Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's because only Rudy Giuliani can use 9/11 for self-promotion. Anyone else who even mentions it is tarnishing the most sacred thing ever in his eyes.I don't get it. It's not a bad thing, is it? Not a great marketing picture, but it's not offensive or bad in any way... Maybe I'm missing something. I just don't see anything wrong.
Now, the Marriott thing....
Sorry, not offended. There is zero branding in the picture. It could be anybody's cell phone on any carrier, and it's not displaying any particular features. And it's on their Facebook page where the only people who visit are probably already customers. They just wanted to have a cell-phone theme to the picture, since that is what they do.
And it was precisely the cellphone in the picture - since that is what they SELL - that ticked some people off and came across with a slop-bucket stink of opportunism and marketing.
It may seem like people making a mountain out of a molehill to me and you but the problem AT&T really faced down with today was the fratboy marketing majors apparently working there not fully grasping or recognizing when there's something emotionally-charged enough that it really rather be stayed away from. Nobody cares what the fuck BigCorp thinks about 9/11.
I don't know what phone it was. They weren't trying very hard to sell that cellphone if I don't know what it was.
Wait wait,I thought we were spreading the "no planes" meme, but now your saying its actually "no phones"?
#truthers-insidejob-nophones.
Are you being obtuse? why the fuck else would a CELLPHONE company have a cellphone in a tweet?
I completely forgot it was 11/9 yesterday...that golf course or the AT&T pic would have reminded me.
I'm offended people keep bringing this incident up but no one remembers other days like the Oklahoma city bombing. So how about this gets swept under the rug like everything else, it's almost as if there's a higher value on the lives of people that were in the WTC.
I'm offended people keep bringing this incident up but no one remembers other days like the Oklahoma city bombing. So how about this gets swept under the rug like everything else, it's almost as if there's a higher value on the lives of people that were in the WTC.
I thought it came off as a nice tasteful tribute. Marketing? Most everything is - the World Trade Center movie profited off the disaster. So did the movie about the plane.
Now, the Marriott thing....
Well, there was a higher value...because about 12 times more people were killed in the WTC attack than in the Oklahoma City bombing. Thousands dead versus hundreds dead has more impact, like it or not. I think, though, the fact that it was in New York is also the reason it's so much more observed. The media largely doesn't care what happens in the heartland, just what happens in the big cities.
Now THAT'S patriotic!
We all know terrorists hate coffee and muffins...
And puppies and kittens....
And Dale Earnhardt and Jesus!
*sings God Bless America*
Wasn't the OKC bombing "domestic terrorism"?
Wasn't the OKC bombing "domestic terrorism"?
Yes, but that was before the word "terrorism" became a tool for political manipulation and increased government power. If Waco and Ruby Ridge had happened 10 years later, I guarantee that Koresh and Weaver would have been called "terrorists". At the time, however, "militiaman" served the same effective capacity.
We apologize to anyone who felt our post was in poor taste. The image was solely meant to pay respect to those affected by the 9/11 tragedy.