in the bios, and it defaults to 2T. once in windows, i switched to 1T without a problem and managed to run windows memtest for a while until i decided 1T wasn't about to kill anything
next up, then main rig's mobo, the dfi lanparty ut-nf3. it booted at 200x4 and .9v at first. i manually set it to 200x12 and 1.35v. curiously, i got a raid detect screen before getting into memtest. slightly confused, i went back to the bios and loaded optimized defaults, saved, then went back in and set everything i needed to set. it works!
here i have some screens of the core in operation
(i especially like the "venice" label given by CBID!)
onto the benches. same settings, same board, same ram. everything. only difference is the cpu and voltage
everything was done at 200x10 with the ram at 1:1, 2-2-2-10 timings (basically, the same exact settings in the bios) and with no programs open aside from what i was using to bench. you will see that the newark is consistantly faster, though a very small amount, which goes with all the other testing done on the revE cores
first up, we have the everest memory benches. i took the average of three runs. i can't quite figure out why read and latency are better, but write went down a bit.