Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As long as it's about 8GB of ram you should be ok. What voltages are you using? Also, I know many people are having to set looser timings to run all four sticks. That's just so much data throughput, and it's dependent on so many things to run smoothly, not the least of which is stable voltage from the motherboard to all four slots, so you might have to up the voltage a bit, too. Sometimes when running 4 sticks of that much ram a motherboard will slightly run under what you've set the voltage at. I've heard of this happening to people running 4x1GB setups, but I would imagine it's only worse in 4x2GB. Give looser timings a try and get back to me on what voltage you're running.
Also make sure all four sticks are good solo, and in pairs. Test one stick at a time, then test all four sticks in pairs, just to be safe, if you have time. Switch memory slots to to make sure all four of your slots are working perfectly. Just an idea, hope it helps.
Typically, yes. But that's not always the case. Some 4-4-4-12 ram might already be at its limit and loosening to 5-5-5-15 isn't going to net much more than a few MHz. Some 5-5-5-15 RAM has been known to push well past the next tier (e.g. DDR2-800 reaching past DDR2-1066 speeds).I was under the impression that RAM that is normally quoted as working at 4-4-4-12 (cas 4) would overclock better than RAM at normal 5-5-5-15 (cas 5). This is because 444-12 could easily handle 555-15 (looser timings) at higher Mhz. Is there any real truth to the CAS 4 vs CAS 5 being better than one another in overclocking?
I was under the impression that RAM that is normally quoted as working at 4-4-4-12 (cas 4) would overclock better than RAM at normal 5-5-5-15 (cas 5). This is because 444-12 could easily handle 555-15 (looser timings) at higher Mhz. Is there any real truth to the CAS 4 vs CAS 5 being better than one another in overclocking?
Very informative thread... Being a noob I learned a lot about RAM from this!
I thought I'd give you a final update on my 8 gb ram problem. Swapping around seemed just fine, upping the voltage proved to difficult to do. For some reason, voltages were greyed out in the bios (AMI). I called Geil and asked them for ideas for other timings, but he seemed pretty clear that upping the voltage was the necessary action. I contacted MSI through their website and someone got back to me very quickly with a new bios to upload. Their instructions were to upload the bios, clear the settings, and load the optimal settings. Then, I filled all the banks of ram, and it worked.
Ironically, I can't seem to change the voltage for memory still in the new bios. It's still greyed out and inaccessible. I can change some of the other voltages, although they are still greyed out. Anyway, I got this new computer to use it, so I'm going to move on from tinkering with the ram since it works.
Thanks for your help.
I know you're probably too experienced to make this oversight, but just to make sure, on some motherboards it's easy to miss the setting in the bios to change the memory settings from "auto", "optimal" or whatever, to "manual". I'm sure you probably already have, but I'm just double checking. I don't know why. It would be fun to push your ram. Geil makes good stuff, and if they say it can handle more voltage safely, you should be able to at least push the MHz up a little more, or maybe link it with your CPU???
Dear Customer, The reason they leave then seem like they are greyed out is so they do not really want users to start playing with voltages without knowing what they are doing. This may cause damage or issue with components so that is the reason. Thank you,
Oh, I'm fully capable of missing something painfully obvious....In this case, however, I did check the those alternatives. Maybe there is some combination of factors. I also asked MSI as a follow-up question about it. Here is the reply:
I don't about you, but I think America is a lot safer now...
Hey there guys.
I'm making a new build with 8gb ram included. My question is, is this ram ok for the build ?
Corsair 4 Gb (Kit 2x 2Gb) DDR2-SDRAM PC6400 5-5-5-18 - TWIN2X4096-6400C5 G
The specs are: Maximus Formula, Q6600. It's hard to find another good pair of 2x2gb in my country.
You have the MSI P6N Diamond, right? Listen to what MSI says about your board on their own website:
I just cut and pasted exactly what they typed. I believe the P6N platinum is a 680i, and supposed to be an overclocker's friend. You're supposed to be able to change voltages however the heck you want. Every 680i I know of was designed to be able to SPECIFICALLY AND PRECISELY tune your SLI graphics setup, CPU, AND your RAM. I have 680i, like some of my friends, and even those who have reference-based boards are able to adjust specific ram settings, including voltages, no matter what capacity or how many sticks they have in the machine.
Look for this screen and tell me if you're able to change ANY voltages there, not just your RAM's.
[FONT="Courier New"]
Current CPU Frequency 2413 Mhz
Current FSB Frequency 1067 Mhz
Current DRAM Frequency 800 Mhz
DOT Control choices(disabled, private 1%,
sergeant 3%, captain 5%,
colonel 7%, general 10%,
commander 15%.)
Intel EIST choices (enabled/disabled)
System Clock Mark choices(auto, linked, manual)
Advance DRAM Configuration [press enter]
separate page: choices set for overall manual or auto
if manual is selected, timing choices are shown as
auto or specific numbers for the usual tCL, tRCD, tRP, etc.
no voltage addressed there.
Adjust PCI-E Frequency 100 choices (100 -> 114)
CPU Voltage 0.00V grey/inaccessible
Memory Voltage auto grey/inaccessible
NB Voltage default (1.25v -> 1.5V)
grey but accessible]
SB Voltage 1.50 grey/inaccessible
FSB VTT Voltage 0% choices(1 -> max 20%)
grey but accessible]
Spread Spectrum Enabled
choices (enabled, disabled)
[/FONT]
I have a quick question, I'm new to more than 2 gigs of RAM and 64 bit OS's. I've read that Vista doesn't like more than 3 gigs of RAM installed until a hotfix is downloaded. Is this true for the 64 bit version too? If so, how should I proceed? I have (4) 2-gig sticks, so should I just plug in 1, boot to Vista to download the fix, and then install the rest of the RAM? If so, what is the patch/hotfix's name or number? Thank you all for the help.
I had 3 gigs of ram on my vista install. for the most part, the OS, a few apps open, and a game running on top of that takes up about 1.5 gigs of ram. I ended up taking out the extra 1gig because there was really no need for it.
2gigs is just about perfect.
If you want to brag about something, get 3-4gigs, but 8 gigs is totally useless on a desktop pc.
Some people have uses for more than 2 gigs of ram.
Yep. I know I will definitely use it. To say it's useless is a silly generalization. Once I get my 4GB ramdisk going I'll run circles around your 3-4GB rig in photoshop & premiere. As my sig. stats, I use my rig for gaming and for actual work, because I do a lot of memory/graphic intensive work. This will set my adobe programs free!!!
(ok, that was kinda cheesy... but still true.)
LOL...RAM disk sounds awesome though
I'm going to have to switch to 8gig. Since I work with photoshop and maya and having firefox open, 8gig is the definite answer. Already these applications eating up almost 4gig. When rendering or having a heavy file, 4gig is a joke. With 8gig, I don't have to worry about closing other programs while working.
I really think programs like Premiere and Pinnacle studio would take off when 8GB of ram is available. Rendering would go much faster, especially if you need more than one of those apps open at the same time. I frequently have premiere+photoshop or pinnacle studio+photoshop running simultaneously, and eight gigs will speed that up for sure.
Apps like that love processing power too.
That's why I also have a quad core overclocked to 3.2GHz (and I'll probably be able to push it even higher than that....) This thing is gonna fly right out my window when I get done...
Your only using a 17" monitor?
If you had a f' load of money you could get two of these, a workstation board, and load of memory too.
Yeah yeah... I know I'm the ghetto overclocker.
But it's one of the best 17" EVER. Over 2 years of heavy use, work/gaming/wife surfing internet, even a little tv watching.. and not a single dead pixel yet!!
I've tried to select everything I have with the best bang/buck factor, and I feel like I'm succeeding pretty well so far.
AND, I'm not making a server or a real serious superexpensive workstation with "workstation" processors. I just like having a superfast machine to do my "semi-pro" work plus gaming on. I have a 13x19 borderless 6-color HP printer and CS3 design premium. I use it a lot for school and side jobs. I want it to be fast, stable and reliable. I also use it for gaming, so I need it to be fast, stable, reliable, and maintain good temps, hence the 900 case. I think I've got a pretty good setup going. It'll just get a lil' better with 8GB in it. And the 4GB kits are $69 bucks right now!!! Plus I did the intel retail edge deal for the processor, and I used 64-bit vista from last year's retail edge. I'm pretty darned happy with what I got .... (and I'm ECSTATIC right now because I just slapped in a brand new BFG 8800GT ... YAHOOO!!!)
Anyhow. My next monitor will probably be dual 22" LCDs. I am pretty fond of the ultrasharps. That 8GB of ram will come in very handy when I'm running one big adobe app in each window.... or "working" on something in one window while playing a favorite game in the second...
so don't be too hard on me.
I got the Dell Ultrasharp 2407WFP a while ago... it's so nice. It's on a huge sale right now for $599. link.
If you don't need a nice panel there are other 1920x1200 24"ers for cheaper.
Before that I've been using a Dell ultrasharp 17" for 4-5 years. It looked something like this. And before that I was using a 15" NEC Multisync XV15+ from the mid 90's. And around that time too I was using a couple Sony Trinitrons.
OK...I just posted this in the OS forum, but then found this thread. Might be slightly more applicable here so I'll duplicate my post...
So I've been reading a little bit about RAMdisks. It seems you can improve the performance of your pc a bit by assigning some key portions of your system on the RAMdisk (pagefile, browser cache, etc.).
Well...then I started wondering...what if a guy got 8 gig of memory (now that its so dirty cheap) and assigned 4-5 gig worth to a RAMdisk. Then install a virtual pc on the RAMdisk? You could use the virtual pc for your normal everyday stuff (browsing, office, etc).
And yes I know there are limitations, problems such as you'd lose all data on ramdisk at shutdown. But you could back up the virtual pc image file to hard drive, and just keep your pc running 24x7. Anyways, assuming the obvious limitations were an acceptable trade-off...
1. Is it even possible to install a virtual pc on a RAMdisk (virtual drive)?
2. Would performance increase a lot (such as loading apps because you would have no hdd accessing)?
3. Has anyone tried anything like this before?
Hi, guys.I'm thinking about getting 8GB of RAM for my new system.Which one would you recommend?Corsair XMS2 DDR2 4GB (2X2GB) PC2-6400 (800MHZ) CL5 or G.Skill DDR2 4GB (2X2GB) PC8000 1000MHZ DUAL CHANNEL KIT?
I can get the corsair for 110(euros) and the g.skill for 125.Is it worth paying 15 more for the g.skill?Which one would be better for a system with 8GB?Anyone using any of the kits?
ram disk and install a whole game in there
I have had 8GB of ReaperX PC28000 (1000MHZ) running at 5-5-5-12 @ 1066 on my system, but I was getting instability problems and errors in Memtest.
I did some tests and found that one pair can run those specs at 4GB, while the other can't. So now I've got 4GB installed and it's running great and I really don't notice much of a difference. I sincerely doubt I would ever need to run Crysis and Photoshop and Firefox at the same time...
I was unsure about the performance issue, and whether I would notice a difference running 4GB 5-5-5-12 @ 1066 MHz or 8GB 5-5-5-15 (or 18) @ 1000 MHz (which should run ok according to the specs, although I haven't tested).
The only other activities I might need a lot of RAM for is when I edit home videos and make DVDs.
Specs are ~Q6600 G0 @ 3.6 GHz~Asus Maximus Formula Bios 0907~4 GB OCZ ReaperX HPC PC28000 1000MHz @1066 5-5-5-12~CoolerMaster Extreme Power 650w~
~EVGA 8800 GTX @ 626/1500/2000~Soundblaster Fatal1ty XtremeGamer~Samsung SyncMaster 245b 24"~Vista Ultimate 64
~WD Raptor 150 GB~WD 500 GB~LG DVDROM~Samsung DVD/RW~Thermalright Ultra120~
Well I got mine up and running last night, 8gigs of RAM are hard on a motherboard when you overclock. I left it mildly overclocked becuase it's completely stable, thanks too all that answered my questions about more RAM.
Bummer about that one set. Right now I've got all 8GB of mine stable (for now) at 1000MHz with stock 5-5-5-18 timings on 2.0v. I'm very impressed that this cheapo ram can do that..... Only .2v above stock voltage. I'm comfortable with that now that I have a good memory cooler on top of my 4 sticks. Should be ok. So far everything's running great.
I'll probably go for the abit IP 35 Pro or one of the P35 based Gigabyte mobos, unless Intel decides to release the Q9450 soon but that seems unlikely.What motherboard are you getting? Not all motherboards support the faster RAM. Certain intel chipsets only allow 800MHz ram, and others will support above 1000MHz.
I love Corsair, and I love G.Skill. Haven't had problems with either brand of product or either company for support. It's win-win whomever you choose. Need to know what mobo you're using though.
I have read that it is a waste. Why so?