/dev/null
[H]F Junkie
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2001
- Messages
- 15,182
As an eBay Associate, HardForum may earn from qualifying purchases.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. You need a SAS controller if your motherboard doesn't have it (which most likely it doesn't). The connector may look similar, but SAS has an extra 7 pins on the other side of the connector (where SATA normally has a gap).okay call me a nub but I am not really familiar with SAS drives... can you just plug it into the sata port on your mb? I can't find much good information online.
Not quite...this has SAS: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130136Holy shit! Hot as hell, these are great drives. I believe they were EOLed to make room for the 450GB 15K variant.
You WILL need a specialized RAID controller to handle these drives, Harkov. There isn't a consumer-class motherboard in existence that has SAS ports on board. Look to drop at least $200 on a two-port SAS-capable RC, and up to $400+ for 4+ port that can do more than just RAID 1 or 0.
Storage DevicesNot quite...this has SAS: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813130136
It says on the box. Also says on MSI's website: http://www.msicomputer.com/product/p_spec.asp?model=K9A2_Platinum&class=mb
The two red ports are SAS, the purple ones are SATA.
I think the Velociraptor smokes this drive in single user scenarios but gets killed in multi-user scenarios. It also has a much higher power draw if that sort of thing matters to you. It's a bit louder as well. It all depends on how you are going to use the drive. The price is tempting but the purchase of controller card is a turn off for me.
Based from personal experience it's fast either way, having used them in servers.
Access time, definately but you're talking 1.something ms difference. I've used both and the only time I noticed a real difference between the two drives was when using a higher end caching controller for the SAS drive. Desktop use didn't show enormous differences between the two before changing controllers. I guess I just feel the need to defend the poor velociraptor. If I had my own SAS controller I would jump on this deal. At $150, this is definately better bang for the buck ( I would buy two ). I don't think you'll feel the difference all that much depending on the task at hand during desktop use.10k<15k
I would be so in for this if I didn't just get 4 15k fujitsu's for about 430 which was a sweet deal still. Does anyone know which cables I need to make this work on my perc 5/i, I currently have the 1 -> 4 adaptor without power one it, do I need to get the cables that have combined power/data?
No you are remembering right. The benchmark numbers will show the SAS drive getting it's ass handed to it in single user benches but the tables are turned when the drive is called upon to handle the tasks it was designed for.Aren't these drives tuned for server performance and would get smoked at desktop stuff by a raptor because of it? I remember reading an SCSI drive review a while back and only one out of all of the SCIS drives had a desktop type mode that made it competative. Maybe im remembering wrong.
you're exactly rightAren't these drives tuned for server performance and would get smoked at desktop stuff by a raptor because of it? I remember reading an SCSI drive review a while back and only one out of all of the SCIS drives had a desktop type mode that made it competative. Maybe im remembering wrong.
I would be so in for this if I didn't just get 4 15k fujitsu's for about 430 which was a sweet deal still. Does anyone know which cables I need to make this work on my perc 5/i, I currently have the 1 -> 4 adaptor without power one it, do I need to get the cables that have combined power/data?
No you are remembering right. The benchmark numbers will show the SAS drive getting it's ass handed to it in single user benches but the tables are turned when the drive is called upon to handle the tasks it was designed for.
Quick head to head: http://www.storagereview.com/php/be...&devID_0=321&devID_1=366&devID_2=360&devCnt=3Link?
I searched for the model # on the ebay auction in google with site:storagereview.com & google didn't return anything.
Quick head to head: http://www.storagereview.com/php/be...&devID_0=321&devID_1=366&devID_2=360&devCnt=3
**Your search failed because the model number was for the SAS version. Storagereview posted the review for the UltraWide 320 (ST3300655LW). Same hardware except for the interface.
Yeah that drive ain't green. But come on, this is the [H] man!Thanks for the link. Since I do not do gaming, but do a ton of i/o's (shared storage between multiple boxes, etc) I'm guessing the iometer results are probably more applicable. YMMV
In any case at ~ 1/2 the price for a velociraptor (after cashback) it might just be worth getting two. The only way it _REALLY_ loses for me is on the power front. I'm tempted to stay away from it on that respect alone.
SATA-->SAS not the other way around.Wait, I thought all SAS drives could be plugged into a SATA port, you just wouldn't get any of the SAS specific features if you did that. Or was it SATA drives could be plugged into a SAS port without issue?
Dunno about you, but I can't hear our SAS drives thanks to our 15000rpm fans at work.Just an FYI for folks considering high RPM drives out there. It is known in the IT industry that if you expose your ears to an environment with high RPM drives (such as using them in your desktop computer) it can damage your hearing. These are enterprise drives, designed to be in a datacenter. OSHA recommends wearing hearing protection if you are exposed to them more than 15 minutes a day. When they start to wear out, they often can sound about as loud as a jet turbine, or at least remind you of one.
Just an FYI for folks considering high RPM drives out there. It is known in the IT industry that if you expose your ears to an environment with high RPM drives (such as using them in your desktop computer) it can damage your hearing. These are enterprise drives, designed to be in a datacenter. OSHA recommends wearing hearing protection if you are exposed to them more than 15 minutes a day. When they start to wear out, they often can sound about as loud as a jet turbine, or at least remind you of one.
Just an FYI for folks considering high RPM drives out there. It is known in the IT industry that if you expose your ears to an environment with high RPM drives (such as using them in your desktop computer) it can damage your hearing. These are enterprise drives, designed to be in a datacenter. OSHA recommends wearing hearing protection if you are exposed to them more than 15 minutes a day. When they start to wear out, they often can sound about as loud as a jet turbine, or at least remind you of one.
Yeah that drive ain't green. But come on, this is the [H] man!
Just an FYI for folks considering high RPM drives out there. It is known in the IT industry that if you expose your ears to an environment with high RPM drives (such as using them in your desktop computer) it can damage your hearing. These are enterprise drives, designed to be in a datacenter. OSHA recommends wearing hearing protection if you are exposed to them more than 15 minutes a day. When they start to wear out, they often can sound about as loud as a jet turbine, or at least remind you of one.
I have to agree here, the 15K drives are WAY quieter than the 10K screamers. The 10K drives are the ones that will really hurt your ears. I haven't heard a 15K drive fail or one that was on it's way out so I don't know if it sounds worse at that point like a previous poster mentioned, but working you barely hear the spindle. The head seek is another story but nothing that would hurt your ears. YMMV.What frequency ranges? I have 8 36GB 15K's in my box right next to me and they're plenty quiet.
What frequency ranges? I have 8 36GB 15K's in my box right next to me and they're plenty quiet.