I currently have a 120GB Seagate 7200.7 SATA HDD that houses everything. I think it's one big partition (haven't been home in ages so I don't know).
I am planning to buy a 320GB Seagate 7200.9 (or 10, whatever). Also SATA.
I use my computer for 2 primary things.
1: Photoshop. I know I should have like a raptor and a couple more gigs of RAM but I can't deal with those expenses now. (Just bought some new glass). I work with 6MB RAWs that convert to ~40MB 16bit TIFFs (that probably open to about 700MB in photoshop).
2. Music. I use iTunes to rip ALAC (lossless) from images of CDs. I use iTunes to serve these CDs to my upstairs laptop which is connected to a decent Head/Hi-Fi system. (DAC, Tube Amp, etc the works)
With the heavy disk usage (only 1GB of RAM, moving to 2 soon enough) I plan on giving photoshop a lot of swap space.
I am considering this.
Windows+Programs on 120GB
5GB Partition on 320GB dedicated to Swap (photoshop and windows).
The rest of the 320GB dedicated to music and image storage (50+CDs in ALAC takes up a lot)
I figure this way because I should have my programs and swap on different HDDs, therefore theoretically improving bandwidth (two needles to "work" instead of only one).
However, I'm unsure if I should put the Windows and Progarms on the 320GB and have the swap on the other. The 320GB should be marginally faster with higher density and more buffer (16MB). Would that benefit swap or windows/programs more?
Thanks!
I am planning to buy a 320GB Seagate 7200.9 (or 10, whatever). Also SATA.
I use my computer for 2 primary things.
1: Photoshop. I know I should have like a raptor and a couple more gigs of RAM but I can't deal with those expenses now. (Just bought some new glass). I work with 6MB RAWs that convert to ~40MB 16bit TIFFs (that probably open to about 700MB in photoshop).
2. Music. I use iTunes to rip ALAC (lossless) from images of CDs. I use iTunes to serve these CDs to my upstairs laptop which is connected to a decent Head/Hi-Fi system. (DAC, Tube Amp, etc the works)
With the heavy disk usage (only 1GB of RAM, moving to 2 soon enough) I plan on giving photoshop a lot of swap space.
I am considering this.
Windows+Programs on 120GB
5GB Partition on 320GB dedicated to Swap (photoshop and windows).
The rest of the 320GB dedicated to music and image storage (50+CDs in ALAC takes up a lot)
I figure this way because I should have my programs and swap on different HDDs, therefore theoretically improving bandwidth (two needles to "work" instead of only one).
However, I'm unsure if I should put the Windows and Progarms on the 320GB and have the swap on the other. The 320GB should be marginally faster with higher density and more buffer (16MB). Would that benefit swap or windows/programs more?
Thanks!