SuperKeijo
Gawd
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2007
- Messages
- 705
Hi!
I'd like to ask your opinion on what to do on this matter regarding e4300 overclocking and stability. The thing is, according to orthos' small fft torture test all is fine up to atleast at 3366MHz and (at 1.55v LOL. I do get some pretty bogus temps with these settings. Everest ultimate says 93 degrees, TAT is at ~87 but coretemp 0.94 gives a reasonable 74c, and that's the one I believe at the moment.). It can run hours on that speed with no instability in sight.
TAT (Intel thermal analysis tool) tells another story. It starts showing instability at 3150MHz and 1,43v. It seems that the problem with tat is that it needs shitloads more voltage, and the higher the cpu speeds go the more voltage it requires compared to orthos. At 3GHz both are fine with 1,35v. At 3150MHz orthos is fine with 1,4v but TAT needs over 1,43. At 3,3GHz orthos is fine with 1,48v while TAT is basically unstable with reasonable voltages. The problem here isn't temps, because orthos 3366mhz and 1,55v runs a hell lot warmer than TAT at 3150.
So, I'd like to hear what you guys think about this. Basically I want to know should I just forget TAT and stick with orthos stability testing, or pump up the voltages required to get TAT stable? I know TAT is kind of overkill and it seems pretty unreasonable running at much higher voltages than I practically need for everything (other than TAT). My filosophy with overclocking is that I'm not satisfied until EVERY program runs stable, but maybe with TAT I might have to make an exception. I hope I could just forget TAT and stick with the more moderate voltages required to get orthos stable. Hell TAT doesn't even run on other than Intel chipsets so should I just forget about it?
I'd like to ask your opinion on what to do on this matter regarding e4300 overclocking and stability. The thing is, according to orthos' small fft torture test all is fine up to atleast at 3366MHz and (at 1.55v LOL. I do get some pretty bogus temps with these settings. Everest ultimate says 93 degrees, TAT is at ~87 but coretemp 0.94 gives a reasonable 74c, and that's the one I believe at the moment.). It can run hours on that speed with no instability in sight.
TAT (Intel thermal analysis tool) tells another story. It starts showing instability at 3150MHz and 1,43v. It seems that the problem with tat is that it needs shitloads more voltage, and the higher the cpu speeds go the more voltage it requires compared to orthos. At 3GHz both are fine with 1,35v. At 3150MHz orthos is fine with 1,4v but TAT needs over 1,43. At 3,3GHz orthos is fine with 1,48v while TAT is basically unstable with reasonable voltages. The problem here isn't temps, because orthos 3366mhz and 1,55v runs a hell lot warmer than TAT at 3150.
So, I'd like to hear what you guys think about this. Basically I want to know should I just forget TAT and stick with orthos stability testing, or pump up the voltages required to get TAT stable? I know TAT is kind of overkill and it seems pretty unreasonable running at much higher voltages than I practically need for everything (other than TAT). My filosophy with overclocking is that I'm not satisfied until EVERY program runs stable, but maybe with TAT I might have to make an exception. I hope I could just forget TAT and stick with the more moderate voltages required to get orthos stable. Hell TAT doesn't even run on other than Intel chipsets so should I just forget about it?