OK, I'm having a dilemma here. Right now my rig is a AMD Barton 3000 at 2350mhz with a gig of pc3200 Kingston Valueram. My board is a Nforce2 Asus A7n8x Deluxe. Nevermind about video card. What I plan to do with my computer is just one thing. GAME. I am going to be playing Battlefield 2 non stop amoung other pc games. I like to play at 1280 by 1024 with AA and AF up as high as I can. I have noticed that in benchmarks, when running at high rez's and putting up those options, the FPS you get is limited on your GPU. When running games like that, will upgrading my processor be worth it?
My question is should I A:Take advantage of the much cheaper AGP video cards from ATI (Example, a AGP x800xt costs $389 when a pci-e costs $500, and the x850XT for agp is $400 and the pci-e is $440). and keep the motherboard/cpu/ram I have now.
or B: Get a 3000 Venice, buy new gpu and cpu blocks, get new gig of ram, get a nforce4 ultra board, a pci-e card and a new psu? How much would you say the other new parts would affect my fps at really high resolutions(beyond 1280x1024). For example, Farcry at 1600x1200.
Right now with a 9700 non pro at 370/290 I can run HL2 at 1280x1024 with 6AA and 8AF nice and smooth.
My question is should I A:Take advantage of the much cheaper AGP video cards from ATI (Example, a AGP x800xt costs $389 when a pci-e costs $500, and the x850XT for agp is $400 and the pci-e is $440). and keep the motherboard/cpu/ram I have now.
or B: Get a 3000 Venice, buy new gpu and cpu blocks, get new gig of ram, get a nforce4 ultra board, a pci-e card and a new psu? How much would you say the other new parts would affect my fps at really high resolutions(beyond 1280x1024). For example, Farcry at 1600x1200.
Right now with a 9700 non pro at 370/290 I can run HL2 at 1280x1024 with 6AA and 8AF nice and smooth.