Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fedex5000 said:nvidia is going to release faster cards, but we already have something faster, the x850s true?
BossNoodleKaboodle said:Its clocked higher and ATI's driver optimizations don't let it do trilinear filtering AND it doesn't support PS 3.0, so why bother buying the old technology ATI pushes as new? Get a 6800U and kick its all all over the place with upcoming games.
BossNoodleKaboodle said:Its clocked higher and ATI's driver optimizations don't let it do trilinear filtering AND it doesn't support PS 3.0, so why bother buying the old technology ATI pushes as new? Get a 6800U and kick its all all over the place with upcoming games.
Originally Posted by BossNoodleKaboodle
Its clocked higher and ATI's driver optimizations don't let it do trilinear filtering AND it doesn't support PS 3.0, so why bother buying the old technology ATI pushes as new? Get a 6800U and kick its all all over the place with upcoming games.
Fedex5000 said:nvidia is going to release faster cards, but we already have something faster, the x850s true?
Fedex5000 said:nvidia is going to release faster cards, but we already have something faster, the x850s true?
Quoted for truth...jacuzz1 said:Flame bait and you should be banned
Fedex5000 said:i don't want to buy a new pcie card and couple months later they are old, not capable of running latest games.
Fedex5000 said:nvidia is going to release faster cards, but we already have something faster, the x850s true?
jacuzz1 said:Flame bait and you should be banned
Jerunk said:What's that? Video cards are getting faster? Shit.
Fedex5000 said:nvidia is going to release faster cards, but we already have something faster, the x850s true?
Fedex5000 said:i don't want to buy a new pcie card and couple months later they are old, not capable of running latest games.
Moloch said:
I see you have raised the bar for how much bullshit can be packed in one post.
3dmark 05 doesn't agree with the 6800U kicking it all over
Neither does far cry, or any other benchmark.
Can I quote you in the years to come when the X850 is still faster than the 6800 ultra?
Nvidia STILL can't match the fsaa quality of the 9700 pro for christs sake.
Speaking of old technology
Moloch said:
I see you have raised the bar for how much bullshit can be packed in one post.
3dmark 05 doesn't agree with the 6800U kicking it all over
Neither does far cry, or any other benchmark.
Can I quote you in the years to come when the X850 is still faster than the 6800 ultra?
Nvidia STILL can't match the fsaa quality of the 9700 pro for christs sake.
Speaking of old technology
Fedex5000 said:i don't want to buy a new pcie card and couple months later they are old, not capable of running latest games.
Astra said:Don't forget about 6600 cards with 2 gpus on board. /these cards are going tobe faster than 6800 ultra and cost less.
BLenderhedd said:Not even as fast as a 6800GT for about the same price.
Stupid NOOB post....
For DX9 yes they are much better but in Open GL Nvidia Cards kick Atis ass.I also want to say that i feel that ATI is now the better choice for OpenGL as well. It just plays the games better, better picture, faster, and im able to use higher levels of AA and AF
Old fucking news.BossNoodleKaboodle said:I think you just beat me.
have a look. http://techreport.com/etc/2004q2/filtering/index.x?pg=1
From the TR article:
What to make of all this?
Whatever the merits of ATI's adaptive trilinear filtering algorithm, ATI appears to have intentionally deceived members of the press, and by extension, the public, by claiming to use "full" trilinear filtering "all of the time" and recommending the use of colored mip map tools in order to verify this claim. Encouraging reviewers to make comparisons to NVIDIA products with NVIDIA's similar trilinear optimizations turned off compounded the offense. Any points ATI has scored on NVIDIA over the past couple of years as NVIDIA has been caught in driver "optimizations" and the like are, in my book, wiped out.
That's a rather broad statement.burningrave101 said:You dont really need much AA at higher resolutions like 1600x1200 and at lower resolutions 8xS beats anything ATI supports for FSAA.
No way, it blows GT off....BLenderhedd said:Not even as fast as a 6800GT for about the same price.
Moloch said:Old fucking news.
I dont care if ati lied about filterting, there optimized filtering looks better than nvidias, and thats all I care about.
BossNoodleKaboodle said:LOL don't forget ATI's catalyst control pannel. Click AI on high and all it does is set the quality to crap to up the FPS. I guess ATI is good if you want high frame rates and don't care about image quality much. Trickle down tech is what consumer computing is all about, and Nvidia PWNS ATI in the workstation cards, and as far as creating new technologies, so naturally their actual GPU cores are more advanced. ATI is even backing out of the consumer market according to the latest news. They couldn't hardly get any of their cards out to market on time, so they may be going the way of 3dfx. Too bad 3dfx isn't still around instead, as they were innovative as well as Nvidia.
Moloch said:Old fucking news.
I dont care if ati lied about filterting, there optimized filtering looks better than nvidias, and thats all I care about.
That's a rather broad statement.
Maybe in dark games, but in bright games you still need AA.
8Xs also happens to be slow as molassas, and makes games blurry.
ThomasE66 said:Guys, don't feed the trolls
BossNoodleKaboodle said:LOL don't forget ATI's catalyst control pannel. Click AI on high and all it does is set the quality to crap to up the FPS. I guess ATI is good if you want high frame rates and don't care about image quality much. Trickle down tech is what consumer computing is all about, and Nvidia PWNS ATI in the workstation cards, and as far as creating new technologies, so naturally their actual GPU cores are more advanced. ATI is even backing out of the consumer market according to the latest news. They couldn't hardly get any of their cards out to market on time, so they may be going the way of 3dfx. Too bad 3dfx isn't still around instead, as they were innovative as well as Nvidia.