Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I remember the day when I got my hands on the x800xt pe, right when they were released.. costed me $700+. Oh those were the days, that card was beastly.
We all have new gaming rigs.. this is the [H].
Sorry I actually use PCs, not sit around and run tests on them all day. 4GB on Vista 64 has been a very nice performance increase for me and everyone else I talk to that has tried it.
They were never 700. The highest retail they were up to $560, at least that was on Newegg.
don't listen to people telling you to upgrade you ram. Games are almost 90% GPU dependent, the rest CPU, as long as you got 2 gigs of ram, it doesn't matter. There have been several tests showing no improvements in Crysis performance going from 2 gig to 4 gig ram.
ok if u like to shut eveything down then play crysis with 2 gigs... go for it
with my 4 gigs... i can leave alot of stuff running in the background and fire up any game and see no performance hit...
try that with vista 64 and 2 gigs of ram...and enjoy the slide show and load times
Yeah on Vista 64, 4 gigs I would say is the good stuff, I can leave a lot of stuff running in the background and still enjoy a game.
Ever heard of the placebo effect? Of course it seems faster to you because you've paid the money and that's what you want to believe. Also, like I said, in some cases it will be faster, just not worth the extra money faster. Oh and btw in regards to those PC World tests, they were tests using real world apps, the same apps you, myself and everyone else uses such as IE, Firefox, Photoshop, Adobe, etc.
Also, I see a lot of people saying it's only $40 to go up another 2gigs, and of course that's entirely dependent upon what RAM you're getting....but even if we agree it's $40 then to some it's not worth paying even $40 for 2/10ths of a second here or there. Now if it was $10 then maybe it'd have a cost to value ratio worthwhile. But that's just my opinion of course. Some people may find every little way they can get more speed no matter what the cost it's worthwhile. I personally don't see that it's worth it though and it just so happens the experts such as PC World and the PC vendors (at least the ones I spoke to) agree with me.
well then the experts have no idea what they are talking about... i have had 2 gigs under vista64 and 4 gigs under vista..... so i know the difference first hand..and i can leave whateva i want running and run whateva i want.... full freedom..... and i am future proof....more demanding games wanna suck up more ram... its there for them.
and its cheap to get 4 gigs... so why the hell would anyone stick with 2 gigs...What are u going to wait till ram prices go UP to but it then?
your argument makes no sense.... you think when the games coming out this year will need LESS resources or more..
Ever heard of the placebo effect? Of course it seems faster to you because you've paid the money and that's what you want to believe. Also, like I said, in some cases it will be faster, just not worth the extra money faster. Oh and btw in regards to those PC World tests, they were tests using real world apps, the same apps you, myself and everyone else uses such as IE, Firefox, Photoshop, Adobe, etc.
Also, I see a lot of people saying it's only $40 to go up another 2gigs, and of course that's entirely dependent upon what RAM you're getting....but even if we agree it's $40 then to some it's not worth paying even $40 for 2/10ths of a second here or there. Now if it was $10 then maybe it'd have a cost to value ratio worthwhile. But that's just my opinion of course. Some people may find every little way they can get more speed no matter what the cost it's worthwhile. I personally don't see that it's worth it though and it just so happens the experts such as PC World and the PC vendors (at least the ones I spoke to) agree with me.
Its got nothing to do with placebo effect. I can assure you that I am not bullshitting about 4GB being better just because I paid for it. I am super critical of everything I buy, if there was no big difference, I would be telling everyone 4GB on Vista 64 is a waste. While you are busy reading up in PC World like its some kind of Bible, I've actually done the 2GB -> 4GB move myself, and known a lot of people online and in person that did the same thing and they ALL were happy with it. Especially with a Quad Core setup, 4GB gives you a lot more usability with multitasking. Anyone who pays for a Quad Core and a GeForce 8800 video card is just gimping themselves with 2GB of RAM if they are running Vista 64. Why buy the Quad Core and a 8800 in the first place if you do not want a system that runs damn fast all the time, with apps open, in everything you do? The $40 spent on RAM is a bonus for everything, while those 4 cores and great video card will rarely get to full stretch their legs. Vista is a RAM whore, if you want to game on 2GB you need to be very anal retentive about making sure everything possible is closed down before running RAM heavy games, and even then you might get some swap file action on 2GB.
Where's the love for 3GB?? ='(
lol i remember when 1gb was enough...oh those where the days.
also 600$ 6800gt's
and sli coming out...
i feel old and i built this computer 4 years ago
Where's the love for 3GB?? ='(
What do you need Vista for anyways?
That would disable dual-channel, and my God people! Look... show me numbers, on XP, where 4GB improves anything significantly over 2GB. To the guy who keeps bringing up how wonderful 4GB is in Vista: I'm talking XP because the OP is running XP! What do you need Vista for anyways?
We already established the OP was fine with 2GB. The conversation has drifted since then.
I posted my list of games, i'm still waiting to hear what the OP thinks of them.
Its a long list . Haven't heard of most of them, but willing to check them out. I have a long list of games to checkout now, and very little time to play. Hell, I got this new PC on Monday, and baught Bioshock at the same time. I haven't even loaded Bioshock yet ;(. I'm itching to though.