Is this true?
I mean look at doom 3 on a 4 Gb system, with the 6800Ultra PCI-E vs the AGP equivalent - there's literally a 1fps difference at 1600x1200. Is it the P4 cpu holding it back? Would the same vs two FX-53's show one to be *noticeably* better than the other?
So PCI-E and DDR2 equal no performance gain in doom3, at least not yet, which would mean no performance gain what so ever in games for at least a year, most likely?
The technology doesn't seem to be worth getting now *at all*, especially as much better hardware will be out in a year or more.
So is the above entirely true in terms of gaming?
I mean look at doom 3 on a 4 Gb system, with the 6800Ultra PCI-E vs the AGP equivalent - there's literally a 1fps difference at 1600x1200. Is it the P4 cpu holding it back? Would the same vs two FX-53's show one to be *noticeably* better than the other?
So PCI-E and DDR2 equal no performance gain in doom3, at least not yet, which would mean no performance gain what so ever in games for at least a year, most likely?
The technology doesn't seem to be worth getting now *at all*, especially as much better hardware will be out in a year or more.
So is the above entirely true in terms of gaming?