Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mine's running at 3.8ghz Compiling is so much faster ... I was surprised, even at stock 2.66ghz it felt a lot smoother in Windows than my Core 2 Quad QX6700 2.66ghz.
probaby because of dynamic oc'ing, stock i7 920 runs at 2.8ghz actually when under load (more, if the load is on one core only)
Upgraded from X3350 @3.2 to i7 920 @3.8.
No difference at all!
I do not type faster on my keyboard and internet speed is the same!
just got it up and running, finishing up installing apps, loving it so far
going to give it a nice burn-in before trying to push it
I always thought burning it in was accomplished BY pushing it
LOL!
2009 Nehalem i7 Build Log 16-18th January 2009
During the weekend beginning from the 16th of January , the old Pentium 4 built inside a chieftec matrix case was about to be replaced by a new machine altogether.
The specs of the old machine are as follows:
ABIT ice-7 pro Socket 478 Mobo
2gb DDR Ram
Nvidia 7800GTX AGP Card(i had a ATI 9800gtx before)
Intel Pentium 4 3.2ghz northwood
Seasonic 450w PSU
Chieftect full tower Matrix case
The specs of the new pc are:
ASUS P6T deluxe Socket 1336 Mobo
3GB DDR3 Ram
Nvidia 260GTX card
Intel i7 920 2.6GHZ Nehalem
Seasonic m12 600W PSU
Lian LI full tower PC-A7010 case
Thermalright Ultra Extreme aka TRUE
Enermax 120mm fan.
As you can see, this is a major upgrade for me and one i have enjoyed building over last weekend. Enough talk, lets see some pictures !!
All done..
I have read some reviews that if you go with 6GB Ram 2GBx3, and a x64 OS, you get a major performance Boost......
what about having 6 1gb sticks? im planning on getting another 3gb soon
2009 Nehalem i7 Build Log 16-18th January 2009
2.8ghz won't feel that much faster than 2.66ghz -- I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who could really notice a 5% difference right away.probaby because of dynamic oc'ing, stock i7 920 runs at 2.8ghz actually when under load (more, if the load is on one core only)
2.8ghz won't feel that much faster than 2.66ghz -- I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who could really notice a 5% difference right away.
Mine is also @ 3.8
It seems most has tthem running around 3.8 - 4.1. I just hope mine will do in that range. I will find out some time this week.....
Mine too is stable at 3.8Ghz, but I don't run it there 24/7. Stock cooling makes 3.6Ghz my top end for now. It may be my top end for good, I honestly just cannot justify pushing my chip any harder then it is now considering how much I already got out of it. Since I got this much out of it on stock cooling, I don't see another 400mhz being worth a whole new cooler or even worth the cost for a mounting kit to move my TRUE from the Q6600 to the i7. Stock cooling, stock voltage, and 1Ghz of free speed above stock. Can't beat that, not even with a stick.
2.8ghz won't feel that much faster than 2.66ghz -- I think you'd be hard pressed to find someone who could really notice a 5% difference right away.
i got mine at 3.3ghz and i have a TRUE. should i push it any further? if i do i need to tweek teh VCORE? id otn have very fast ddr3 ram though. only 1066
Your Ram may hinder you if you push it more. But I am not real good at these things. But if it were me, I would leave it alone until I got faster Ram..... just my 2 cents
And a worthy 2 cents it is. You are correct, his ram will be his limitation for any serious overclocking. Good advice.
And a worthy 2 cents it is. You are correct, his ram will be his limitation for any serious overclocking. Good advice.
I got the Cooler Master V8. I just hope it does a good job. I havent seen any bad reviews on it, so ............
let me know how you do with your OC, i'm using a V8 as well, and will start pushing the cpu this week