I think that pointing out the flaws and making JT look like a total jackass is not good for his image. Regardless of whether not he is a lawyer I think that pointing out the flaws in his argements as well as his logic is not going to support his anti-game movement at all. If anything it should be our job to try and convince people that the gamng comunity is not a group of violence zombies but real people who don't go out in the street and start hurting people.While I know my previous posts have just really been updates to the situation and the t-shirt thing (hehe) the points that have been presented about responsibilty for violence are detrimental to JT and his ideals. Also making a valid argument against JT only gives him more validity. If his remarks aren't taken seriously then he will eventually fade away out of the spotlight.