Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because Vista64 is meant to be more secure. So, if you feel the need to disable this feature, why didn't you just get Vista32 in the first place? You've essentially just paid for a steak with crab imperial on top, and then promptly scraped the crab imperial off.
Excellent comment.
Being annoyed by them is simply a weakness of character.
Excellent comment.
There are a lot of people disabling Vista restrictions at present under the mistaken belief that doing so somehow makes them 'hardkore' or perhaps 'power users'.
It doesn't do that. Disabling stuff like this is a rather silly knee-jerk, and that's about all.
The presence of these features doesn't cause harm. Being annoyed by them is simply a weakness of character. Their presence may well at some stage alert you to an unexpected or unnoticed intrusion you'd prefer to avoid. A skilled and capable user will learn to manage these features to ensure they have minimal impact. A less skilled and capable user will simply find a tweak which excises them from the system.
No, I'm not asking, how to... I'm telling you how to
In a shell with admin rights, enter:
bcdedit -set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
and yes, it's DD... no typo. Reboot and enjoy.
Per session disabling is quite simple for stuff which is appropriate for a testbed environment. The freeware tools which are basically constant comanions all have suitable versions under development, and if there's a problem involved with financing the signed driver then fans of those programs are making donations to assist the authors. If currently popular tools disappear it won't be because Vista has enhanced security by forcing signed kernel mode drivers. It'll be because either the authors are uunable to adapt to a changed environment or because the users are unwilling to support the product they use.
Sorry. I have no sympathy for your line of argument.
Nah, it's a crap comment. I've got 4GB of RAM. 'nough said.
And that must be the most ridiculous thing I ever read on any discussionboard since the early 90s... thanks, I needed a good laugh today and that was enough for a whole week.
Per session disabling is quite simple for stuff which is appropriate for a testbed environment.
How do you go about doing this "per session"?
I'm also pretty sure the command that kicked off this thread no longer works since SP1 has been deployed.
Because Vista64 is meant to be more secure. So, if you feel the need to disable this feature, why didn't you just get Vista32 in the first place? You've essentially just paid for a steak with crab imperial on top, and then promptly scraped the crab imperial off.
Per session disabling is quite simple for stuff which is appropriate for a testbed environment. The freeware tools which are basically constant comanions all have suitable versions under development, and if there's a problem involved with financing the signed driver then fans of those programs are making donations to assist the authors. If currently popular tools disappear it won't be because Vista has enhanced security by forcing signed kernel mode drivers. It'll be because either the authors are uunable to adapt to a changed environment or because the users are unwilling to support the product they use.
Sorry. I have no sympathy for your line of argument.