I put an eVGA 9800GT in my wife's PC and woke up to the same thing right before xmas. Swapped it for a 9600GT with no issues, but seems odd this is plaguing multiple models?
Overall I have no complaints with Intel pricing, there is something for every budget, but I really hope we get some competition from AMD this coming year so we can see some price movement on that chart.
Since several people in this debate have stated that support from EA is relevant to the success of PhysX, I think it has a place. If the game has PhysX support but no one buys it due to DRM it kind of cancels out the positive, doesn't it?
1920x1200, runs everything I have thrown at it. Right now that would include LOTRO/Moria w/DX10 client, Fallout 3, The Witcher EE, Tomb Raider Underworld, Far Cry 2 and Crysis. With the exception of Crysis I have everything on high/very high with 2-8xAA and 16xAF and most titles stay near 60fps...
Bang for the buck right now would go to the Sapphire HD4870, $179 with an excellent non-reference cooler. I grabbed one last week and it's outstanding for the price.
Which claims, the well known DRM scheme they use on all new games or the numerous previews that show Cryostasis running at 35fps on a GTX260? If you honestly aren't aware of either of these then you aren't qualified to use the Internet any longer, please close your browser and go outside.
No one is taking it personal, we just all know that what you are claiming has no basis in reality. If you are happy with a stretched and blurry image that is great, but don't try and convince everyone it's equal to running at native res or that is just doesn't matter.
I'm glad you are okay with this but I think you are really only trying to convince youreself. The screenshots are irrelevant as they don't represent the stretched and blurry image your eyes are seeing on screen. No doubt your video card is rendering that image, but I doubt it is what you are...
Yea, DX10 is finally getting viable between hardware upgrades and developer progress. Far Cry 2 and the latest LOTRO client both provide very playble framerates under DX10 so go for it, no reason not to at this time.
I have the 100259L, with the fan on auto it ramps up with the slightest load but with it locked at 40% you can't hear it and temps never go above 54c on load. Had it for a week, very impressed so far. This was after returning a reference design 4870 due to heat and noise this summer.
It was spotty between releases sometimes, but Withcer EE, LOTRO:MoM, Far Cry 2, Fallout 3 and Tomb Raider Underworld are all fighting for my time right now and that is just the last few weeks.
EA, lol, any other debate and they would be getting slammed for all their heavy handed and evil tactics.
Bottom line, if nVidia thinks people are going to run out and buy PhysX enabled GPUs and then be happy with 35fps they are high.
The Vista black screen is only for 4850 X-fire users in general, so that is hardly the issue you paint it to be. And I just sold my 9800GTX+ and jumped to a 4870 and so far, I'm having fewer driver issues with the ATi card than I was with my nV card. Purely anecdotal of course, but my 4870 is...
If you can only get 35fps with a GTX sereis card, you do need two video cards. If that is the best they can do GPU based physics are in trouble. So far it has been a gimmick included in lame games.
Game looks meh and those numbers suck, if you can't get serious frame rates with a single GTX2xx then it's a joke. I was dragging my heels about selling my 9800GTX+ because of PhysX, now I'm glad I didn't wait.
Kyle posted the most realistic view of the physics situation in the thread, Havok...
Okay, I've been at it all day reinstalling Windows and loading apps. I've only half-heartedly tried to OC yet, but 3.4ghz barely moves the temps so there is plenty of headroom. I've played several hours of games at 1920x1200 including Far Cry 2, LOTRO w/Moria, The Witcher, Fallout 3 and Tomb...
I used the Windows XP SP2 driver direct from Intel's web site when I set up my WHS. Just unzip it and update the driver via device manager, should work just fine.
Using an MS LifeCam VX-5000 here, love it, real 64 bit drivers, doesn't load a bunch of junk background services, very well reviewed for it's low light capability.
Yea, I'd have to agree with some of the posters above, in general eVGA is a great company to deal with and there is way to much evidence to contradict that.