A bit like FED/SED tech but simpler. Dot pitch might not be so good for small displays
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dxXUtx2RN0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dxXUtx2RN0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i saw this at ces, one of the better displays there.
best choices at ces was this display, the panasonic 2012 plasma, and the sharp 8k display.
yea, it seems like it would be pretty expensive. what happens when they start burning out? will the pixels start blacking out?
Hopefully we'll see them sooner than later. But I thought Sony was out of the oled game...
I am even more excited about this tech than Oled. It has almost all positive display attributes and virtually no negatives.
Is there a chance of backlight bleed with this LED system? If there is, this tech sucks compared to OLED.
What backlight?
There is no TFT film. If you know what backlighting bleeding actually is, you'd know that backlight bleeding is impossible with this technology.
I have no idea why people find it so hard to understand this technology. Perhaps because its Sony and everyone hates Sony but remember that Sony has, and still, makes some pretty mean high end hardware.
The LED's are the light and the pixels in one... they are not a backlight. When there is an RGB value to be displayed, the LED is on, when it is (0,0,0) - black, the LED turns off. It is just like OLED.
Crystal LED vs Plasma high end 3840x2160 TVs might be an interesting format war in a few years. I still think it's going to be too expensive for monitors though.
How did the 2012 plasma look compared to the LED display and the older version plasma's?
A wide gamut is a marketing ploy for monitors, and generally a bad thing for consumers. What you want is a perfect standard gamut, not a wider than standard gamut.