Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tim-x said:i think most pro gamers use sennheiser hd555/595/600/650. food for thought.
tys90 said:5.1 in itself is a gimmick.
IDversusEGO said:speaking in terms of gaming or in general?
ZOMGWTFBBQ said:Allesandro MS-1s and call it a day.
I was speaking in terms of headphones, gaming or general. Digitalmind made a good point though, one that specifically applies to headphones. I can't tell a difference between sound placement using my 5.1 headphones or simililary priced headphones, I just like my 5.1s because of the extra things (solid construction, attatched quality mic, comfortable).IDversusEGO said:speaking in terms of gaming or in general?
Stereophile said:Allesandro makes very good headphones. Rebranded Grado if I'm not mistaken.
You actually get higher quality parts for the money w/ Allesandro than Grado.
Their SR-80 pricepoint gives you SR-125 components etc.
The good thing about them is they're low impedance and sound fine with a sound card.
Some good but high impedance headphones really need an amp to sound decent.
On 5.1 - Interesting because in reality, most people can process directionl sound. Now there aer circumstances that will trick a listener, but if I am standing in my yard with my eyes closed and have my kid run around me, I can tell where she is. Ever played MArco Polo as a kid (or really drunk adult)?digitalmind said:Theoretically, 5.1 is rubbish. We only have two ears, so we can't distinguish whether or not things come from behind or from in front anyways. So, theoretically, stereo should be able to produce the same placement feeling as a 5.1 setup can. However, sounds coming from behind us sound a bit different than sounds from infront, because of ear shapement. DSP's can't really create the same differences, as these are different for everybody. They can come very very close though, so a good stereo headphone will create the same placement feeling as a 5.1 setup, and often much better than a 5.1 headphone. With 5.1 headphones, you are stuffing much more technology in the same size casing for the same amount of money. That simply has to degrade it's quality.
If I would go for a gaming headphone, I'd pick one that is closed, bass heavy, and has a decent soundstage. Enter DT770 / Ath-A900.
(I own a DT770 and a A700, both would be great gaming headphones)
IDversusEGO said:On 5.1 - Interesting because in reality, most people can process directionl sound. Now there aer circumstances that will trick a listener, but if I am standing in my yard with my eyes closed and have my kid run around me, I can tell where she is. Ever played MArco Polo as a kid (or really drunk adult)?
On the headphones - closed is the way to go for gamin IMO. I have heard Audio Technica cans before and really liked them. Comfy and nice sound. I will probably get some 900 or 500 when I scrape the coin.
IDversusEGO said:I agree that surround sound headphones can't create a real surround sound, mainly due to the closenes of the drivers to your ears, I just thought you were saying 5.1 itself was bunk, not 5.1 headphones.
digitalmind said:Actually, I am saying it's sort of bunk, I'm saying that I don't understand why I can hear whether something comes from infront or from behind.
you2 said:Why do folks say a500 or a900 instead of a700? the a700 can be purchased for almost the price of the a500 in usa since ath now sells them in usa where the a500/a900 have to be imported ?
Dachink said:Audio Technica W5000
synergyo1 said:Apparently the A700 is the gimped one in the family. I won't elaborate since I don't remember the details.