Edit: Ok, let's make this easier for you to reply. Poll time! Choices are A, B, C, and D.
A: Samsung 204T
B: ViewSonic VP2000S
C: Sceptre X20G-Naga II
D: Other (please specify)
Please vote at least!
I'm going to purchase a 1600x1200 LCD soon, and I need advice on which one I should get. It will be used for gaming. I don't do photo editing or any of that other stuff. And I don't play fps's that much that I think I need lower than a 16ms response time.
I want it to be cheap, and I'm fine with 16 ms response time.
the two ones that I am mainly debating are the
Samsung 204T
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824001193
$550
ViewSonic VP2000S
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824116367
$560 - $50 MIR
The main differences that I see are in three areas:
Samsung 204T
Viewing Angle 178°/178°
Brightness 300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 700:1
ViewSonic VP2000S
Viewing Angle 176°(H) / 176°(V)
Brightness 250 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 400:1
Now, these are both pretty expensive imho, so I was also looking at Sceptre (which one of my friends is planning on buying soon):
Sceptre X20G-Naga II
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824112158
$490
Viewing Angle 170°(H) / 170°(V)
Brightness 300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 700:1
The only problem is that a lot of people say that this monitor doesn't actually have a 16ms response time, that in reality it seems higher. There also seem to be a lot of problems with getting a good working monitor.
-------
Which would you guys recommend? Are there any others that are cheaper?
And I REALLY don't want to spend more than the 204T. It seems like a real quality monitor, spending more doesn't seem worth it.
Thanks!
A: Samsung 204T
B: ViewSonic VP2000S
C: Sceptre X20G-Naga II
D: Other (please specify)
Please vote at least!
I'm going to purchase a 1600x1200 LCD soon, and I need advice on which one I should get. It will be used for gaming. I don't do photo editing or any of that other stuff. And I don't play fps's that much that I think I need lower than a 16ms response time.
I want it to be cheap, and I'm fine with 16 ms response time.
the two ones that I am mainly debating are the
Samsung 204T
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824001193
$550
ViewSonic VP2000S
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824116367
$560 - $50 MIR
The main differences that I see are in three areas:
Samsung 204T
Viewing Angle 178°/178°
Brightness 300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 700:1
ViewSonic VP2000S
Viewing Angle 176°(H) / 176°(V)
Brightness 250 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 400:1
Now, these are both pretty expensive imho, so I was also looking at Sceptre (which one of my friends is planning on buying soon):
Sceptre X20G-Naga II
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16824112158
$490
Viewing Angle 170°(H) / 170°(V)
Brightness 300 cd/m2
Contrast Ratio 700:1
The only problem is that a lot of people say that this monitor doesn't actually have a 16ms response time, that in reality it seems higher. There also seem to be a lot of problems with getting a good working monitor.
-------
Which would you guys recommend? Are there any others that are cheaper?
And I REALLY don't want to spend more than the 204T. It seems like a real quality monitor, spending more doesn't seem worth it.
Thanks!