In my opinion, there is a subtle danger in the overuse of the word, in that as horrible as the Holocaust was, the word Nazi refers, in accepted historical use, to the members of the National Socialist German Workers Party, and to the policies and platforms of that extremist organization; using...
Has anyone had a look at The month of apple bugs?
My question is, why is everyone so down on these guys for "not notifying respective software makers before going public!" ?
If its acceptable procedure for Microsoft why not Apple?
Couple of problems problems with your little satire there, sparky. We weren't defending nazis or the NFL. Still, I'm glad the torture and murder of several million Jews could bring you a chuckle!
Now please die of gonorrhea and rot in hell. ;)
Sometimes, Jason, you just can't please anyone. I thought it made for an interesting read. Even more interesting, were the discussions it sparked. ;)
Its been said that we are our own worse critics. Don't judge your success based on individual responses. Sometimes, a single idea has worth...
I'm pretty put out with the NFL myself right now. I still love the sport of football. I understand that not everyone does, thats fine. I just don't understand how choice of sport has any bearing on one's character or intelligence any more than does one's choice of sundae toppings.
Personally I think people shouldn't throw around the word NAZI a a pejorative as it is an affront to people who actually suffered at their hands.
I'm not really sure what football ever did to you, but I'm sorry for whatever trauma you suffered. ;)
Yes, obviously whatever your ideology is, its obviously superior. As is evident in your post. I'm curious, did a Mormon football player drop you on your head or something?
Bizarre. IF you own a television of a certain size you cant have a party that centers around the tv? I'd challanege it in court. After the fact, of course, so that the NFL has to foot all the filing fee and then I'd counter sue for court costs and lawyer fees.
Sadly, I think you're wrong, Steve. WE are surronded by asshats who either A: think this is funny, good wholesome entertainment, or B: Think this is some sort of way to "stick it to tha MAN, civil liberties blah blah blah.
I would love to see your predictions come true, I just don't see it...
Quite frankly, I dont believe any of these companies is the "good guy". Sony just got too big for its britches this time around. Shame to see that good hardware (and it is good hardware) go to waste.
Not really. Companies spend money finding, promoting, and producing these artists. They deserve not only to recoup their losses, but to turn a profit.
Just as a disclaimer: I ain't no lawyer and I don't work for the RIAA.. If I disagree with your stance, please understand its not a personal...
The RIAA doesnt get a share of profits form proceeds of musical sales. The RIAA is suing on behalf of these artists, not the industry. Now the artist may indeed receive a smaller percentage compare to what the people who promote and produce them do, but they still lose money.
I can't say for sure, but I think thats not simply the cost of the IP (Intellectual property) but punitive damages as well. In other words, fining them extra as a punishment in an effort to curb such behavior.
As for arguments about who gets how much money per performance, I'm not sure thats...
Wouldn't matter. I'm a country fan. We only play in one chord. Actually I like listening to them backwards. Much less depressing that way. You get your wife, You get your farm back, you get your dog back....:D