Omega or OCFaq drivers?

[DaveX]

Which ones do you prefer? Which one is better for softmodding? I want to know what you guys think. Isn't the OCFaq drivers also not approved by Futuremark in 3DMark testing? I don't think it really matters but I hate having to look at a paragraph of red warning text. All opinions welcome. I'd just like to say I love W1zzard's work.

 

[pantherdan]

I use Omega drivers (PERIOD) for the ATI in my lappy. I have had way too many games run crappy (tearing, stuttering, crashing, lockups, etc) on Cats and the old ATI drivers. Now, for my Nvidia GF series cards, I just run the official drivers, since they run fine on most new games. I have tried Omega Nvidia drivers a while back, but I saw no real advantage.

Never tried OCFaq drivers, so I won't say they are bad, I just know the Omegas are good. ATI has even recognized Omegacorner as having some of the best tweaked drivers you can get.

 

[DaveX]

Any more opinions?

 

[Killa|3yte]

yes

CATALYST!!!

 

[archevilangel]

eh, personally I just use the ocfaq ones. I used to use the omega ones before I decided the tweaks werent worth it and I wanted more or less stock drivers(w/ overclocking for my 9000 of course) so I use ocfaq. Either way, they are both good drivers.

 

[DaveX]

OCFaq drivers aren't "approved" by Futuremark right?

 

[jamezzz122]

Originally posted by DaveX
OCFaq drivers aren't "approved" by Futuremark right?

All that is different is the hacked ones on there...The rest are jsut regular CATs...