Search results

thanks, I didn't knew pixel shifting reserved space was so big, then it makes now sense why this screens are advertised ass 26.5 and not 27", and also they must be real pixel size like 100 extra on vertical and horizontal.

oday looking at the screen, with light to clean it, I find this strange effect, the screen doesn't go all to the sides to the true bezel, it's like a double bezel, the real one, and then like 0.3cm of screen that is not used even when I put the windows in full screen, and that is part of the...

if you can't even see the screen controls at 0%, or you have a faulty panel or you have an extremely bright light focused on your screen. https://www.kitguru.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ASUS_ROG_Strix_XG438Q-BrightnessContrast.jpg all reviews of that monitor show the same, around 90 nits at...

Your display at 18% is about 160 nits if we follow the measured levels from tftcentral, even at 0% is almost 100 nits lol https://i.imgur.com/fiV2ivl.png

sure, thanks for telling me what's my kind of scenario is and what me and a lot of other people use and how we should interpret the results based on what you want to be and not what it really is Any other advice of how people should live their lives and how wrong they are because it doesn't fit...

rtings tests is a completely realistic scenario for desktop usage, it isn't for a media usage like a tv for netflix and some sporadic console gaming but desktop? yeah, it's a totally fair scenario hiding the taskbar won't save you from the programs UI elements which you will rack that without...

I talk about the ratio of cost per longevity for example, the QD oled burned to the point of being a trash display already without salvation because the CNN logo burned in in 1800 hours, costs 1300€ A 27 360 ulmb2 PG27AQN, that costs exactly the same 1300€, will last not 1800 hours, but about...

Oh surprise for everyone and pretty good news QD-OLED is burned, and completely destroyed (cnn logo), but suddenly, what it looked like burn-in in the LG W-OLED pannel, it isn't anymore and it was just dirt on the camera lens used to take the photos by rtings So, for the moment, W-OLED...

so, your point is as a new technology comes to the street, none of the old tech should be considered? hope you change of gpu to the top tier every new gen, have a 7800x3d, an oled 240hz because the old 120 doesn't cut it, etc must be great being so affluent and out of touch with society, but...

read again what I wrote not what you want to understand. An LCD can lasts over 40.000 hours, you can justify spending 1000€ for that and using it 3/4 years before changing it for the next flashy thing, and still have more than 50% of life expectancy left. But 1000€ for something that's...

That's it, it's the cost/benefit I sold my OLED because with the burn in tests, I can't afford to replace a display because after 2000 hours starts to burn in when I use my monitors about 5000 hours yearly, but when they last 10.000 hours and cost 200€, won't be a problem to change it every 2...

ironically, the #1 place is the most burned in display on the rtings test lol

yep, that was my point, the general consumer who is purchasing this monitors, is the complete opposite of the TV's buyers, so the rtings test was a reality check for everyone telling us in which point we are with this technology and how it isn't mature enough for desktop usage

I agree that it's the worst case scenario but for TV's for computer monitors their test is a pretty common usage, at least, it fits mine so much that I was forced to sell the display, because 1800 hours having that, would have last me less than a year.

5000 hours is absolutely nothing, even 10.000 hours as I said, my 144hz already have 16.000 hours of use in about 3 years, the OLED would have burned in less than year just with normal computer usage, I would have had the chrome static elements burned in for sure in 9 months lol

It doesn't need to be straight the more you use an application, the most some specific static pixels will start to degrade and lose the organic elements faster. Changing it to other programs, may or may not let those pixels be more dim than the rest of the screen making it the other parts of...

how so? their test are just using it X hours on content that may burn the screen, then seeing at which point it burns if they burned the screens under 1800 hours of usage, what do you think is going to happen to your display when you hit that 1800 hours of use with for example a multiplayer...

I just come to say that after looking at the latest rtings burn in test, and seeing they managed to have burn before hitting 2000 hours of use With the firmware bugs, and some of the extra oled annoyances like the flickering, finally decided to get rid of it, and sell it. oleds are great, but...

anyone knows if LG have any kind of community managers anywhere to ask them to fix the hdmi firmware bug that they fixed on displayport but never on hdmi?

Wouldn't a mouse with motion sync (vrr for mices) at 1000hz be enough? most of them already implement it and only adds 1ms of input lag, so don't need to purchase a razer 4k for 200€ motion sync should eliminate any kind of jitter from mices, and also, a lot of games, even super popular ones...

I wonder if the LG can't offer more brightness and colour accuracy on hdr as the other displays using this panel by design because of theirs was mishandled the engineering team like for example the lack of a better heatsink, they don't want to fuck with the customers of the panel and just offer...

My case was with a 60fps hard locked game with gsync enabled, first time I see the flickering

trying to play today a bit of noita flickering when gsync is on, normal when off.

Not a single game was designed with RT illumination in mind, so there is no reason to use RT in anyone, as any game that have RT, have added it as an "afterthought" without much time invested from the artists. As RT change a lot of shadows and lights altering the intended artists design from...

Has anyone found a way to make the colors look good? Specially when using HDR, It looks sobad side to side to a 27gl850b from 3 years ago, a lot of colors are just washed out or dull. Even a Dualup I have near it, have better vibrance and saturated colors and it's not a great panel at all...