pyroman1 said:This makes little to no sense whatsoever. From your arguement you are stating that PC P&C effectively buys a Seasonic PSU, makes some minor sdjustments and resells it for a large premium. This would make PC P&C basically a reseller.
Yet, later on, which you never seemed to indicate that you were wrong with this statement, it is clearly shown that PC P&C designs their PSUs and they outsource manufacturing. Instead you violate the very first forum rule: "Absolutely NO FLAMING OR NAME CALLING. Mutual respect and civilized conversation is the required norm." Am I to understand that this particular rule only applies to members and not moderators?
Merc was a little bit sarcastic with his post:
But your response:
to his comment about never having heard of any problems was harsh. He said he never heard of any problems, not that there were none. If you want to disprove him by stating that you found one, then great. But going about it by being bitter and sharp is clearly a violation of the forum rules.
Finally there is this:
I have read all six pages of this post, and I have come to the conclusion that not one of the people arguing about PC P&C not manufacturing their product is an engineer.
To be quite honest, it really doesn't matter that much who solders the parts together. Robots (pre-programmed and non-intelligent) are doing this more and more these days. Do we say that Ford's are not made by Ford because they are put together by a machine? NO!
An engineer creates a Requirements Document, this document clearly indicates the problem so that all parties can agree on what is being designed. For example, I might tell you "make me a table." When you come back with a round table and I wanted a rectangular table, then we did not solidify the agreement with proper documentation detailing the exact nature of the requirements. The Requirements Document can also state exactly what quality parts are to be used in the design.
Next is a Specs/Design document. This spells out how you are going to implement your design. The goal here is to have something that you could submit when applying for a patent. Every single detail must be laid out so that anyone in the field could take your document and create your design. This is what PC P&C would submit to the firm building their products.
At this stage the engineer is done and the worker does the work. As one of my professors likes to say, "now is when you ship the design to India for it to be made."
The real value is in the design, not so much in the warehouse that makes it. I could have a really crappy design that is implemented beautifully in {insert your favorite manufacturing plant here}. It still is a crappy design that will fail.
I could also have a great design that is built by a crappy company, and I'll get a crappy product. The difference here is that PC P&C (or any company for that matter) has the right, and should have the obligation, to say "No, this is not what we asked for do it again and this time do it right. We will not pay for your mistake."
Seasonic may have a great manufacturing plant, that is why PC P&C uses them. But do they have great engineers? I don't know, and no one here implied that they don't.
It is unfortunate that the people on this forum talk about what they don't understand and continue to argue it fully. Was Merc wrong about where the PSU is manufactured? Yes. Does it matter? No. Why? It was still designed by them. Merc even apologized for his mistake and repeatedly asked that the arguements stop, yet you make the following comment:
It seems like you are trying to spin your arguement into your best light. How does who manufactured the product have such a large impact?
They didn't buy someone else's design, make a few modifications to it and slap their name on the final product. If they did, that would be worth arguing about.
One of the few who honstly does se the bigger picture!1
Also who understands what all is involved down to the littlest detail!!
I couldn`t have said it better myself!!