whisper
Limp Gawd
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2003
- Messages
- 466
Well, I'm still determined to get some more life from my Opteron 165 rig. I just upgraded my RAM to some OCZ platinum PC3200 sticks (2x1GB) and these things are blowing my old Corsair RAM out of the water. I've been disappointed with the overclock potential of my rig for a while, and now I'm pretty convinced my RAM was holding me back all along. So long story short, I've now found at least two workable overclock scenarios with this new RAM of mine:
1. If I set the memory divider to 200 I can do 300x9 for a respectable 2.7 ghz processor speed. The only downside here is that my new RAM is running a mere DDR 300. But this is totally stable and seems like a nice processor overclock.
2. If I bump the divider up to 266 I can do 275x9 to obtain a decent 2.47 ghz proc speed. This is not quite as nice as 2.7 ghz, but on the upside my RAM is cruising at 450 DDR. My old sticks would have crapped out well below this.
I've tried other things but these seem to be the most stable options. So my question is, which of the above two options would you guys go for? I'm leaning toward the second one. Although the processor overclock is a little less, it seems to be the better all-around overclock making use of both the proc and RAM. Btw, this is all on stock cooling and stock voltage for the cpu (1.35v). RAM is at 2.8v.
Sorry if I'm boring everyone with questions about my ancient rig. But for me this is a significant advancement. Opinions appreciated, thanks
1. If I set the memory divider to 200 I can do 300x9 for a respectable 2.7 ghz processor speed. The only downside here is that my new RAM is running a mere DDR 300. But this is totally stable and seems like a nice processor overclock.
2. If I bump the divider up to 266 I can do 275x9 to obtain a decent 2.47 ghz proc speed. This is not quite as nice as 2.7 ghz, but on the upside my RAM is cruising at 450 DDR. My old sticks would have crapped out well below this.
I've tried other things but these seem to be the most stable options. So my question is, which of the above two options would you guys go for? I'm leaning toward the second one. Although the processor overclock is a little less, it seems to be the better all-around overclock making use of both the proc and RAM. Btw, this is all on stock cooling and stock voltage for the cpu (1.35v). RAM is at 2.8v.
Sorry if I'm boring everyone with questions about my ancient rig. But for me this is a significant advancement. Opinions appreciated, thanks