Maybe someone mentioned this already, but looking at this page: http://www.hardocp.com/article/2015/06/24/amd_radeon_r9_fury_x_video_card_review/9#.VYuktle4SSo
It would appear to me that the FPS over time for Fury X tracks quite well with the 980 Ti, with no sudden, unexpected nosedives that would be indicative of the vram limit being breached and textures getting thrashed. This is so even in supposedly vram heavy games like GTA V and Dying Light. Does this mean the 4GB framebuffer thus far isn't a huge problem, or am I reading the graphs completely wrong?
It would appear to me that the FPS over time for Fury X tracks quite well with the 980 Ti, with no sudden, unexpected nosedives that would be indicative of the vram limit being breached and textures getting thrashed. This is so even in supposedly vram heavy games like GTA V and Dying Light. Does this mean the 4GB framebuffer thus far isn't a huge problem, or am I reading the graphs completely wrong?