being a noobie to the [h] forum, i've spent quite a bit of time reading all the various forums...
something has caught my eye in the fs/ft tips/tricks & trolls threads...
not having been a big online trader, when i finally figured out what "heat" was (yea, i'm a little slow sometimes ), i thought to myself, "wow, what a great idea. people who have made trades with each other in an 'unstructured environment' (vs. ebay) giving assessments of their trading partners, sounds like something that would really be helpful" ...
however, after much reading, i've realized that heat isn't really as useful as it might be (or even as useful as it appears on the surface)... this is because it has become obvious to me that people do not leave negative heat when it is warranted... this would appear to be because they fear "retaliatory negative heat"...
two points...
a) something like heat doesn't work without people leaving honest assessments of their deals with people (my goodness, after what people went through with that spazzygirl character, how could they even consider leaving neutral heat? or other threads i've read where people have left POSITIVE heat after experiences almost as bad)... this makes no sense... if no one ever leaves negatives, how does heat benefit anyone? if you aren't willing to "take one for the team" (so to speak), heat doesn't work...
b) one would think it would be relatively easy if you get "retaliatory negatives" to post a short explanation linking to the negative that you left for the "bad trader" as to what your negative is. after all... say you've got a boatload of positives and one negative... anyone who is rational should be able to look at that and say "gee, what is wrong with this picture"... sure, some paranoid fool may refuse to deal with you ("wow, you've got 1 negative vs. 100 positives, you must be a really bad trader" ), but i'd like to think that most people would be able to recognize "situations" for what they are...
just some comments from someone who is new to this world, and maybe has a bit of a different perception of how things work... feel free to tell me why i'm wrong, i can take a bit of a beating...
something has caught my eye in the fs/ft tips/tricks & trolls threads...
not having been a big online trader, when i finally figured out what "heat" was (yea, i'm a little slow sometimes ), i thought to myself, "wow, what a great idea. people who have made trades with each other in an 'unstructured environment' (vs. ebay) giving assessments of their trading partners, sounds like something that would really be helpful" ...
however, after much reading, i've realized that heat isn't really as useful as it might be (or even as useful as it appears on the surface)... this is because it has become obvious to me that people do not leave negative heat when it is warranted... this would appear to be because they fear "retaliatory negative heat"...
two points...
a) something like heat doesn't work without people leaving honest assessments of their deals with people (my goodness, after what people went through with that spazzygirl character, how could they even consider leaving neutral heat? or other threads i've read where people have left POSITIVE heat after experiences almost as bad)... this makes no sense... if no one ever leaves negatives, how does heat benefit anyone? if you aren't willing to "take one for the team" (so to speak), heat doesn't work...
b) one would think it would be relatively easy if you get "retaliatory negatives" to post a short explanation linking to the negative that you left for the "bad trader" as to what your negative is. after all... say you've got a boatload of positives and one negative... anyone who is rational should be able to look at that and say "gee, what is wrong with this picture"... sure, some paranoid fool may refuse to deal with you ("wow, you've got 1 negative vs. 100 positives, you must be a really bad trader" ), but i'd like to think that most people would be able to recognize "situations" for what they are...
just some comments from someone who is new to this world, and maybe has a bit of a different perception of how things work... feel free to tell me why i'm wrong, i can take a bit of a beating...