![[H]ard|Forum](/styles/hardforum/xenforo/logo_dark.png){kind=logo}
nst6563 said:
Dion said:
Netrat33 said:
Exactly, had this system been $150 MAYBE I would have bought it then, shit after seeing Zelda screens(really the only title I was even interested in after all the beautiful trailers) I would have a hard time justifying $100 for the system, graphics are important to an extent, and Nintendo pushed past that boundary in my opinion, maybe I will pick up Zelda when it's in the Game cube bargain bin and I will buy a used cube to play it, this Zelda was what I expected when WindWaker came out(another MEGA let down, fucking cell shading)I hate to say it but I can't stand Nintendo anymore, this game was delayed and delayed and delayed, and after all that time they couldn't make it look better then it is now and I KNOW the hardware is capable of it(see RE4)Dion said:
Dion said:
I doubt that, but PS2 will still have a huge fan base that don't have next gen consoles who will think it still looks amazing.Netrat33 said:
CodeX said:Fixed.
That game does look like crap, but cell shading can look damn good. How about not forming opinions on something you know nothing about.
back. You can use them in your next post.CodeX said:Fixed.
That game does look like crap, but cell shading can look damn good. How about not forming opinions on something you know nothing about.
Cell shading done right:
Cell Shading done wrong:
) why the hell does this shit happen.
nst6563 said:
not me, i dont carejon_k said:
I don't know, but Factor 5 (the guys behind the Rogue Squadron series) left their corner at Nintendo due to the fact that the Wii was more of a "Gamecube 1.5" (yes, quoted) than a brand new console.slowbiz said:
That sounds like the same criticism given to another now-popular video game system in 2004, yes? Just change "Wiimote + nunchuk" to "stylus," and I think we can see the downfall of that kind of statement's credibility and foresight.The18thLetter said:
Interesting. Where do you live? My target had 69, and the timing would have been just about right.Dan UCF said:
And what games are fueling some of the popularity you speak of? Nintendogs, Trauma Center... err... a little help?Klintor said:
The18thLetter said:
HRslammR said:
Dion said:
<- This is us. <- This is Sony. <- This is Nintendo.andypnb said:
Aelfgeft said:
nst6563 said:
Aelfgeft said:I've been chuckling throughout this entire thread. Nintendo is a company with a reputation for innovation, new ideas, and fresh concepts in their consoles. Anyone who has owned their various systems (yes, including the Virtual Boy) realizes this. Yes, the graphics of the Sega Genesis were superior to the Super Nintendo. Who won out, though? Find me a PS1 game that is in nearly as much demand as Mario Party. I can never find that cartridge at local resale shops, and when I do, it has a 30 dollar MINIMUM price tag.
The key problem is that we're [H]ard gamers, and we're demanding graphics. We've gotten so used to benchmarks, overclocking, and frames per second, that when we don't have Pixel Shader 3.0 on our screens, we deem a game or system a failure.
Meanwhile, Nintendo remembers resurrecting the video game industry in the 1980s.
Meanwhile, the Game Boy is still the most successful handheld in video game history.
Meanwhile, the DS is beating Sony's button-popping pocket pal.
...meanwhile, Nintendo knows that Pong was a huge success, with nothing but white pixels.
And we're all sitting here discussing the graphics of the most legendary RPG series ever.
Shinryu said:
Composite. Nintendo is sold out of Component cables (shipping next week) and component/svid cables are not avaliable anywhere for the wii.joemama said: