That kind of goes against everything I've read.
5-year warranty, toggle NAND, better performance in most benchmarks, more peace of mind? Supposedly Plextor tests/burns in each drive for 20 hours prior to shipping to ensure an annual failure rate of only 0.5%...that's probably up there with the venerable Intel X25-M.
I'm not saying the M4 is a bad drive - far from it. I'm looking at it as a potential purchase along with the Samsung 830 and the Plextor. Just saying that your post seems very pro-M4 without being objective. Do you own one or something?
No I do not own an M4.. What I based my comment on was history.. Plextor in recent years hasn't been the best with post sales support.. Crucial on the other hand has been. Not to mention the metric fuck ton of people that do have the m4 with a very very low failure rate. I learned my lesson about SSD benchmarks from my Vertex 2.. You WILL NOT notice a performance increase between 2 decent drives, what you will notice is the amount of problems you have & how those problems are handled by the manufacturer. Also Crucial has a hell of allot more experience in tweaking the marvell controllers then anyone else at this point & long term reliability of the m3 has yet to be established.