Search results

I have looked into this a bit more and the only reason I can see that this is done is so you can easily move the config of the interface to another interface.

Yes 5505, I see lots of boiler plate configs this way and was just wondering why. Thanks for your help.

Hi, A quick question, why is a vlan created on the outside interface rather than the settings and security level assigned directly to the interface?

What router is it?

What ASA are you using? Also what is 192.10.0.x and 192.10.1.x used for?

Show local-host Ditch the pix asap and get a 5515 or if budget is tight a 5505. Just keep in mind the 5505 will go end of sale soon I think.

Ok, like I said, thanks for the input. What's with the slightly snide attitude here? Anyway, thanks to everyone who chipped in with advice.

Ok, thanks for the input.

Perfect, that's the answer I needed, thanks. To be honest the issues I had with auto negotiations was 100Mbps connections, thinking back it was always 1841 and 3560s that I had this with as well. This backs up what you said...

Strange you have never come across this then.

So when connecting a switch to a router you guys never set the speed and duplex on both sides? Many many times I have walked into "our internet is slow" or "we have strange issues with failed downloads" it's always been due to the router and switch having a speed and or duplex mismatch when set...

Cisco question I was setting up a 2960s 10G for iSCSI and was told that Cisco do not recommend setting the speed and duplex on each end of anything above 1Gbps. In the past anything like servers, switch to switch, switch to router I have always manually set speed and duplex to stop mismatch...

This is sounding more like a quick fix to a disk space issue to me.

I still use my 2 for VMware with a qnap nas for shared storage and 16GB of ram in each, it's fine but the cpu is a bit limiting.

Do you use 8.1 enterprise at work? If so take a look at windows2go

Do you have a proxy or some sort of NGFW or UTM?

Skylake and broadwell are due out at roughly the same time aren't they?

When do you think we should expect to see the next gen MacBook Pros?

My first pc os was dos 3.2 I think.

I think that patch was due to a security issue with the logon process, sounds like it may have caused you some issues.

How much did you pay for the CPUs?

Static ip and no default gatway

For a small company have you had a look at the sophos UTM firewalls?

Reverse proxy is also a good way.

It's probably a memory issue, have you run me memtest?

True, I think I am going to wait for a rMBA

I have a 2009 15" Dell XPS laptop that is starting to show its age, it has been a fantastic laptop but its a bit heavy and the core 2 CPU struggles a bit these days. I am thinking of giving this to the wife and getting a new laptop, I am looking at the "basic" 13" macbook pro, i5, 128GB SSD...

HL2 / CS Source changed my life forever. A long time ago now and I'd do anything to go back and do it all again.

Have a look at enterprise and datacenter license, its still expensive for office etc but it will knock your os license costs way down due to the cost per host rather than install.

The Pro 3 is a massive step up from the 2, we use them in work and I was never 100% on the 2 but the 3 is easily a laptop replacement with the type cover.

lol oh that takes me back.

you can also then do this with it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3cEhaJqXIg

If you use cacti with weather map you could have a live view weather map.

All bow down to my mighty broadband

Shenmue 2.... because we'll never see a 3

X1 carbon and Surface Pro 2 the carbon is actually lighter i think.

The thing about ASDM is it shows you the CLI commands it uses.

We have a Lync system in place and also Verba call recording software and for some odd reason any transferred calls are instantly dropped. Does anyone else use Verba?

why not use ASDM?

never really wanted one before, but now.....