So, I'd like to thank 10e, GTOViper, Jim Robbins, gtg465x, et al. for their oft long-winded but ultimately informative reviews.
Of course, if I get my display and think it's awful, I'll be writing you all nastygrams. j/k
The following monitors were considered in my process:
HP 2408H
Gateway FHD2400
BenQ FP241W
BenQ G2400WD
BenQ T241W
Dell 2408WFP
Doublesight DS-263N
Samsung 245BW
Samsung 245T
Samsung T240
Samsung ToC T240HD (Sadly, this one is brand new so there has been almost no literature on it)
Acer P243WAid
NEC LCD2470WNX-BK
I confess to letting Trusted Reviews talk me out of the BenQ G2400WD for reasons of backlight bleed issues. Even if they're marginally less than the V2400W, with the 10% discount offered through this site combined with free shipping, it was a no-brainer.
I would like to throw out a question to anybody who bothers to read this thread. My monitor for the last 4 years was a Dell 2005FPW, which from everything I've read seems to be a bit of a legendary 20" LCD gaming display.
Do I have reason to believe that the BenQ will be at least on level with the Dell in terms of picture quality and latency? Everybody says input lag on the G2400WD / V2400W is minimal to the point of going unnoticed. I hope that's true. I also hope the picture quality is comparable. I know the Dell is old but I've always thought it looked beautiful, so either I'm not picky or it really is a legendary monitor.
One other thing: 1900x1200. I'm excited to run games and HD discs at that resolution, but is the "Fill" option really worthwhile on the V2400W? I mean, does it look distorted or does it actually upscale it accurately? I'm ignorant as to how technology works in this arena. What I'm really asking is if all my older games that don't support 1900x1200 will look good at say, 1680x1050, upscaled to "Fill" the V2400W.
If I have other questions, I'll use this thread to post them. Big thanks to whoever started this site. I cannot (literally) believe how much information there is in the archives.
Of course, if I get my display and think it's awful, I'll be writing you all nastygrams. j/k
The following monitors were considered in my process:
HP 2408H
Gateway FHD2400
BenQ FP241W
BenQ G2400WD
BenQ T241W
Dell 2408WFP
Doublesight DS-263N
Samsung 245BW
Samsung 245T
Samsung T240
Samsung ToC T240HD (Sadly, this one is brand new so there has been almost no literature on it)
Acer P243WAid
NEC LCD2470WNX-BK
I confess to letting Trusted Reviews talk me out of the BenQ G2400WD for reasons of backlight bleed issues. Even if they're marginally less than the V2400W, with the 10% discount offered through this site combined with free shipping, it was a no-brainer.
I would like to throw out a question to anybody who bothers to read this thread. My monitor for the last 4 years was a Dell 2005FPW, which from everything I've read seems to be a bit of a legendary 20" LCD gaming display.
Do I have reason to believe that the BenQ will be at least on level with the Dell in terms of picture quality and latency? Everybody says input lag on the G2400WD / V2400W is minimal to the point of going unnoticed. I hope that's true. I also hope the picture quality is comparable. I know the Dell is old but I've always thought it looked beautiful, so either I'm not picky or it really is a legendary monitor.
One other thing: 1900x1200. I'm excited to run games and HD discs at that resolution, but is the "Fill" option really worthwhile on the V2400W? I mean, does it look distorted or does it actually upscale it accurately? I'm ignorant as to how technology works in this arena. What I'm really asking is if all my older games that don't support 1900x1200 will look good at say, 1680x1050, upscaled to "Fill" the V2400W.
If I have other questions, I'll use this thread to post them. Big thanks to whoever started this site. I cannot (literally) believe how much information there is in the archives.