Redsniper said:Where is the great singleplayer engine, shittiest multiplayer netcode ever option?
That would be the "C&C:Generals"-option, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Redsniper said:Where is the great singleplayer engine, shittiest multiplayer netcode ever option?
Akuma said:Good engine, crap game.
Staples said:EA buying the world again? Not surprising.
And for you guys who don't know, the UE3 has been licenced for at least 20 games. D3 for maybe 3 or 4 but they are all ID games (and thus not sold a license), Source 2 games that I know of and Cry engine zero.
Sir-Fragalot said:Well the source engine has been used in two other games which is more than the D3 engines been used for thus far. Its been used for Chronicles of Riddick and whatever that Vampire game was.
Sir-Fragalot said:Well the source engine has been used in two other games which is more than the D3 engines been used for thus far. Its been used for Chronicles of Riddick and whatever that Vampire game was.
DragonNOA1 said:I don't see anywhere where the Riddick game used the source engine. I call Bologna
planetary said:I will say however the end of the game was so freaking hard that I am now bald.
I am not a woman. I love women, but I am not one of them.DragonNOA1 said:If you are a woman that would be hilarious. As for now that is mildly amusing.
planetary said:I am not a woman. I love women, but I am not one of them.
Stiler said:What the hell is peoples problems with far Cry?
I found the game itself to be a lot more fun the most other fps games, you actually had AI that could be worth a damn, you had open enviroments instead of closed linear spaces.
The story was the only thing that was lacking, but most fps games have shits for stories too.
So tell me, what made far cry (the game, not the engine) so "bad?"
I liked far crys gameplay over many other general fps's of that year and before.
S1nF1xx said:My opinion is that the engine is an outstanding sucess. It came from an unknown developer out of the blue. It smacked around pretty much all other games at the time. The draw depth of it is simply amazing. What other game gives you such lush outdoor environments and allows you to snipe someone from almost a killometer away?
If you're talking about the engine being sucessful as in an id engine that is sold off to make countless games...well, I doubt we'll see a ton of Cryengine games. But the fact that an unknown company pulled off such a huge, sucessful game, with ZERO pre-release hype has impressed me.
Genocidal[v2] said:My reaons why I didn't like Far Cry.
AI, lame characters and story, incredibly stupid damage models, horrible vehicle physics..ect ect.
The eyecandy was nice, everything else was lame.
planetary said:I don't understand why you would say any of the things you just said. I think the only thing you said that was correct was that "the eye candy was nice.", other than that, I don't know where you are coming from.
The horrible vehicle physics was correct too. I am not sure if it was the physics but driving anything in that game felt just horrible. For such a good game, I don't know how they could have implemented possibly the worst driving experience this decade.planetary said:I don't understand why you would say any of the things you just said. I think the only thing you said that was correct was that "the eye candy was nice.", other than that, I don't know where you are coming from.