I love how some morons here are talking about "trumped up charges" and how he didn't deserve to be arrested. Maybe you should...I don't know...LOOK AT THE ACTUAL LAWS to determine if he did anything illegal.
2903.21 Aggravated menacing.
(A) No person shall knowingly cause another to believe that the offender will cause serious physical harm to the person or property of the other person, the other persons unborn, or a member of the other persons immediate family.
(B) Whoever violates this section is guilty of aggravated menacing. Except as otherwise provided in this division, aggravated menacing is a misdemeanor of the first degree. If the victim of the offense is an officer or employee of a public children services agency or a private child placing agency and the offense relates to the officers or employees performance or anticipated performance of official responsibilities or duties, aggravated menacing is a felony of the fifth degree or, if the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to an offense of violence, the victim of that prior offense was an officer or employee of a public children services agency or private child placing agency, and that prior offense related to the officers or employees performance or anticipated performance of official responsibilities or duties, a felony of the fourth degree
I'm pretty sure brandishing a gun in a fucking store falls under this definition.
You call others morons, then you post a definition of the law that actually would make the guy completely innocent according to what he did in the article. Note - it says to be guilty you have to suggest SERIOUS physical harm to another PERSON or THEIR property. The guy said he had a half a mind to shoot HIS own phone. That wasn't somebody else's property, and he didn't say he was going to shoot it inside the store.
Before you call others morons and quote something I'd suggest reading what you quote first.