Sheer Awesomeness: l33t Coder Cake

lol l33t.

my wife would probably be like "really, code on the cake. as if you dont do that enough at home".
 
lol that's cool.

And Bahamut, bad! Bad pun! lol
 
Reminds me of the time I wrote out "Happy Birthday" in binary for a fellow geek's birthday card. He naturally dove into the task of decoding it....

This is really creative though. I think my wife might try to hurt me if I did this... hm....
 
That is just pure awesomeness... However, next time they need to use assembly. :)
 
Oh man, all I can think of is the scenes in every Austin Powers movie where he just goes pun insane...

"Oh yeah, I'll bet the catering is gonna have a lot of garbage to clean up after this party, baby..."

"Am I laying it on too thick, baby... should I spread it around a... bit more..."

Ok ok, I'm done. :D
 
while (!death) {
have_and_hold();
love_and_cherish();
}

Probably want to check "death" first...
 
limes said:
while (!death) {
have_and_hold();
love_and_cherish();
}

Probably want to check "death" first...
Click to expand...

This, also It irks me when people check bools against values.
if(dead)
is so much better than...
if(dead == true)
 
DaFox said:
This, also It irks me when people check bools against values.
if(dead)
is so much better than...
if(dead == true)
Click to expand...
The only thing geekier than the novelty of a wedding cake with code on it is the nerds trying to optimize said code :p
 
I once wrote HAPPY NEW YEAR using RNA codons, but it wasn't on a cake.

Robstar said:
There are no arguments to those functions :)
Click to expand...
Strictly speaking, they are procedures. ;)
There is also no honour_and_obey() sub, but I'm pretty sure that one's obsolete.

limes said:
while (!death) {
have_and_hold();
love_and_cherish();
}

Probably want to check "death" first...
Click to expand...
By some definitions, if you don't run through those procedures at least once the marriage never even started.
 
^ Dammit, somebody beat me to it. I should've read the rest of the thread. :eek:
 
TwistedAegis said:
Easy there cupcake.

And while he was coding, he left out an important part...

While(alive){
sex++;
}
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure sex is covered by "have_and_hold". If you think the rate of sex increments as time goes on, you're not married. If it's just a counter, well, there's not much point in keeping score after marriage either.
 
Volume said:
The only thing geekier than the novelty of a wedding cake with code on it is the nerds trying to optimize said code :p
Click to expand...
The only way to appropriately optimize a Java application is to rewrite it in C ;)
 
Seeing some of the comments here, I'd be surprise if none of you guys do/did the same for your wedding cake :eek:
 
Hornet said:
Seeing some of the comments here, I'd be surprise if none of you guys do/did the same for your wedding cake :eek:
Click to expand...
You think my wife would have let me at the cake? She was a floral designer at the time...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top