5150Joker
Supreme [H]ardness
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2005
- Messages
- 4,568
lol
Great - and as a comment for you - everything you have stated is subjective (feel free to re-read your comments) and unless you actually state something that's objective, your opinion is just that - an opinion.
How do your "years of experience with arma 3" or the fact that you have "ran servers" equate to your opinions being of more value or weight than anyone else's ?
I'm not being aggressive or antagonistic to you - just pointing out we're both expressing opinions. And other than stating you have claimed experience with the game and you've ran servers for it, you have actually stated nothing of any value to me in assessing your opinion.
How does your background compare to mine and why would I place value on your opinions ?
What do you know about me and my experience with Arma 3... ?
Do you get my point ?
Feel free to continue to dislike Arma 3 and I'll feel free to continue to like it as much as I see fit.
Happy gaming
You posted useless links trying to build credibility for a clunky game that still pretty much only uses a single core, has some of the worst collision physics I've ever seen in any game, vehicle handling which is abysmal and again clunky (the sports hatch drives like it's on ice), and soldiers which become fatigued after jogging 20 meters with the gun swaying in every direction. Any military depending on Bohemia must be a joke because there is nothing complex or realistic about ARMA, it's a broken game and engine.